Horticultural Reviews, Volume 49

Здесь есть возможность читать онлайн «Horticultural Reviews, Volume 49» — ознакомительный отрывок электронной книги совершенно бесплатно, а после прочтения отрывка купить полную версию. В некоторых случаях можно слушать аудио, скачать через торрент в формате fb2 и присутствует краткое содержание. Жанр: unrecognised, на английском языке. Описание произведения, (предисловие) а так же отзывы посетителей доступны на портале библиотеки ЛибКат.

Horticultural Reviews, Volume 49: краткое содержание, описание и аннотация

Предлагаем к чтению аннотацию, описание, краткое содержание или предисловие (зависит от того, что написал сам автор книги «Horticultural Reviews, Volume 49»). Если вы не нашли необходимую информацию о книге — напишите в комментариях, мы постараемся отыскать её.

Horticultural Reviews
Hydrangea quercifolia

Horticultural Reviews, Volume 49 — читать онлайн ознакомительный отрывок

Ниже представлен текст книги, разбитый по страницам. Система сохранения места последней прочитанной страницы, позволяет с удобством читать онлайн бесплатно книгу «Horticultural Reviews, Volume 49», без необходимости каждый раз заново искать на чём Вы остановились. Поставьте закладку, и сможете в любой момент перейти на страницу, на которой закончили чтение.

Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

Because winters are variable and unpredictable, controlled freezing experiments offer the most reliable information on cold tolerance at a given point during the winter (Pagter and Williams 2011; Hokanson and McNamara 2013; Pagter et al. 2014). These controlled freezing experiments can be used to identify populations or individuals that are more cold hardy or that deacclimate later than average (McNamara and Hokanson 2010). Identifying populations with increased cold tolerance or deacclimation resistance can provide an advantageous starting point for improvement. Although midwinter hardiness was not significantly different, the variation in deacclimation between ‘Alice’ and ‘Alison’ in controlled freezing tests (Dirr et al. 1993) indicates that genetic variation for winter survival traits may exist in H. quercifolia . A similar pattern was detected between H. macrophylla and H. paniculata where the latter, in addition to being far hardier in midwinter, retained its ability to withstand cold temperatures longer into an experimental warming period (Pagter et al. 2008a,b, 2011a,b). However, H. paniculata deacclimated faster than H. macrophylla , suggesting that midwinter hardiness and rate of deacclimation may need to be different breeding objectives.

F. Breeding for Floral Characteristics

Variation exists in H. quercifolia for floral characteristics such as flower color, flowering time, flower size, and double flowers (Dirr 2004). Because the white sepals become pink or brown as the inflorescence ages, the flower color variation consists of whether they turn pink, the timing of pinking, and the shade of pink. To date, there are no known genotypes which have flowers that open pink. Inheritance of flower color in Hydrangea is not well studied, but it appears to be a quantitative trait considering the variability based on environment (with light intensity likely being a factor) and the seemingly infinite number of intermediate phenotypes. Variation in flowering time is available in cultivars such as ‘Late Hand’, which blooms about one month later than typical (Dirr 2004), and ‘Queen of Hearts’, which blooms about 7–10 days later than other cultivars (Reed and Alexander 2015). In the wild, individual plants have been observed flowering later in the season than the surrounding plants, while others flower multiple times in one season (A. Sherwood, pers. observ.). However, research will be required to identify environmental effects from those that are genetically controlled. Considerable variation also exists for flower size, with panicles ranging from 7 cm long in some wild plants (A. Sherwood, unpubl.) up to approximately 30 cm long in many cultivars. In H. macrophylla , double flowers are a recessively inherited trait that may be controlled by a single major gene (Suyama et al. 2015; Waki et al. 2018). However, double flowered H. quercifolia genotypes produce little to no seed or pollen, and the fertility of any pollen or seed that is produced by double flowers has not been studied. Additionally, the double flowered H. quercifolia cultivars tend to produce a considerably higher number of sepals (up to 20 per floret) compared to most of the double flowered H. macrophylla cultivars which produce around eight sepals per floret (Dirr 2004).

G. Germplasm Resources

At least 48 cultivars of oakleaf hydrangea have been named and introduced ( Table 1.1, Figure 1.8), many of which were selected directly out of the wild or from chance seedlings. Several have unique characteristics that would be useful as breeding material.

Table 1.1 Cultivars of oakleaf hydrangea including cultivar name (trade name or synonym in parentheses), plant and flower size, notes, and origin.

Cultivar Plant height (m) Panicle length (cm) Notes Origin
Alice 1 , 2 4 30 One of tallest cultivars; sepals turn pink Selected by Dirr on the University of Georgia, Athens campus
Alison 1 , 2, 3 3 25 Selected by Dirr on the University of Georgia, Athens campus
Amethyst 1 2 15 Sepals turn bright pink; nearly red Selected by Dirr
Applause 1 , 2 Cultivated for a long time without a cultivar name
Back Porch 1 Early flowers; sepals turn pink Introduced by Louisiana Nurseries
Burgundy 2 2 Burgundy fall color; sepals turn pink Bred by Rein and Mark Bulk, Netherlands, 1995
Camelot 1 , 2 Deep red fall color; sepals turn light pink Bred by Mary Nell McDaniel, Urbana, IL; introduced by Louisiana Nurseries, prior to 1995
Cloud Nine 1 , 2 Double flowers; pointed sepals Introduced by Louisiana Nurseries, prior to 1997
Dayspring (Day Spring) 1 Introduced by Flowerwood Nursery
Ellen Huff 1 Heat tolerant From Gulf Coast
Emerald Lake 1 , 2 2 Weak branches; possibly same as ‘Wade Mahlke’ Introduced by Louisiana Nurseries, prior to 1997
Brenhill (Gatsby Gal) Bred in Cleveland, AL; introduced by Spring Meadow Nurseries
Brother Edward (Gatsby Moon) Dense panicle, similar to Harmony Bred in Cleveland, AL; introduced by Spring Meadow Nurseries
JoAnn (Gatsby Pink) Sepals turn pink Bred in Kingsville, MO; introduced by Spring Meadow Nurseries
Doughill (Gatsby Star) Double flowers Bred in Cleveland, AL; introduced by Spring Meadow Nurseries
Gloster (Gloster Form) 1, 2 Five sepals per floret; grows well in the southern States Introduced by Louisiana Nurseries, prior to 1997
Harmony 1 , 2 3 30.5 Dense panicles that weigh branches down; sepals turn light pink Selected by Th. A. McDaniel in Harmony Baptist Church Cemetery, Attalla, AL; prior to 1985
Quercifolia (Horvaria) 1 Double flowers, similar to ‘Brido’ Hofstede Nursery
PIIHQ‐I (Jetstream) 1 Dark green foliage; sepals turn pink Bred by Plant Introductions, Inc.
Joe McDaniel 1 , 2 Large sepals Wild collection by J. C. McDaniel; raised by Louisiana Nurseries prior to 1997
John Wayne 1 , 2 2 Selected from FL; Introduced by Louisiana Nurseries prior to 1997
Late Hand 1 , 2 One month late blooming; leaves have deep sinuses Introduced by Louisiana Nurseries, prior to 1997
Little Honey 1 1.5 12 Sepals do not turn pink Yellow leaf sport of ‘Pee Wee’ selected by Peter Catt in the UK
Luverne Pink 1 , 2 Sepals turn pink Introduced by Louisiana Nurseries prior to 1997
Lynn Lowrey 1 2 20 Possibly same clone as ‘Angola Prison’ Selected by Tom Dodd III in Louisiana
Marshall 2 Relatively small flowers; sepals turn pink
Montmorenci Rose 1 Sepals turn pink quickly Selected out of a South Carolina garden by Paul Crosby; introduced by Nurseries Caroliniana
Munchkin 4 0.9 17 Compact growth habit; sepals turn light pink USDA‐ARS Floral and Nursery Crops Laboratory
Patio Pink 1 , 2 Early flowers; large leaves; sepals turn pink Introduced by Louisiana Nurseries prior to 1997
Pee Wee 1 , 2 1.5 12 Sepals do not turn pink Introduced by Louisiana Nurseries
Picnic Hill 1 , 2 Short internodes; sepals turn light pink Introduced by Louisiana Nurseries prior to 1997
Queen of Hearts 5 1.9 30 7–10 days late blooming; sepals turn light pink USDA‐ARS Floral and Nursery Crops Laboratory
Roanoke 1 , 2 3 Flopping branches Introduced by Louisiana Nurseries, prior to 1993
Ruby Slippers 3 1 25 Sepals turn deep pink, nearly red USDA‐ARS Floral and Nursery Crops Laboratory
Semmes Beauty (Semmes Select) 1 Heat tolerant
Shannon 1 1.5 Double flower, less dense than ‘Brido’; more upright panicles Theodore Klein, Crestwood, KY
Sike's Dwarf 1 , 2 1.5 Flowers July–August; sepals turn light pink; larger than ‘Pee Wee’ Introduced by Louisiana Nurseries, prior to 1990
Snow Giant 1 , 2 3 Double flower; possibly same clone as ‘Brido’ Japanese origin
Flemygea (Snow Queen) 1 , 2 2.5 18 Upright panicles; flowers June–September B. Flemer, Princeton Nurseries, prior to 1980
Snowdrift 2 Flowers are similar to those of ‘Harmony’; thin branches Bred in the United States before 2000
Brido (Snowflake) 1 , 2 3 30 Double flower, flowers slightly later Edgar Aldridge, 1960
Summit 1 1.5 18 Theodore Klein, Crestwood, KY
Tennessee (Tennessee Clone) 1 , 2 2 25 Four or five wavy sepals; flowers July–August; wrinkled leaves; wider than high; sepals greenish in color From seed collected in Tennessee by Jelena de Belder of Arboretum Kalmthout, Belgium, 1974
Turkey Hill 1 Similar to ‘Harmony’ Hayes Jackson, Anniston AL
Vaugh's Lillie 1 Dense rounded mophead Vaughn Billingsley, Georgia
Wade Mahlke (Wade Malke) 1 , 2 25 Possibly same clone as ‘Emerald Lake’ Louisiana Nurseries prior to 1997

1Dirr (2004).

Читать дальше
Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

Похожие книги на «Horticultural Reviews, Volume 49»

Представляем Вашему вниманию похожие книги на «Horticultural Reviews, Volume 49» списком для выбора. Мы отобрали схожую по названию и смыслу литературу в надежде предоставить читателям больше вариантов отыскать новые, интересные, ещё непрочитанные произведения.


Отзывы о книге «Horticultural Reviews, Volume 49»

Обсуждение, отзывы о книге «Horticultural Reviews, Volume 49» и просто собственные мнения читателей. Оставьте ваши комментарии, напишите, что Вы думаете о произведении, его смысле или главных героях. Укажите что конкретно понравилось, а что нет, и почему Вы так считаете.

x