Jeordie Meier - New chemistry and astrophysics – 2021

«Galaxions» are, in a sense, piece of soul of galaxy, in different galaxies are different «Galaxions», thanks to «Galaxion», galaxies do not merge into one large galaxy, if this particle were not there, then there would not be different galaxies, but there would be one large galaxy around the center of the universe. You can understand the role of «Galaxion» in more detail in the section where I will describe how galaxies and universe are born.

«Galaxion» is one of the first-born particles of galaxy, something like soul of galaxy.

Atoms and stars outside the galaxy are not born, which means that for their birth they need charge, some kind of special particle, I call it «Galaxion».

So I refuted theory that at very beginning cosmos consisted of quarks, in fact, quarks were born later from smaller particles.

Let’s go back to structure of atom

Gluons are formed during the decay of atom and immediately disappear, they do not disappear, they fly away.

Scientists should not try to catch gluons and split them, because this is part of body of universe, like its soul, if you destroy small piece of universe, it can lead to destruction of all life in space, like chain reaction.

Why scientists did not see this particle «Galaxion», perhaps they saw, but did not understand what is it or took it for electron.

If we analyze the nature of electron, then my logic builds such constructions. In different galaxies there are different particles" Galaxions», but they have something common, which means they consist of smaller particles. Аll galaxies have different electrons, they have different radiation, but electrons have something in common, this particle" Godeye».

If you think that I could not prove the existence of «Galaxion» particle, then here is the list of evidence.

1. In the center of galaxy there is substance that holds the gravity of stars around it, the core of star consists of heavy atom and particles of stardust, which means that the center of the galaxy also consists of heavy particles of stardust.

Logically, in all galaxies the core consists of the similar particles of stardust. We found out that these stardust are attracted to each other, forming a nucleus, then the centers of all galaxies should be attracted to each other, but no, there is some force that creates different points of attraction in cosmos around wich stardust gather to form the nucleus of galaxy. These points of attraction have different radiation, they have particles that are different from each other, but have a common property, they have an energy charge. I call these particles «Galaxions».

«Galaxions» as atoms have different structures and radiation, but they have a common microparticle in their composition, which attracts other particles to itself in different proportions, thus different types of «Galaxions» are formed.

..Yes, this is new information and it is difficult to accept it, but I am sure that none of scientists will ever create more logical theory.

– — —

*So calculating number of electrons, protons, neutrons in an atom according to the old system of Mendeleev will be erroneous, just like calculating the masses of protons and neutrons, especially since the periodic table of Mendeleev is one continuous error, there are very few real pure substances with full-fledged atoms, there is substances with defective atoms and different particles of stardust, or chemicals has not atoms at all.

This is what I found in a chemistry textbook. (How much magnesium and how many magnesium atoms are contained in a sample of pure magnesium weighing 6 grams? What is the mass of one magnesium atom?) Why torment the brain of people with this nonsense. Magnesium does not consist entirely of atoms, but you will never calculate the mass of atoms that are in it, because chemical elements are living structures and the number of atoms in them can change, they lose energy over time and turn into quarkrubbish.

You should not rely on periodic table of Mendeleev, it is not correct, not all elements in it are separate chemical elements, scientists have not yet learned how to fully separate pure atoms from matter.

What is full-fledged atom.

This is a stable atom, and not those mutants that scientists get in their laboratories and that live for 20 seconds, an example of atom Nichunium. Perhaps he live not for 20 seconds, but he simply fell and disappeared from the field of view and later collapsed in a couple of hours, because he did not have enough energy due to absence of some element in him. Or he has defect in structure of its quarks, and this destroyed the entire chain. In any case, structure living for 20 seconds is not atom. Need to learn distinguish normal atom from defective one by vibrations that it emits, normal one has stable vibration, and inferior atom emits chaotic waves, like radiation.

This is a fake, they failed to create atom, atom is stable unit, it does not decay by itself within 20 seconds like Japanese Nihunium, they collided Zinc with 30 protons and Bismuth with 83 protons (we already found out that number of protons in chemical elements in periodic table is wrong), as result, they attributed 113 electrons and protons to Nichunium. This is genius. Firstly, no one has ever counted the exact number of protons and electrons of Zinc and Bismuth in microscope, this is speculative data, so there are definitely not 113 electrons in this under-atom of Nichunium, and secondly, they did not take into account the sterility of container in which they cooked their soup of atoms, for sure there were particles from previous experiments: atoms of oxygen, hydrogen, plus reaction with material of which their container made, plus i don’t think that Bismuth consists of full-fledged atoms, there are no full-fledged atoms with nucleus- center that is filled with energy and creates an attraction.

Scientists who create new atoms in their laboratories openly say that their atoms are destroyed after a while, lose energy. Вut why then no one says that atoms in the matter around us can also be destroyed due to energy loss and turn into quark mass. And thus, chemical elements are not made entirely of atoms.

Chemists say that all chemical elements consist of the same particles, supposedly they differ only in their internal ststructure. But this is not so, different chemical elements consist of different particles, in lead there are particles that are not in oxygen.

And how did the ancient scientists arrange the elements in the periodic table of Mendeleev? They weighed all substances they discovered, calculated their estimated atomic weight, and arranged them in ascending order by weight.

Now imagine in what conditions this happened, these scientists were half-crazy disabled, because most likely they did not use any means of protection in working with toxic substances (mercury, lead, and so on), these substances poison the body and destroy nervous system, people go crazy with these substances, and now half-mad scientist takes substance not completely purified from foreign impurities and weighs it.

Plus on earth and most likely in this galaxy not all chemicals are present in the order 1,2,3,4,5,6,7.. electrons in atom, many atoms are not on the planet, they are either too precious or too dangerous. So new chemical periodic table will have empty cells that we will never fill. The set of atoms on the planet is, in sense, an accident.

Need also carefully study and describe each chemical element of periodic table, what it really is. It is necessary to remove from table of Mendeleev the molecular weight of elements and numbers that indicate the quantity of electrons. Mendeleev’s table will become just a list of chemicals with which people deals.