William Bernhardt - Dark Justice

“Excuse me, Doctor. Normal skin fluoresces under a blue light. Damaged skin doesn’t. Right?”

Grayson tilted his head. “It seems you’re better informed than I realized, Mr. Kincaid.”

“Well, I try.”

“It is true that damaged skin doesn’t fluoresce.”

“And the bite wound you examined was extremely damaged, wasn’t it?”

“I was just mentioning that by way of example. My technique does not rely on skin fluorescence.”

“What does it rely on?”

“Well … of course, that’s very complicated.”

“Is there a book I could read on the subject? Some kind of documentation? ’Cause I have to tell you, I’ve looked, and I didn’t find any.”

“I … I have not published my research.”

“Because you want to keep this cash cow to yourself?”

Granny rocketed up. “Your honor!”

Pickens’s teeth were tightly clenched. “Mr. Kincaid, I will not put up with this abusive conduct in my courtroom!”

“Sorry, sorry. I’m just trying to determine why this pioneering scientific research has not been published.”

“I submitted it for publication,” Grayson said. “Three different medical journals. They all declined to publish.”

“Because they all thought it was a lot of hooey, right?” Ben looked up quickly. “That’s a scientific technical term, your honor.”

Pickens grunted his reply.

Grayson made a small coughing noise. “I attribute their hesitance more to professional jealousy.”

“Professional jealousy?”

“You have to understand-there still tends to be a bit of the ivory tower in the scientific community. Research is supposed to be pure; if it becomes profitable, then it’s tainted. Or so some believe. And as you pointed out yourself, my research has become quite profitable.”

Ben nodded. “I see. Is that why you were drummed out of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences?”

Grayson squirmed slightly. “As a matter of fact, it is.”

Ben glanced at his notes. “The stated reason for your expulsion was that you were, quote, ‘failing to follow generally accepted scientific techniques’ and ‘affirming scientific opinions that could not be verified or reproduced.’ ”

“I’m sure they said something like that. Nonetheless, my technique works, and they just can’t stand that.”

“But it’s true that you don’t follow generally accepted scientific techniques.”

“I disagree.”

“Then show me your documentation. Prove to me that this blue-light business works.”

“I don’t know what you want.”

“I want proof. Can you show me a picture of what you saw?”

“No. Photography doesn’t work under infrared light.”

“Did you ask an impartial third person to view the bite under the blue light?”

“No.”

“In fact, no one else has been able to see any of the things that you claim to see under the light, right?”

“I can’t speak for other people.”

“In the world of science, a new technique cannot be accepted until the procedure can be documented. Until the results can be reproduced by other researchers. Correct?”

“I can’t be blamed for the unwillingness of others to accept what is perfectly apparent to me. I know what I see.”

“The world is full of people who know what they saw. Like ghosts. Or UFOs. But that doesn’t prove they exist, does it?”

“Of course not.”

“My legal assistant sees angels. My sister sees auras, though mostly only when she’s had too much to drink.”

“Objection!” Granny barked. “This is ridiculous.”

“I agree,” Ben said, “but you’re the one who put the man on the stand. He might as well be using voodoo or alchemy to see those bite marks. Whatever it is he’s doing, it has nothing to do with science.”

“Mr. Kincaid,” the judge said, “I will not permit this ranting-”

“I’m not ranting,” Ben said, “I’m making a motion. I move that this witness’s entire testimony be struck and that the jury be instructed to disregard.”

Granny ran up to the bench. “On what grounds?”

“On grounds that this so-called scientific evidence doesn’t hold water.”

“All we have to do is show that it is based on generally accepted scientific principles,” Granny argued. “I think we’ve done that.”

“I agree,” Judge Pickens said.

“You’re both wrong,” Ben said. “That isn’t the test anymore. The Supreme Court ruled in Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals that it wasn’t enough. They held that forensic results must be validated scientifically. I’ve been spending the whole cross trying to find some scientific validity for what this voodoo doctor does, and I still haven’t found it.”

“That’s just your opinion,” Granny said. “He explained his scientific process.”

“I agree,” the judge said.

“If you’d read the case, you’d know that he’s required to prove that this testimony is based upon good grounds, and that his technique can be and has been tested, meaning peer review and publication. He should document his error rates and control techniques.”

Pickens looked down from the bench. “As a matter of fact, Kincaid, I have read the case, and I happen to know for a fact that the Court suggested those items as guidelines-not as a mandatory checklist. The ultimate decision is left to the discretion of the trial judge. And I find his testimony perfectly valid.”

“He admits himself he can’t show us any proof!”

“I’ve ruled,” Pickens said. “Your motion is denied. Either ask some more questions or sit down. Personally, I’d prefer the latter.”

Ben marched back to the podium. Pickens’s ruling was, of course, no big surprise. But he hoped the jury was getting the picture. Regardless of what the judge said, they were always free to disregard any evidence they didn’t find credible.

“Dr. Grayson, has anyone else endorsed or supported your findings?”

“Not as such. Although many scientists are experimenting with blue light.”

“But you’re the only one who runs around claiming to see things no one else can see with it?”

“I pioneered the technique, yes.”

“You’re a pioneer with no followers, right?”

Grayson sighed heavily. Was Ben finally managing to raise a few prickles on his tough hide? He hoped so. “I am confident that time and science will prove me right.”

“Well, the Woltz case sure didn’t, did it?”

Grayson looked up abruptly. His lips parted. “I-excuse me?”

“Three years ago, you testified in a prosecution for forcible rape against a man named Jackie Woltz, right?”

“That’s … correct.”

“That one didn’t turn out so well, did it?”

Grayson frowned. He seemed to be having more trouble choosing his words than he had before. “The prosecution was unsuccessful. The defendant was released.”

“There’s a bit more to it than that, isn’t there?” Ben peered down at the detailed court records Jones had sent him. “You identified Woltz as the rapist, based on yet another bite mark no one but you could see. Unfortunately for you, the hair and fingerprint evidence didn’t match Mr. Woltz. And the DNA analysis positively eliminated him as a suspect.”

Grayson drew up his chin. “I still stand by my findings.”

“You’re telling this jury that the fingerprints and DNA and hair-all the established forensic techniques-were wrong, but your totally undocumented technique was right?”

“I found that Mr. Woltz caused the bite wound. It’s possible that someone else committed the rape.”

“But that wasn’t your testimony. You took the stand and said Woltz must have been the rapist. Indeed, and beyond a doubt, right? Weren’t those your exact words?”