Alexander Borodin - Non vowel resources of some good mood

Some of the advice of various ideologists on how to go through life for some people is absolutely unacceptable, especially for causing physical harm to themselves and possible death in connection with this. They completely contradict, to put it mildly, the rules in terms of healthy lifestyle (healthy lifestyle), so you can read for fun in order to know what you do not need to do in life. We remember that they themselves are not in a hurry to inflict physical harm on themselves and live to a very old age.

There are beliefs that harm their carriers and are usually aimed at young people, since they are easy to manipulate, because some young people want something global. Therefore, all the «downloads» can be clearly divided into harmful and useful for a psychologically and physiologically healthy lifestyle and understand where harmful and where useful come from. Harmful always come from a manipulator, looking, as already mentioned, for a better person,carefully study this issue and make sure that it is so, you can suffer from some tips. Some people in the service of the geopolitical opponents of your state create people with psychological discomfort to «undermine» the system and do what is called the monopolar world, and it’s not profitable for any person, because when there is one world state, they’ll end all rights and freedoms, why – will be indicated below in the material.

We move away from the global and return to everyday life. Here is an example of how the author’s acquaintance «recouped» within the framework of the law after a neighbor made a fake call to law enforcement agencies. He didn’t go and beat anyone, he simply started recalling the «sins» of the neighbor and also voicing them to law enforcement officers, and the «sins» of the neighbor were as follows: he walked the dog in the wrong place, was engaged in illegal entrepreneurial activity (he was selling cars) and did not pay tax on this, arbitrarily built a warehouse under the staircase of the apartment building – this was already reported not in the Ministry of Internal Affairs, but in the BTI and in the Ministry of Emergencies, since the construction was illegal, it had to be removed.

Lyrics: they say that in the old days it was possible to go to the camp for denunciation – in those days it was not the evidence base that proved the guilt of anyone, but the «naked» fact of the accusation of the accused, and therefore they could go to jail for a long time after denouncing the neighbor.

By the way, the blood feud was present in the cultures of some peoples – from a scientific point of view, revenge is a justifiable action: one species harms another, and then those whom it harmed harm, since it endangered the physical survival of the one it harmed.

Also, a person seeks to isolate himself in the microworld from those who interfere with his life – destroying pathogenic microbes, without experiencing the slightest sentimentality to them. Why? Because they did not inspire pity for them, and if inspired, how paradoxical it sounds, would he really suffer when he would kill pathogens in himself?

«You may not be a poet, but you must be a citizen,» the work «Poet and Citizen,» N. A. Nekrasov.

Reporting a violation of the law is not a crime or an offense, moreover, it is the civil duty of every citizen, and in some cases the direct duty of everyone, without exception, when it comes to crimes belonging to the category of grave or especially grave, in this case, failure to report may occur criminal liability.

The motto on the website of psychological operations is www.psywarrior.com: «Capture their minds and their hearts and souls will follow.» (Sample translation: «Take hold of their mind, and their hearts and souls will follow.»)

Do you need to forget about physical strength in solving any issues? Is modern classical psychology a psychology forbidding people to protect themselves, or is it not so? Is real psychology not just when they say it, but «clash» – only in a psychological sense? Is a real psychologist one who has let everything through life through himself, or maybe a person who hasn’t let anything through himself, except for lectures and books about psychology? Everyone himself is involuntarily a participant in a social experiment and a psychology researcher? To survive, it is not enough for a person to just satisfy his needs for food and other instincts, like in an animal – should his interests, inherent only to man, which animals do not have, be satisfied? The animal unconsciously understands why it is here – it satisfies its instincts, well, but a person needs to do something and love it almost as much as life, otherwise a person does not understand why he is here? What is freedom – is it the possibility of realization of sexual and other instincts, the realization of emotions, or is freedom freedom from the presence of the same instincts and emotions, that is, their absence, is such a dissonance obtained? What freedom can there be if people have a dependence on their biological nature, that is, on instincts? The less instincts and emotions, or if they are, but not pronounced, is it easier to live? Some of this is 50% of the animal (meaning instincts) and 50% of the person (meaning intelligence)? Maybe it’s 60, 70, 80, 90, or even 100% human, and only 40, 30, 20, or 0% an animal, or vice versa, and what happens when something is more and something less? We determine by those places that a person visits, what is more in it – from an animal or from a person? The more you have from the animal, the more dangerous you are in modern society for yourself and others and the more difficult it is for you to integrate into society in a country that is considered civilized? Are all human actions predictable, since they stem from instincts and other well-known needs? If someone at the time of any domestic conflict was drunk, legally he will always be to blame – since a drunk animal is 100% (this is not an insult, but a comparison), and the less sober someone differs from an animal, the more he becomes when drunk? Why do people behave this way and not otherwise – the problem is in physiology? Two days off a week is given to a person to fulfill the needs programmed into him by higher forces, the rest 5 days a week he is engaged in fulfilling the needs of others through him? If a person is not allowed to realize his basic needs, will his psyche «overheat»? I don’t have to act logically, and where to find places where illogical acts will not negatively affect my life – is it possible only in rich countries with good social packages, in other cases illogical acts are a luxury that is fraught with bad consequences?

According to documentaries, such a Soviet surgeon as Nikolai Amosov owns the following phrases: «Man is an animal, since he has biological needs,» «Man is an animal, only with intelligence.»

«… You will make a lot of discoveries, not wanting it yourself …”, – a phrase from the song by Ostap Bender (Andrei Mironov), the film «12 Chairs» of the 1978 version of the USSR (there is also the film «12 Chairs», shot in 1971 in the USSR).

Empiricism is the experience gained in practice – eyes, ears, nose, mouth and skin, in a word, sensory organs? Everyone, in order to survive, uses his life experience, if you do not use it or if it is not there, you can weaken and die? In difficult times and in times of change, do some always have a greater need for coaches and psychics to create pink hurt? Is the industry making money on experience a profitable thing? Everywhere only «cargo», «cargo», «cargo», «cargo» of those who live at the expense of «cargo», and no material assistance? I won’t give money, but will I teach life?

«… and now you need to think with your own brains, and the people are not used to it, he immediately, like a cow on ice, out of the blue… people will begin to move in bundles with their minds…» – exemplary words about the prospects of creating private insane asylums during the changes of one of the heroes of the comedy film «A Nightmare in a Madhouse», USSR, 1990, directed by Nikolai Gusarov.