• Пожаловаться

Vadim Birstein: The Perversion of Knowledge

Здесь есть возможность читать онлайн «Vadim Birstein: The Perversion of Knowledge» весь текст электронной книги совершенно бесплатно (целиком полную версию). В некоторых случаях присутствует краткое содержание. Город: Cambridge, MA, год выпуска: 2004, ISBN: 978-0-8133-4280-1, издательство: Westview Press, категория: История / Публицистика / dissident / на английском языке. Описание произведения, (предисловие) а так же отзывы посетителей доступны на портале. Библиотека «Либ Кат» — LibCat.ru создана для любителей полистать хорошую книжку и предлагает широкий выбор жанров:

любовные романы фантастика и фэнтези приключения детективы и триллеры эротика документальные научные юмористические анекдоты о бизнесе проза детские сказки о религиии новинки православные старинные про компьютеры программирование на английском домоводство поэзия

Выбрав категорию по душе Вы сможете найти действительно стоящие книги и насладиться погружением в мир воображения, прочувствовать переживания героев или узнать для себя что-то новое, совершить внутреннее открытие. Подробная информация для ознакомления по текущему запросу представлена ниже:

Vadim Birstein The Perversion of Knowledge

The Perversion of Knowledge: краткое содержание, описание и аннотация

Предлагаем к чтению аннотацию, описание, краткое содержание или предисловие (зависит от того, что написал сам автор книги «The Perversion of Knowledge»). Если вы не нашли необходимую информацию о книге — напишите в комментариях, мы постараемся отыскать её.

During the Soviet years, Russian science was touted as one of the greatest successes of the regime. Russian science was considered to be equal, if not superior, to that of the wealthy western nations. , a history of Soviet science that focuses on its control by the KGB and the Communist Party, reveals the dark side of this glittering achievement. Based on the author’s firsthand experience as a Soviet scientist, and drawing on extensive Russian language sources not easily available to the Western reader, the book includes shocking new information on biomedical experimentation on humans as well as an examination of the pernicious effects of Trofim Lysenko’s pseudo-biology. Also included are many poignant case histories of those who collaborated and those who managed to resist, focusing on the moral choices and consequences. The text is accompanied by the author’s own translations of key archival materials, making this work an essential resource for all those with a serious interest in Russian history. [Contain tables.]

Vadim Birstein: другие книги автора


Кто написал The Perversion of Knowledge? Узнайте фамилию, как зовут автора книги и список всех его произведений по сериям.

The Perversion of Knowledge — читать онлайн бесплатно полную книгу (весь текст) целиком

Ниже представлен текст книги, разбитый по страницам. Система сохранения места последней прочитанной страницы, позволяет с удобством читать онлайн бесплатно книгу «The Perversion of Knowledge», без необходимости каждый раз заново искать на чём Вы остановились. Поставьте закладку, и сможете в любой момент перейти на страницу, на которой закончили чтение.

Тёмная тема

Шрифт:

Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать
The original from December 1920 VCheKaKGB building at Lubyanka Dzerzhinsky - фото 2
The original (from December 1920) VCheKa-KGB building at Lubyanka (Dzerzhinsky) Square (before rebuilding), 1926. (Postcard from Rashit Yangirov Archive [Moscow])

According to the materials from the archive of a former OGPU/NKVD agent named Pavlovsky, the VCheKa/GPU financed its existence with bribes and smuggling and from confiscations during searches and arrests. This blatant criminality created a climate of corruption that has permeated the security service from its birth up to the present day. Special commissions for combating smuggling and bribery were used not only for their stated purpose but also to establish “green lines” for smuggled goods and bribes. Each secret agent was allowed to smuggle up to 200 gold rubles’ worth of goods into the country. In 1921, the VCheKa Administrative-Organizational Department (OAU) was put in charge of coordinating all financial activity (among other duties). This department supervised cinemas, restaurants, and show business in Moscow and Petrograd and ran its own chain of shops, which sold the belongings of arrested or executed persons. It also had branches abroad, such as a Soviet cinema in Berlin. 53

At the beginning of 1920, the plenipotentiary of the VCheKa Special Department (OO), 54Yakov Agranov, 55fabricated the first political show trial against the allegedly anti-Soviet Tactical Center group. Even though the task of the OO was to combat counterrevolution and spies in the Red Army, this show trial involved many scientists. In January 1920, the OO was headed by Dzerzhinsky himself, with Ivan Pavlunovsky (1888–1937) as deputy head. There were four “plenipotentiaries” within it, Vyacheslav Menzhinsky, Artur Artuzov (1891–1937), Karl Lander (1883–1937), and Yakov Agranov. The future NKVD commissar Genrikh Yagoda was in charge of administration; V. Gerson was the OO secretary.

During the preparation of the Tactical Center trial, principles and methods used in many future cases were developed. In February 1920, the VCheKa arrested a group of alleged counterrevolutionaries, two of whom, Professors Nikolai Vinogradsky and Sergei Kotlyarevsky, soon began to cooperate with Agranov’s team of investigators. They gave detailed testimonies against their imprisoned colleagues and even acted as stool pigeons. 56From August 16 through 20, 1920, the Supreme Revolutionary Tribunal, chaired by VCheKa deputy chairman Ivan Ksenofontov, heard the Tactical Center case in the hall of the Polytechnic Museum. The first Soviet general prosecutor, Nikolai Krylenko, 57claimed in his opening remarks: “During this court session we will deal with the trial of history against the activity of Russian intelligentsia.” 58

According to Krylenko and the official VCheKa version, 59the Tactical Center was a secret political organization that had been established in February 1919 and consisted of three clandestine groups: the Council of Men in Public Life (SOD), headed by Dmitrii Shchepkin and Sergei Leontiev; the National Center, headed by Nikolai Shchepkin and Sergei Trubetskoi; and the Union for the Regeneration of Russia, led by a historian, Sergei Melgunov. All the leaders had been professors and prominent politicians before the Bolshevik coup. Supposedly, the National Center was an underground military organization planning a military coup in Moscow. In fact, the VCheKa had only intercepted one letter from two liberal politicians, Myakotin and Fedotov, to one of the White movement leaders, General Anton Denikin, appealing for him to change his “policy in the agrarian, Jewish [i.e., to stop Jewish pogroms administered by the soldiers of Denikin’s army] and national questions.” 60The Petrograd branch of the National Center was also accused of contacts with the British spy Paul Dukes, a former assistant conductor of the Mariinsky (now Kirov) Theater who worked for British intelligence in Russia in 1918–1919. According to the VCheKa version, Dukes helped to finance the National Center’s groups in Moscow and Petrograd. 61Nothing of this sort is mentioned in Duke’s memoirs.

Before the trial, the VCheKa Special Department arrested 1,000 alleged members of the Tactical Center and investigated the case. The newspapers published a list of sixty-seven executed members of the National Center, including two of its leaders, Nikolai Shchepkin and the Moscow schoolteacher (gymnasium) Aleksandr Alfyorov, and Alfyorov’s wife, Aleksandra, also a teacher. Before being shot, Aleksandra Alfyorova managed to smuggle a letter written in prison to her pupils: 62

Dear girls!

My fate has been decided. I have the last request to you: continue to study as well as you did when I was alive. The Motherland will need your knowledge, never forget this. I wish you well and to have an honest and interesting life.

A. Alfyorova.

The Revolutionary Tribunal pronounced the Tactical Center guilty of plotting the overthrow of the Soviet state with a view to establish a military dictatorship under Admiral Aleksandr Kolchak, the former Arctic explorer who was leading the White forces in Siberia. 63However, Prosecutor Krylenko did not produce any proof that the center in fact existed. There was no program or membership lists, nor any coordinated plan of action. He demanded the death sentence for twenty-four defendants, including the geneticist Nikolai Koltsov, whose trial notes are discussed in Chapter 4. Leontiev, Dmitrii Shchepkin, Trubetskoi, and Melgunov were sentenced to death, for contact with the British spy Dukes, among other things.

Aleksandra Tolstaya, the youngest of the writer Leo Tolstoy’s daughters, who was also among the arrested, showed amazing self-composure during the trial and managed to get the best of Krylenko on at least one occasion, which she vividly described in her memoir:

“Citizen Tolstoi,” Krylenko asked me, “what was your role in the Tactical Center?”

“My role,” I answered in a loud voice, “my role consisted in heating the samovar for the members of the Tactical Center.”

“And serving tea?”

“Yes, and serving tea.”

“That was the only part you had in the business?”

“Yes.” 64

The audience laughed and the prosecutor was ruffled. Tolstaya was imprisoned for a few months in a Moscow monastery that had been turned into a concentration camp; she later emigrated to the United States, where she organized the Tolstoy Fund to help Russian immigrants.

To punish some of the defendants, Krylenko invented what became later known as “ sharashki, ” special institutions where imprisoned professionals worked according to their specialty: “Steiman, because of his profound legal knowledge, as well as Stempkovsky, because of his same knowledge in agriculture, should be put in a camp for two years, where they should be used as professionals according to the Regulations in the concentration camps.” 65However, Krylenko suggested releasing the prominent economist Nikolai Kondratiev. Later, in 1930, Kondratiev was arrested as an alleged leader of the other OGPU-invented Labor Peasant Party and sentenced in 1932 to eight years’ imprisonment. On September 17, 1938, he was resentenced to death and was shot immediately after the trial. 66

But in 1920 the grip of the Bolsheviks was not yet complete. Tolstaya recalled that on the last day of the trial, after Krylenko demanded the death sentence for five of the defendants, Leon Trotsky, then commissar of defense, suddenly appeared at the trial and spoke in favor of one of these defendants. 67It became known that on Lenin’s personal intervention, to whom many prominent and influential people appealed, the case against the center was closed. 68For the five defendants, the death sentence was instantly commuted to ten years’ imprisonment. The others were sentenced to various terms, and some were pardoned. Later, many of the defendants emigrated or were exiled abroad.

Читать дальше
Тёмная тема

Шрифт:

Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

Похожие книги на «The Perversion of Knowledge»

Представляем Вашему вниманию похожие книги на «The Perversion of Knowledge» списком для выбора. Мы отобрали схожую по названию и смыслу литературу в надежде предоставить читателям больше вариантов отыскать новые, интересные, ещё не прочитанные произведения.


John Steinbeck: A Russian Journal
A Russian Journal
John Steinbeck
Vadim Birstein: SMERSH
SMERSH
Vadim Birstein
Timothy Colton: Yeltsin
Yeltsin
Timothy Colton
Дональд Джеймс: The Fall of the Russian Empire
The Fall of the Russian Empire
Дональд Джеймс
Отзывы о книге «The Perversion of Knowledge»

Обсуждение, отзывы о книге «The Perversion of Knowledge» и просто собственные мнения читателей. Оставьте ваши комментарии, напишите, что Вы думаете о произведении, его смысле или главных героях. Укажите что конкретно понравилось, а что нет, и почему Вы так считаете.