Hakan Nesser - The Return

He was only halfway there when it struck him that he

wasn’t alone in the darkness.

“What’s this thing for?” asked deBries, pointing at the tape recorder.

“It’s the chief inspector,” sighed Munster.

“What do you mean?”

“Well, he claims he’s leading the investigation and he doesn’t want to miss a word of this run-through. I tried to stop him, but you know what he’s like. . ”

“How is he?” asked Moreno.

“He’s on the mend, much better,” said Munster. “But he’ll have to stay in hospital for another three or four days at least.

According to the doctors, that is. I expect the nurses on the ward would throw him out today if it was up to them.”

“Oh dear,” said Rooth, scratching at his beard. “He ought to keep his thoughts to himself, is that it?”

“Probably,” said Munster, switching on the tape recorder.

“General update, Wednesday, May eleventh. Present: Munster, Rooth, deBries, Jung and Moreno. .”

There was a knock and Reinhart stuck his head round the door.

“Is there room for one more?”

“. . and Reinhart,” said Munster.

“What are you doing here?” asked Rooth. “Have all the racists gone away?”

Reinhart shook his head.

“I’m afraid not,” he said. “It’s just that I’m a bit interested in Leopold Verhaven. I’ve read a bit about him. So if you don’t mind. .?”

“No problem,” said deBries. “Sit next to the chief

inspector.”

“The chief inspector?” wondered Rooth.

“That’s him, whirring round and round.”

“I see,” said Reinhart, sitting down. “Absent but with us all the same.”

“Let’s start with the identification,” said Munster. “I’ll leave that to Rooth.”

Rooth cleared his throat.

“OK,” he said. “It’s all centered on the testicle business.

Verhaven had an accident when he was about ten. He cycled into a stone wall and got the handlebar between his legs.”

“Ouch,” said deBries.

“One testicle was injured and eventually had to be

removed. Meusse established that the body we found in the carpet was missing a testicle, and that fact together with all the other circumstances means that we can be pretty sure it’s him.

Verhaven, that is.”

“A circumstantial identification?” said Reinhart.

“You could call it that, yes,” said Rooth, “if you can get your tongue round it. His sister couldn’t say for sure if it was him-probably nobody could. But everything fits. All known factors point to him-being released from jail, witnesses in the village, traces in the house, the fact that nobody’s seen him since then. But, of course, there is a slight possibility that it could be somebody else. The question is who, and where Verhaven has disappeared to, in that case.”

There was silence for a few seconds.

“If Verhaven isn’t the victim,” said Jung, “presumably he must be the one who did it.”

Munster nodded.

“That has to be right,” he said. “But what are the odds of him finding some other poor bastard with only one testicle and then bumping him off? And why? No, I think we can forget that possibility. It’s Leopold Verhaven who’s dead, let’s agree on that. So somebody murdered him, on August twenty-fourth last year, the day he got back home after twelve years in prison. Or shortly after, in any case.”

“Were there any signs of violence in the house?” asked Reinhart.

“No,” said Rooth. “Nothing at all. We know nothing about how it was done, either. He could have been killed there, then taken somewhere else. The clothes he wore to come home in are still in the house. He could have changed, of course, but it looks as if he’d gone to bed.”

“The murderer could have arrived during the night

carrying a blunt instrument,” said Munster. “That’s pretty plausible.”

“Mind you, the neighbors on the other side of the woods didn’t see anything,” said Rooth. “There again, even Mrs.

Wilkerson must presumably be off guard occasionally.”

“Unless she and her husband take it in turns at the kitchen window,” said Munster. “That’s also plausible.”

“Motive,” said Munster, when everybody had served themselves from the coffee trolley. “That’s the big question mark, needless to say. As far as the technical evidence is concerned, we don’t even know what questions to ask. It might help if we found a few more body parts, but as things stand we have no alternative to a spot of speculation. So what do you think?

Rooth?”

Rooth quickly swallowed half a KitKat.

“I think we have to assume that somebody was waiting for him to be released,” he said. “Somebody who was in a hurry as well, and had a pretty good reason for doing it pretty damn quick.”

“Hmm,” said Reinhart. “What kind of reason might that be?”

“I don’t know,” said Rooth. “But let me develop this a bit further. There are two things that suggest it’s like I said. One is the obvious fact that Verhaven was murdered so quickly. The same day that he got home, presumably. The other is that somebody phoned the prison in Ulmentahl last winter and asked when he was going to be let out. Rang again in July to check. The sleepwalkers running the jail only unearthed those facts yesterday. When I went to talk to them some time ago, they didn’t even mention it.”

“The same person?” asked Reinhart.

“They’re not sure, and we can’t really expect them to be.

Still, it was a man both times. He claimed to be a journalist.”

Nobody spoke for a few seconds.

“And why should this man want to get Verhaven out of the way?” asked Moreno.

“Hmm,” said Rooth. “I’ve no idea. The most spectacular reason would be that it was something to do with the Beatrice and Marlene cases in some way. But that needn’t be the reason, of course.”

“Crap,” said Reinhart.

“What do you mean, crap?” asked Rooth indignantly,

scratching at his beard.

“It’s plain as a pikestaff that it’s to do with the other business,” said Reinhart. “The only question is, how?”

Munster looked at the officers assembled around the oval table. There was no doubt it would make a difference if Reinhart decided to join the investigation.

DeBries lit a cigarette.

“Can’t we press on a bit faster?” he said. “I mean, there are only two alternatives, as far as I can see. I thought we all agreed on that.”

“OK,” said Rooth. “Forgive my scientific scruples. Whoever killed Leopold Verhaven must have done it either because he couldn’t stand the man, hated him, wanted to punish him even more. Somebody who thought that twenty-four years weren’t long enough. The final solution, as it were. . Or somebody who had something to hide.”

“What?” asked Reinhart.

“Something that Verhaven knew about,” said Rooth, “and intended to do something about the moment he was released from prison. Or, at least, the murderer thought he was intending to do something about it.”

“What?” asked Reinhart again.

Rooth shrugged.

“We don’t know,” he said. “But in any case, it must have been pretty vital for the murderer that it didn’t come out.”

“If we assume that it was connected with the two earlier cases, there’s really only one possibility,” said Munster.

“You mean. .?” said Reinhart.

“Yes,” said Rooth. “We do. If all we’ve said is in fact true, it could well mean that Verhaven was not guilty of the murders he was sentenced and punished for. And that somehow he managed to find out who really did it. That’s what we mean.