Джим Коллинз: От хорошего к великому

Burrough & Helyar, Barbarians at the Gate (Harper Perennial, 1990); “Cigarette Conglomerate”, Financial World, February 5, 1969, 4; “Voyage into the Unkown”, Forbes, December 1, 1971, 30; “When Marketing Takes Over at R.J.Reynolds”, Business Week, November 13, 1978, 82.

“A Paper Tiger Grows Claws”, Business Week, August 23, 1969, 100–102; “No-Longer-So-Great Scott”, Forbes, August 1, 1972, 25; “Now an outsider will run Scott Paper”, Business Week, April 23, 1979, 39, 42; “Scott a paper tiger”, Advertising Age, November 3, 1980, 96; “Scott Paper’s new Chief”, Business Week, November 30, 1981, 62; “Scott isn’t lumbering anymore”, Fortune, September 30, 1985, 48–55; “Bermuda Triangle”, Forbes, January 6, 1992, 284; “Al Dunlap: an Insider’s View”, Navigator, December 1997; “Did CEO Dunlap save Scott Paper-or just pretty it up? The Shredder”, Business Week, January 15, 1996.

“Silo, Discount Appliance Chain, Enjoys Payoff from Hard Sell”, Barron’s, March 29, 1971, 35; “An Appliance Dealer with Real Clout”, Business Week, November 6, 1971, 76; “Cyclops Acquires Silo”, The Wall Street Journal, October 16, 1979, 5; “Dixons Makes $384 Million US Bid”, Financial Times, February 18, 1987, 1; “Silo-Dixons Power: How Far Can It Reach”, Consumer Electronics, November 1988, 14; “Dixons Strategic Move into Los Angeles Area”, Financial Times, November 12, 1989, 10; “Shake-up at Silo”, Discount Store News, March 4, 1991, 1; “Dixons Tightens Grip on Silo”, HFD-The Weekly Home Furnishings Newspaper, February 3, 1992, 77.

“Upjohn: Two Upjohn Antibiotics Barred From Sale; FDA-Drug Company Confrontation is Seen”, The Wall Street Journal, May 15, 1969, 38; “Upjohn: Tweedle Dee: Upjohn can’t ever seem to do quite as well in ethical drugs as Tweedle Dum, its corporate lookalike, Eli Lilly, which is not great shakes either”, Forbes, March 1, 1970, 65–66; “Upjohn: Two Upjohn Drugs Linked to 32 Deaths Needn’t Be Banned, FDA Aide Testifies”, The Wall Street Journal, January 30, 1975, 14; “Upjohn: Hair-Raising Happenings at Upjohn (Testing a cure for baldness, the company squirms at the unwelcome clamor)”, Fortune, April 6, 1981, 67–69; “Upjohn: R&D Scoreboard: Drugs”, Business Week, June 22, 1987, 145; “Upjohn: Upjohn’s Stock Falls on Study’s Claim Its Anti-Baldness Drug Has Side Effects”, The Wall Street Journal, February 9, 1988, 2; “Upjohn: Law: Upjohn Settles Liability Suit Over Halcion Sleeping Pill”, The Wall Street Journal, August 12, 1991, B2.

“Gillette President S.K. Hensley Resigns to Accept Presidency of Warner-Lambert”, The Wall Street Journal, June 21, 1967, 32; “Say Little, Do Much”, Forbes, December 1, 1974, P. 52; “After the Diversification That Failed”, Business Week, February 28, 1977, 58; “Turning W-L into a Marketing Conglomerate”, Business Week, March 5, 1979, 60; “Hagan Outlines Strategic Plan”, PR Newswire, October 29, 1980; “Beating the Japanese in Japan”, Forbes, April 27, 1981, 44.

“Things Are Adding Up Again at Burroughs”, Business Week, March 11, 1967, 192; “How Ray Macdonald’s Growth Theory Created IBM’s Toughest Competitor”, Fortune, January, 1977, 94; “A Tough ‘Street Kid’ Steps in at Burroughs”, Business Week, October 29, 1979, 50; “Will a Shake-Up Revive Burroughs?” Business Week, May 4, 1981, 53; “Can Burroughs Catch Up Again?” Forbes, March 28, 1983, 78.

Robert A. Lutz, Guts: The Seven Laws of Business that Made Chrysler the World’s Hottest Car Company (NewYork: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1998), 27; “President Iacocca”, The Wall Street Journal, June 28, 1982, 1; “Is there life after Iacocca”, Forbes, April 8, 1985, 75; “Lee Iacocca’s Time of Trouble”, Fortune, March 14, 1988, 79; “Can Iacocca Fix Chrysler Again?” Fortune, April 8, 1991, 50; “After Lee”, The Economist, March 21, 1992, 70; “How Chrysler Filled Detroit’s Biggest Shoes”, The Wall Street Journal, September 7, 1994, B1; “Daimler-Benz Will Acquire Chrysler in $36 Billion Deal That Will Reshape Industry”, The New York Times, May 7, 1998, A1:6.

“Harris-Intertype, Radiation Inc Directors Approve Merger pact Valued at $39 million”, The Wall Street Journal, April 3, 1967, 30; “Critical Mass?” Forbes, April 15, 1976, 86; “Technology Transfer’s Master”, Business Week, October 10, 1977, 120; “Harris Corp.’s Remarkable Metamorphosis”, Forbes, May 26, 1980, 45; “Harris Corp.’s Bold Strategy”, Forbes, April 25, 1983, 96; “Harris is Raising its Bet on the Office of the Future”, Business Week, July 18, 1983, 134; “Harris Corp. Elects Hartley to Added Post of Chief”, The Wall Street Journal, April 1, 1986, 45; “New Harris President Prefers Growth to Downsizing”, U.P.I., April 23, 1993.

“Hasbro: On a Roll: Toymaker Hasbro Continues String of 25 % Yearly Growth”, Barron’s, July 19, 1982, 40; “Hasbro: Hasbro Toys Find Profits In Tradition”, The Wall Street Journal, December 12, 1983, 29, 53; “Hasbro: News: Hasbro gets its guns: Stephen Hassenfeld’s loading up for battle”, Industry Week, April 30, 1984, 17–18; “Hasbro: Silver: A Play on Toys: Hasbro Bradley’s Hassenfeld”, Financial World, April 16, 1985, 29; “Hasbro: Merry Christmas: It Has Already Come for Hasbro, Biggest U.S.Toymaker”, Barron’s, December 23, 1985, 34; “Hasbro: The Corporation: Strategies: How Hasbro Became King of the Toymakers: With $1,2, Billion in Sales and $99 Million in Profits, it is Now No. 1 Worldwide”, Business Week, September 22, 1986, 90–92; “Hasbro: Marketing: Toys: It’s Kid Brother’s Turn to Keep Hasbro Hot: Alan Hassenfeld must fill big shoes at the toymaker”, Business Week, June 26, 1989, 152–153.

“Rubbermaid: Sincere tyranny (Why has Stanley Gault spent the last four years moving and shaking at Rubbermaid? It was a case of serious problems masked by cheery numbers)”, Forbes, January 28, 1985, 54–55; “Rubbermaid: Rubbermaid emerges a ‘clear’ winner; food storage containers”, Chain Store Age – General Merchandise Trends, October 1986, 67; “Why the Bounce at Rubbermaid? The company sells humdrum goods in a mature market, and most of its competitors undercut its prices. But it has double sales and tripled earnings in the past six years”, Fortune, April 13, 1987, 77–78; “Rubbermaid: America’s most admired company”, Fortune, February 7, 1994, 50–54; “Rubbermaid: From the most admired to just acquired how Rubbermaid managed to fail”, Fortune, November 23, 1998, 32–33.

“Henry Singleton’s Singular Conglomerate”, Forbes, May 1, 1976, 38; “Two PhDs Turn Teledyne Into a Cash Machine”, Business Week, November 22, 1976, 133; “The Sphinx Speaks”, Forbes, February 20, 1978, 33; “Teledyne’s Winning Roster”, Forbes, August 17, 1981, 35; “Parting With Henry Singleton: Such Sweet Sorrow For Teledyne?”, Business Week, April 9, 1990, 81; “Teledyne to Pay $17,5 Million To Settle U.S. Criminal Charges”, The Washington Post, October 6, 1992, D6; “Teledyne Struggles to Recapture Magic of Yesterday”, The Wall Street Journal, November 22, 1993, B4:3; “Richard Simmons to Share Spotlight At Allegheny Teledyne, Sees ‘Good’ Fit”, The Wall Street Journal, April 3, 1996, B8:4.