Marcus King - The War Against Putin

Concurrent with NATO expansion and the CFR-Oligarch financial rape, a host of well funded NGO’s (Non Governmental Organizations) were setting up shop in the new Russia, as well as in the former Republics of the defunct Soviet Union. Billions of dollars were pumped into these subversive organizations with high-sounding names. George Soros, the US State Department, the CIA, and the Oligarchs were all supporting this effort. Any Russian school child now knows this today; but tell it to some ‘Boobus Ignoramus Americanus” and he may call you a “commie” or, worse yet, a “conspiracy theorist.”

Ostensibly, the purpose of the NGO’s was to promote “Western Values” and “Democracy” and “Human Rights” to the people of the fledgling Russian nation. Many well meaning Russian activists flocked to these CIA front groups. After all, who can be opposed to “democracy” and “human rights”? Some shady Russian operatives were also attracted to the NGO’s for other reasons; such as money, or the hope of future political power.

Recall that during the late 1980’s, NGO’s had played a critical role in bringing about the ‘Velvet Revolutions” which brought down the governments of Eastern Europe. The destabilizing power of organized protesters from within plus external pressure from the sanctimonious hypocrites of “the Internal Community” (bow your head in reverence as you say those words) , from without, form a powerful pincer movement that can be just as effective at toppling governments as a military invasion.

Globalist Insiders refer to these types of maneuvers as “Soft Power”; a concept developed during the 1980’s by Professor Joseph Nye (CFR) of Harvard University, and spelled out in his 2004 book, Soft Power: The Means To Success In World Politics . {47} 47 Search Term: Soft power NGOs

The tell signs of a “soft power” CIA-NGO engineered “spontaneous” protest/“color Revolution” may consist of some or all of the following:

• 10’s of 1000’s, or even 100’s of 1000’s of “protesters” appearing out of nowhere

• Professionally made banners, placards, T-shirts, often written in English

• A social media onslaught against the target government (Twitter, Facebook)

• A Hollywood theme (Rose Revolution, Orange Revolution, Tulip Revolution)

• Intense coverage of the protests in the Western media

• An outbreak of violence, trigged by provocateurs, but blamed on the government

• The appearance of fake blood stains on the heads of some “peaceful protesters”

• Plastic “Guy Fawkes” masks (the movie “V for Vendetta”) worn by protesters

• Staged photos of women being pepper-sprayed by uniformed officers

• Images of allegedly battered protesters on the Nightly News

• Calls from the US and EU to stop the abuse of the “peaceful protesters”

• Threats of economic sanctions from the US and EU

• Intense internal & external pressure for the targeted government to step down

Variations of this dirty game have been run, and re-run more times than an old episode of “I Love Lucy”. Thanks to your intrepid author, you will now recognize future episodes of the NGO scam for what they really are.

Some of the “Soft Power” NGO’s that had invaded the weakened Russia included: The National Endowment for Democracy, USAID, Amnesty International and the Open Society Foundations; to name but a few. The larger NGO’s in turn funded a network of smaller NGO’s and local activists. Again, not all followers of these NGO related groups are bad people or traitors. They don’t need to be in order for the strategy to be effective.

What the string-pullers need is to be able to draw a large number of idealistic dupes into their controlled “causes”. When necessary, rent-a-mobs can be mobilized to “take to the streets” or Main Square at any given time. Impressionable, idealistic college students and union members are usually the most easily manipulated elements of the necessary flash mobs. Only a handful may even be even aware that the mob is being skillfully guided by Intelligence operatives. Those who really believe that they are part of some historic “people power” movement that will “change the world” would never believe you if you told them what fools they were!

Like colonies of termites, the NGO’s set about their dirty work of the internal subversion and corruption of Russia. Russian school officials were dismayed upon discovering that new NGO-funded textbooks barely mentioned the historic Battle of Stalingrad; while containing a page on US Presidents instead! {48} 48 Search Term: You Tube the unknown Putin These were the types of dirty “pro-democracy” tricks going on inside of Russia; all the while NATO continued rolling eastward and poor Russia continued dying.

On December 31, 1999, Boris Yeltsin unexpectedly resigned after 8 disastrous years in office. He left office with an approval rating as low as 2%! {49} 49 Search Term: Yeltsin’s final approval rating Though a drunkard and a crook, Yeltsin had probably never intended for historic Mother Russia to be destroyed and dismantled. Even a degenerate scoundrel will retain some shred of patriotism. Perhaps to atone for his folly, Yeltsin had pre-positioned a young “straight-arrow” type that he had earlier promoted to be Director of the FSB (Russian Security) . The disciplined young patriot would immediately succeed Yeltsin upon his resignation.

His name was Vladimir Putin.

Within 3 months of succeeding Yeltsin, Putin went onto win a special 2000 election with 53% of the vote. Again, there is no exaggerating the degree of the mess which he had inherited. The first order of business for the ex FSB Director and Judo Black Belt was to confront the Oligarchs. Of course, the rookie President was not yet in any position to crush these Western backed masters of Russia. So he had to play a bit of chess first.