Ron Rosenbaum - How the End Begins

Здесь есть возможность читать онлайн «Ron Rosenbaum - How the End Begins» весь текст электронной книги совершенно бесплатно (целиком полную версию без сокращений). В некоторых случаях можно слушать аудио, скачать через торрент в формате fb2 и присутствует краткое содержание. Город: New York, Год выпуска: 2011, ISBN: 2011, Издательство: Simon & Schuster, Inc., Жанр: Публицистика, История, Политика, на английском языке. Описание произведения, (предисловие) а так же отзывы посетителей доступны на портале библиотеки ЛибКат.

How the End Begins: краткое содержание, описание и аннотация

Предлагаем к чтению аннотацию, описание, краткое содержание или предисловие (зависит от того, что написал сам автор книги «How the End Begins»). Если вы не нашли необходимую информацию о книге — напишите в комментариях, мы постараемся отыскать её.

T This is how the end begins.
In this startling new book, bestselling author Ron Rosenbaum gives us a wake-up call about this new age of peril and delivers a provocative analysis of how close—and how often—the world has come to nuclear annihilation and why we are once again on the brink.
Rosenbaum tracks down key characters in our new nuclear drama and probes deeply into their war game strategies, fears, and moral agonies. He travels to Omaha’s underground nuclear command center, goes deep into the missile silo complexes beneath the Great Plains, and holds in his hands a set of nuclear launch keys.
Along the way, Rosenbaum confronts the missile men as well as the general at the very top of our nation’s nuclear command system with tough questions about the terrifying assumptions underlying it. He reveals disturbing Haws in our nuclear launch control system, suggests remedies for them, shows how the old Cold War system of bipolar deterrence has become dangerously unstable, and examines the new movement for nuclear abolition.
Having explored the depths of Hitler’s evil and the intense emotion of Shakespeare’s tragedies, Rosenbaum now has produced a powerful, urgently needed work that challenges us: Can we undream our nightmare?

How the End Begins — читать онлайн бесплатно полную книгу (весь текст) целиком

Ниже представлен текст книги, разбитый по страницам. Система сохранения места последней прочитанной страницы, позволяет с удобством читать онлайн бесплатно книгу «How the End Begins», без необходимости каждый раз заново искать на чём Вы остановились. Поставьте закладку, и сможете в любой момент перейти на страницу, на которой закончили чтение.

Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

On the other hand we don’t know what secret communications about the situation had been conveyed to the Russians in addition to Hadley’s public statement. We may have made it clear that arming the SS-26s with nuclear warheads would risk turning the confrontation into a nuclear standoff, or that we were aware of their nukes but were prepared to match them if the Russians rolled over the rest of Georgia as it looked for a day or so they might. The fact they didn’t take advantage of this easy opportunity to eliminate a thorn in their side might be an indication that it was they who were deterred.

The SS-26s have surfaced more than once in the last three years. [278]Just hours after Obama was elected president, Russia announced it would base them within range of our planned missile defense site in Poland. This move was meant to “neutralize” the planned missile defense system that the Bush administration had wanted to deploy in Eastern Europe. Was it deterrence that caused the Obama administration to abandon the Polish interceptor plan?

Both the Bush and Obama Pentagon have stated repeatedly that the defensive shield is designed to protect the continent from missiles launched from rogue states, such as Iran. But Moscow rejects that argument, claiming that the system is actually aimed at Russia. So Russia also made it clear in December 2009 that it had plans to jam a radar located in the Czech Republic used to detect in-bound missiles and intended to guide the projected Polish-based interceptors. The Bush plan was thankfully revoked [279]when Obama came into office, (but replaced by a sea-based system and a Romanian land-based interceptor installation, that are no less objectionable to the Russians) and that may have been Putin and Medvedev’s intention all along. The Russians were clearly mounting a challenge to Bush’s successor, who has said he is opposed to “unproven” missile defense systems. The Associated Press story describing the nuclear brinkmanship was a concatenation of Cold War clichés: “In some respects,” it said, “the SS-26 movement to Kaliningrad [the Russian outpost closest to the proposed Polish interceptor base] is the first ‘shot across the bow’ of the incoming administration. Moscow is waiting to see if Obama has ‘steel in his spine,’ and will stand up to a deliberate Russian provocation. So are our Eastern European allies, who wonder if the new president will stand with them against the Russian bear.” [280]

These are strong words: “Shot across the bow,” “steel in his spine,” “stand with them against the Russian bear.” World War III is back in words if not yet in deed.

When I asked Colonel Gardiner what he’d learned about war-gaming over the years of engaging in it, he told me that it often comes down to finding out “What is the killer question.”

He gave an example from his experience in war game exercises he participated in during the Cold War: “Could the Belgian core hold?” The Belgian core was the weak spot in the north–south dividing line between NATO and the Warsaw Pact powers. The geographical weak spot. The likely attack point.

Would we have the credibility to convince the Soviets that we could hold the Belgian core with conventional forces without having to resort to nukes to stop a breakthrough?

Colonel Gardiner had a fascinating account of how we sought to make the Soviets believe that our Fifth Corps would “move up to reinforce the Seventh Corps” in holding the Belgian core, thus discouraging the Warsaw Pact from focusing its forces on the apparent weakness. The killer question was: did they believe us? Apparently. According to Gardiner, we leaked plans through a spy that we’d make that move, thereby implying that we were inviting them into a trap. Then we acted out the move during a war game exercise Gardiner participated in and incorporated the Seventh Corps deception into our actual war plan. “Deception was the essence of credibility,” was his way of summing it up.

But in terms of today’s war-gaming the new nuclear age flashpoints, Gardiner was most concerned about the urgency of the Pakistan problem. “You want to know where the Pakistani nukes are? I can show you on Google maps,” he said.

“You mean they’re not exactly secure.”

“What do you think?” he said.

In the Iranian-American war game Gardiner ran for The Atlantic magazine, [281]the killer question was whether Iran would credibly retaliate against an American attack on its nuclear facilities. Or would they refrain because any retaliation would certainly bring on the kind of obliteration promised Iran by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who used that formulation in one of the primary debates. She was referring to our willingness to provide Israel with a nuclear umbrella: a pledge to obliterate Iran if it nuked Israel.

In that war game, the conclusion was that Iran would retaliate, in the Persian Gulf, taking out U.S. aircraft carriers and battleships with Chinese Silkworm missiles, obliterating shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, destroying the Saudi oil refineries and with them much of the West’s energy supplies, not to mention—depending on the time frame—sending a Shehab-3 ballistic missile or two or more heading toward Israel, Western Europe, and, for all we knew, the Western Hemisphere as well. [282]The fact that some of the best-informed Western experts on Iran discounted the potency of deterrence is an ominous indication that a global nuclear war could erupt from supposed surgical strikes on Iran.

Syria however, was deterred on the night of September 6, 2007. An attack on its territory left a key nearly completed nuclear facility of some kind obliterated and the Syrians were silent. And the Iranians may have had some kind of mutual defense pact with the Syrians, but did nothing. The Syrians are known to possess missiles with the capacity to deliver chemical weapons into the heart of Israel’s major cities and they didn’t use them because, they knew—they were deterred by—Israeli nuclear capacity to leave Damascus a radioactive ruin.

The night we came so close to World War III we danced on the knife’s edge of deterrence and lived to see another day. But what if things had played out just a little bit differently?

When I think about the Enigmatic Box and the close call it represented I can’t help thinking of Pandora’s box, which, in the myth, when opened against warnings, released all the evils of the world. At the bottom of Pandora’s box of course there was said to be one remaining thing: hope. Did the events of April 2010 recounted in the next chapter represent hope? That’s the killer question.

CHAPTER NINE

ENDGAME

THE SURPRISING REBIRTH OF ZERO

Hope springs eternal; but so does false hope. President Barack Obama and Russian president Dmitri Medvedev finally signed the much delayed “follow-on” of the START treaty—“New START” as the optimistic Obama press releases called it. But the treaty was a tacit recognition that nukes are here to stay. It leaves thousands of them on hair-trigger alert and perpetuates the ideology at the heart of deterrence theory: threaten genocide to prevent genocide. The day before the president departed for the Prague signing, the Pentagon released the first Obama administration Nuclear Posture Review (or NPR), [283]a fifty-page document whose departure from the previous one by the Bush administration was hailed by some for its stated intention to make nuclear weapons less central to U.S. military strategy. But it was a rhetorical reset rather than a breakaway from the straitjacket of deterrence theory. “A status quo document,” Bruce Blair told the Wall Street Journal . [284]In fact, both the treaty and the NPR were status quo documents that left open the question of whether the status quo was sustainable.

Читать дальше
Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

Похожие книги на «How the End Begins»

Представляем Вашему вниманию похожие книги на «How the End Begins» списком для выбора. Мы отобрали схожую по названию и смыслу литературу в надежде предоставить читателям больше вариантов отыскать новые, интересные, ещё непрочитанные произведения.


Отзывы о книге «How the End Begins»

Обсуждение, отзывы о книге «How the End Begins» и просто собственные мнения читателей. Оставьте ваши комментарии, напишите, что Вы думаете о произведении, его смысле или главных героях. Укажите что конкретно понравилось, а что нет, и почему Вы так считаете.

x