Nikita Danilov - Alphabet of the Human Mind – 2. Global Psychotherapy

If the level of psychoanalysis is high enough and the psychotype is adequate, then you can diagnose the psyche of your own and someone else’s. There are various pros and cons. Pluses in the diagnosis of your psyche – more reliable information. A man knows much more about himself and knows exactly where the deception and the truth are. Although for a high level of psychoanalysis this is not a problem. Science has moved very seriously forward, and it becomes easy and unmistakable to distinguish some processes in the psyche from others with increasing levels. The diagnostics is not only about symptoms, but also about signs of a healthy psyche.

Cons in diagnosing self psyche. Special methods are needed to touch untreated injuries. And take into account the coefficient of associativity, reflexivity. More on this later. Mental trauma and other symptoms have a different coefficient of associativity. Some symptoms are activated immediately, other – not immediately. For example, in a person’s childhood injuries may be associated with a certain color or a specific subject. This could be the scenery in the movie scenes or life scenes with severe trauma to the psyche. Nevertheless, when they see a certain color or object, the injuries go outside, and the psychotype goes down to a more severe stage. With all the ensuing consequences.

In the days of the USSR. The well-known psychotherapist Snezhnevsky, suggested replacing capital punishment, execution. With the treatment of the psyche. These were the days of punitive psychiatry. Of course, psychology of that time had nothing common with medicine, and almost all psychologists had a zero level of all skills, on a scale of objective skills. Psychologists of that time had their own psychoanalysis and felt completely unpunished for any mistakes. When psychoanalysis is zero, there can be nothing but errors. It is extremely rare that their psychotypes are close to adequate. There were 1—2 of them throughout the country. But many called themselves psychologists and used the capabilities of their posts for criminal purposes. This is not a big topic for this chapter. Here is just one example.

Understanding this topic is necessary in order to be prepared for attacks by incompetent psychologists who hear that you are successfully engaged in psychoanalysis. And they will try to attack you, most likely, psychologically by the method of demoralization and devaluation of your personal achievements. Put yourself in the place of a large mass of people who call themselves psychologists, using criminal methods they got diplomas and dream of making money on it. Of course, they will fall into a certain state of frustration. Seeing that your level of psychoanalysis after careful reading of just one book is incomparably higher than their fictional one.

So here is an example. To get away from open conversations about the processes that take place in the Human Psyche, the “psychologists” of those times had a lot of templates in their arsenal. Why people with a zero level of psychoanalysis needed to get away from talking about psychology should be clear to everyone. When a person began a conversation about introspection of the psyche and made adequate arguments, then immediately introspection was compared with a surgical operation, and the conclusion is this: the patient cannot do the operation on his own. And then they tried to get away from the topic, since behind the low level of psychoanalysis, each “specialist” must have serious crimes. Especially those who do this in the healthcare system.

Of course, such an argument may not be adequate. Who decided that the psychologist is a surgeon? And should the patient be under anesthesia? We can say for sure that the patient in psychology must have a very active role. No one will restore the biochemical balance and neural connections, etc for patient. Why is a psychologist not a therapist in that comparison? Can a therapist make a diagnosis on his own? Yes of course. Can a dentist see which teeth are diseased? Yes. And the surgeon can see what his problem is before the operation, according to images and analyzes, for example. Here are a few adequate arguments that can be put in place both in personal conversation and in public discussion. Criminals in med robes and their accomplices.

The only goal of those who use such patterns is to get away from talking about topics about the human psyche. In which there is no understanding due to the zero level of psychoanalysis. There are, of course, exceptions. Not much in Russia, much more in Europe and America. But even these individuals have a very limited level of psychoanalysis. But they converge in one thought. The more you know in psychology, the less you understand. That is the right thought. For understanding, you need to understand the processes inside the psyche. How everything is arranged there. And only after understanding to string other knowledge into your mind, pondering, experimenting…

You cannot describe each situation. Too much! Recommendation. All on the topic of psychology, where a clear causal relationship is not traced, should be sent to an imaginary trash bin, like on a computer desktop. And in time to see whether it is necessary to restore or remove forever. In this example, where a psychologist was compared to a surgeon, there was no clear causal relationship. Why did psychology suddenly become surgery or vice versa? Nonsense. In psychology, this is very common. Einstein also said that he unconditionally believes in only one infinity. Infinity of human stupidity. Today, this infinity is called popular psychology. But has nothing common to do with science without a causal connection. This is important to remember.

AHM is precisely a science in which there is a clear causal relationship. It can be easily traced. Let us once again trace the main idea that modern top psychologists and psychotherapists speak in those countries where medicine is well developed. And specialists improve their professional skills all their lives, instead of improving the skills of evading responsibility for crimes caused by the low level of mental literacy in general. The general idea is: “You need to know a lot in order to understand at least something in psychology!” Why is that? Before AHM, there was no single concept that would give answers to what is happening in the psyche. What processes take place inside. A similar concept has been formed throughout life by top psychologists in private understanding. But it was far from perfect. This is exactly what the experts admitted. “At least something”. Unlike the “doctors” of the time of punitive psychiatry, who always knew the maximum, having no idea even about basic concepts in psychology.

AHM is a complete concept that explains the processes occurring in the psyche. And there is no need to spend your whole life for at least something to get on the shelves. Make right structure of understanding. Just a few weeks is enough for an adequate psychotype to deeply understand the classification, and everything in psychology will fall into place. Those who already have knowledge but cannot answer the question of what is the difference between the symptoms of mental illness and the signs of a healthy psyche, after understanding the classification of AHM, it is recommended to retrain. All theories in psychology will open up from a completely different angle. It will be clear what is right and what is not. What can be used, what cannot and how.

Now it’s clear that skills do not come from scrolling through an AHM book. And one must begin to engage in introspection or another type of psychoanalysis no earlier than the level of psychoanalysis and mental literacy as a whole will be sufficient for this. Nevertheless, a couple of recommendations and tips on this topic. Recommendations are given to a generalized psychotype, therefore, with the proper level of psychoanalysis, you can choose for yourself suitable ones and modify them for the context of your own life. All responsibility rests entirely with the reader.