Marcus King - The War Against Putin

On NGO activity & puppet politicians:

“Direct or indirect external interference in our internal political processes is unacceptable. Any person who receives money from abroad for his or her political activity and by doing so serves alien national interests, cannot be a politician in Russia.” {62} 62 Search Term: Putin, interference in our internal political processes is unacceptable

It is no wonder that the left over Communists of Russia (about a 15% minority) along with the Western “wannabee” NGO radicals (about a 10% minority) are generally opposed to Putin. With quotes like those listed above, along with actions and results to back them up, one would think that the “free market” Republican Party would love Vladimir Putin. Instead, they (as well as the Democrats) deride him as “ex KGB”, or “a commie”, or a “thug”.

But Putin is not just about “dollars and cents”. He is a man of culture with a grasp of history. As such, he understood the importance of moral underpinnings for a healthy and strong society. Without imposing Russia’ Orthodox Christian heritage on anyone, Putin has nonetheless worked side-by-side with the Church’s Patriarch to bring about a revival of the institution that had been suppressed for so long. Literally 1000’s of Churches have been rebuilt across Russia.

Putin on Christianity:

“Orthodox Christianity has always played a special role in shaping our statehood, our culture, our morals. The Church may be separate from the State. But in the soul and history of our people, it is all together. It always has been and always will be.” {63} 63 Search Term: Putin, Orthodox Christianity has always played a special role

On the West’s moral decline:

“Many Euro-Atlantic countries have moved away from their roots, including Christian values. Policies are being pursued that place on the same level a multi-child family and a same-sex partnership, a faith in God and a belief in Satan. This is the path to degradation.” {64} 64 Search Term: Putin, Euro-Atlantic countries have moved away from their roots

On family and population decline:

“It is important that families make that step… I am convinced that the norm in Russia should become a family with three children.” {65} 65 Search Term: Putin, the norm in Russia should become a family with three children

Indeed, by 2012, Putin’s Russia had reversed its suicidal 25 year depopulation trend and can today boast of what no Western nation can; a natural “baby boomlet” driven population growth that is not reliant upon Third World immigration. {66} 66 Search Term: Russia positive birth rate

Abortions after the 3 rdmonth of pregnancy have been outlawed; {67} 67 Search Term: Putin abortion laws a restriction that even many “pro-choicers” in America, would probably agree with. In the West, most nations actually allow babies to be aborted anytime during the 9 thmonth of pregnancy.

Russian law now mandates that all school children receive Moral Education training. The genius of this program is that the parents across multi-ethnic Russia are given a choice as to how to fulfill the requirement. The Moral Education requirement may be completed under the traditional instruction of Orthodox Christianity, or a Jewish rabbi, or a Muslim Cleric, or a Buddhist Priest. For the secularly inclined, a Secular Ethics curriculum is also available. So, whether Christian, Jew, Muslim, Buddhist, Agnostic, or Atheist, the child will be required to learn the timeless universal basics of moral conduct common to all faiths. {68} 68 Search Term: Russia religion and secular ethics training in schools

Putin has also made Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s classic Gulag Archipelago mandatory reading for Russian High School students. {69} 69 Search Term: Gulag Archipelago mandatory in Russian schools How ironic that most students in “anti Communist” America will never hear of Stalin’s atrocities while Russian kids will! Prior to his death in 2008, the anti-Communist literary legend praised Putin’s accomplishments:

“Putin inherited a ransacked and bewildered country, with a poor and demoralized people, and he started to do what was possible, slow and gradual restoration. These efforts were not noticed, nor appreciated, immediately. In any case, one is hard-pressed to find examples in history when steps by one country to restore its strength were met favorably by other governments.” {70} 70 Search Term: Solzhenitsyn’s Putin inherited a ransacked and bewildered country

By the final year of Putin’s initial Presidential tenure, 2008, Russia was strong and revitalized. Russia’s recovery was impressive enough to win the International Committee’s selection process to host the 2012 Winter Olympic Games. That would never have been possible under the ruinous reign of Yeltsin and the Oligarchs.

Under the Russian Constitution, Putin cold not serve three terms consecutively. He would be the Prime Minister for the next four year while his handpicked replacement Dmitri Medvedev served as President. The Globalists wasted little time in testing the new kid on the block.

The first true test of the resolve of revitalized Russia came during the Summer Olympics of 2008; held in Beijing, China. Putin and Bush were both present at the spectacular Opening Ceremonies. It was that very day, August 7, that the newly militarized puppet Georgia launched a large-scale military offensive against the Russian quasi protectorates of South Ossetia, in an attempt to reclaim the territory. South Ossetia, and later Abkhazia, were completely overrun. The incident followed the visit of the US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice (CFR) to Georgia, where she pledged her support for Georgia’s bid to join NATO.

It is inconceivable that Georgian puppet leader Mikheil Saakashvili would have undertaken such a bold venture without the blessing of his US master. As the world was distracted by the Opening Ceremonies and the historic games which followed, news of Georgia’s aggression was blacked out by the American press. As many as 2000 civilians were brutally murdered by US/Israeli backed Georgians {71} 71 Search Term: Georgian atrocities against Ossetia before Prime Minister Putin (still the true leader of Russia) could rush back from China and respond to the situation. And respond he did.

The Russian counter invasion was quick and professional. The Georgian amateurs were routed and driven back deep into Georgia. Then, and only then, did the Western press suddenly take notice of events in Georgia. “Putin Invades Georgia!” shrieked the TV talking heads and Yellow Journals of America. Brzezinski himself added his two cents; comparing Putin to, you guessed it, “Hitler”. But the provocative tragic events preceding the Russia-Georgia conflict were conveniently omitted from the media’s false narrative. Typical!