Коллектив авторов - Пособие по общественным связям в науке и технологиях

Bucchi, M. (1998) Science and the Media: Alternative Routes in Scientific Communication , London and New York: Routledge.

Bucchi, M. (2008) ‘Of deficits, deviations and dialogues: theories of public communication of science’, in M. Bucchi and B. Trench (eds) Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology , London and New York: Routledge, 57–76.

Bucchi, M. (2009) Beyond Technocracy: Science, Politics and Citizens , New York: Springer.

Bucchi, M. (2010) Scientisti e antiscientisti. Perché scienza e società non si capiscono , Bologna: il Mulino.

Bucchi, M. (2013) ‘Style in science communication’, Public Understanding of Science , 22, 8: 904–915.

Bucchi, M. (2014) ‘Norms, competition and visibility in contemporary science: the legacy of Robert K. Merton’, Journal of Classical Sociology.

Bucchi, M. and F. Neresini (2011) ‘Which indicators for the new public engagement activities? An exploratory study of European research institution’, Public Understanding of Science , 20, 1: 64–79.

Callon, M. (1999) ‘The role of lay people in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge’, Science, Technology and Society , 4, 1: 81–94.

Callon, M., P. Lascoumes and Y. Barthe (2001) Agir Dans un Monde Incertain. Essai sur la Démocratie Technique , Paris: Editions du Seuil.

Davies, S., E. McCallie, E. Simonsson, L. Lehr and S. Duensing (2008) ‘Discussing dialogue: perspectives on the value of science dialogue events that do not inform policy’, Public Understanding of Science , 18, 3: 338–353.

Delfanti, A. (2013) Biohackers – The Politics of Open Science , London: Pluto Books.

Dornan, C. (1990) ‘Some problems in conceptualising the issue of “science in the media”’, Critical Studies in Media Communication , 7, 1: 48–71.

Durant, J. (1993) ‘What is scientific literacy?’ in J. Durant and J. Gregory (eds) Science and Culture in Europe , London: Science Museum, 29–138.

Durodié, B. (2003) ‘Limitations of public dialogue in science and the rise of the new “experts”’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy , 6, 4: 82–92.

Einsiedel, E. (2000) ‘Understanding “publics” in public understanding of science’, in M. Dierckes and C. von Grote (eds) Between Understanding and Trust: The Public, Science and Technology , London and New York: Routledge, 205–215.

Epstein, S. (1995) ‘The construction of lay expertise: AIDS, activism and the forging of credibility in the reform of clinical trials’, Science, Technology and Human Values , 20, 4: 408–437.

Ezrahi, Y. (1990) The Descent of Icarus , Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Gieryn, T. (1998) ‘Balancing acts: science, Enola Gay and history wars at the Smithsonian’, in S. Macdonald (ed.) The Politics of Display: Museums, Science, Culture , London: Routledge, 197–227.

Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , Garden City: Doubleday.

Goodell, R. (1977) The Visible Scientists , Boston: Little, Brown.

Grundmann, R. (2013) ‘“Climategate” and the scientific ethos’, Science, Technology and Human Values , 38, 1: 67–93.

Hilgartner, S. (1990) ‘The dominant view of popularisation: conceptual problems, political uses’, Social Studies of Science , 20, 3: 519–539.

Horst, M. (2012) ‘Deliberation, dialogue or dissemination: changing objectives in the communication of science and technology in Denmark’, in B. Schiele, M. Claessens and S. Shi (eds) Science Communication in the World: Practices, Theories and Trends , Dordrecht: Springer, 95–108.

House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology (2000) Science and Technology: Third Report , London: Stationery Office, at http://www.parliament.the-stationeryoffice.co.uk/pa/ld199900/ldselect/ldsctech/38/3801.htm.

Kuhn, T. S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Lévy-Leblond, J-M. (1996) La Pierre de Touche – la science a l’épreuve , Paris: Gallimard.

Lewenstein, B. (2008) ‘Popularisation’, in J. L. Heilbron (ed.) The Oxford Companion to the History of Modern Science , Oxford: Oxford University Press: 667–668.

Lightman, B. (2007) Victorian Popularizers of Science. Designing Nature for New Audiences , Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Merton, R. K. (1973) The Sociology of Science , Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Metlay, G. (2006) ‘Reconsidering renormalisation: stability and change in 20th-century views on university patents’, Social Studies of Science , 36, 4: 565–597.

Miller, S. (2001) ‘Public understanding of science at the crossroads’, Public Understanding of Science , 10, 1: 115–120.

Miller, S., Caro, P., Koulaidis, V., de Semir, V., Staveloz, W. and Vargas, R. (2002) Report from the Expert Group, Benchmarking the Promotion of RTD Culture and Public Understanding of Science , Brussels: European Commission.

Miller, S., D. Fahy and ESConet Team (2009) ‘Can science communication workshops train scientists for reflexive public engagement?’, Science Communication , 31, 1: 116–126.

Peters, H. P., Heinrichs, H., Jung, A., Kallfass, M. and Petersen, I. (2008) ‘Medialisation of science as a prerequisite of its legitimisation and political relevance’, in D. Cheng, M. Claessens, T. Gascoigne, J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele and S. Shi (eds) Science Communication in Social Contexts: New Models, New Practices , Dordrecht: Springer, 71–92.

Phillips, L., A. Carvalho and J. Doyle (eds) (2012) Citizen Voices: Performing Public Participation in Science and Environment Communication , Bristol and Chicago: Intellect.

Raichvarg, D. and J. Jacques (1991) Savants et Ignorants – une histoire de la vulgarisation de la science , Paris: Seuil.

Raza, G. and S. Singh (2013) ‘Science communication in India at a crossroads, yet again’, in P. Baranger and B. Schiele (eds) Science Communication Today: International Perspectives, Issues and Strategies , Paris: CNRS Éditions, 243–262.

Riise, J. (2008) ‘Bringing science to the public’, in D. Cheng, M. Claessens, T. Gascoigne, J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele and S. Shi (eds) Communicating Science in Social Contexts: New Models, New Practices , Dordrecht: Springer, 301–310.

Rödder, S., M. Franzen and P. Weingart (eds) (2012) The Sciences’ Media Connection: Public Communication and its Repercussions, Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook , Springer: Dordrecht.

Snow, C. P. (1959) The Two Cultures , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sturgis, P. and N. Allum (2005) ‘Science in society: re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes’, Public Understanding of Science , 13, 1: 55–74.

Trench, B. (2008a) ‘Internet: turning science communication inside-out?’, in M. Bucchi and B. Trench (eds) Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology , London and New York: Routledge, 185–194.

Trench, B. (2008b) ‘Towards an analytical framework of science communication models’, in D. Cheng, M. Claessens, T. Gascoigne, J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele and S. Shi (eds) Communicating Science in Social Contexts: New Models, New Practices , Dordrecht: Springer, 119–138.

Trench, B. (2012) ‘Scientists’ blogs: glimpses behind the scenes’, in S. Rödder, M. Franzen and P. Weingart (eds) The Sciences’ Media Connection: Public Communication and Its Repercussions, Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook , Dordrecht: Springer, 273–290.