William Brownlow - Americanism Contrasted with Foreignism, Romanism, and Bogus Democracy in the Light of Reason, History, and Scripture;

"Is there any non-intervention in the sixth resolution of the (new) Philadelphia platform? Is there any denial of the right of Congress to interfere with the subject of slavery in the sixth resolution of the (new) Philadelphia platform?"

And he answers, " Certainly not! " The ignorant man, it would seem, only read as far as to the sixth section of the new Platform; and even that section contains a direct affirmative answer to his question; which, in order to place the American party in a false position, he answers, " Certainly not! "

Now, we ask such as may have noticed his misrepresentations , to read a little further on , at least to the end of the 7th section of this new Platform, and see where it leaves Mr. Watkins! Turn back to the 7th section, and it will be seen that this section, instead of " pretermitting any opinion " on the question, announces the doctrine that the citizens of the United States permanently residing in the Territories, have a " right " to frame their Constitution and laws, and to regulate their domestic affairs in their own mode, subject only to the provisions of the Federal Constitution!

The New York Evening Post , a Pierce and foreign Democratic organ, thus alludes to the action of the Convention which nominated Fillmore and Donelson: —

"The 12th section of the June Platform, it is true, had been abrogated; BUT IT HAD BEEN REPLACED BY ANOTHER, MEANING PRECISELY THE SAME THING!"

The Cincinnati Gazette , an Abolition, Anti-American Foreign sheet, came out in opposition to the American nominees, in its issue of Feb. 29th, 1856, on account of the Pro-slavery character of the new Platform. The Gazette says: —

"We are glad that the action of the Convention proved so decided as to leave no doubt as to the character of the Platform . The latter is clearly and decidedly Pro-slavery and Nebraska, and in this respect corresponds precisely with the principles of the Pierce Democracy! Fillmore and Donelson are therefore presented to the American people as candidates for the Presidency and Vice Presidency, ON A THOROUGH AND DECIDED NEBRASKA PRO-SLAVERY PLATFORM, and the citizens of Northern States are asked to vote for them!"

The New York Tribune , whose editor was a prominent member of the Pittsburgh Black Republican Convention, and who is violent in his opposition to Fillmore and Donelson, says:

"The object of the Know Nothings has dwindled down to this – TO DEFEAT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY! That is to say, this is the object of those who have managed the Philadelphia Convention, and nominated Mr. Fillmore. I have diligently inquired for a member who voted for Banks for Speaker, and now supports Fillmore ; but up to this time – more than three days after the nomination – I have not heard of one. That sort must be scarce!"

The following is the official vote on the adoption of the new Platform by the National Council, which met four days previous to the Nominating Convention:

New Hampshire — Nays – Messrs. Colby and Emery.

Massachusetts — Yeas – Messrs. Ely, Weith, Brewster, Robinson, and Arnold. Nays – Messrs. Richmond, Wheelwright, Temple, Thurston, Sumner, Allen, Sawin, and Hawkes.

Connecticut — Nays – Messrs. Sperry, Dunbar, Peck, Booth, Holley, and Perkins.

Rhode Island — Yeas – Messrs. Chase and Knight. Nays – Messrs. Simons and Nightingale.

New York — Yeas – Messrs. Walker, Oakley, Morgan, Woodward, Reynolds, Chester, Owens, Sanders, Whiston, Nichols, Van Dusen, Westbrook, Parsons, Picket, Campbell, Lowell, Sammons, Oakes, Seymour, Squire, Cooper, Burr, Bennett, Marvine, Midler, Stephens, Johnson, Wetmore, Hammond, and S. Seymour. Nay – Mr. Barker.

Delaware — Yeas – Messrs. Clement and Smithers.

Maryland — Yeas – Messrs. Codet, Alexander, Winchester, Stephens, and Wilmot. Nays – Messrs. Purnell, Ricaud, Pinkney, and Kramer.

Virginia — Nays – Messrs. Bolling, McHugh, Cochran, Boteler, Preston, and Maupin.

Florida — Yea – Mr. Call.

New Jersey — Yeas – Messrs. Deshler, Weeks, Lyon, and McClellan.

Pennsylvania — Yeas – Messrs. Freeman, Nelclede, Gossler, Smith, Gillinham, Hammond, Wood, Gilford, Pyle, Farrand, and Williamson. Nays – Messrs. Johnson, Sewell, Jones, Parker, Heistand, Kase, Kinkaid, Coffee, Carlisle, Crovode, Edie, Sewell, and Power.

Louisiana — Yeas – Messrs. Lathrop and Elam. Nays – Messrs. Harman and Hardy.

California — Yeas – Messrs. Wood and Stanley.

Arkansas — Yea – Mr. Logan. Nay – Mr. Fowler.

Tennessee — Yeas – Messrs. Brownlow, Bankhead, Zollicoffer, Burton, Campbell, Donelson, Harris, Bilbo, and Beloat. Nays – Messrs. Nelson, Reedy, and Picket.

Kentucky — Yeas – Messrs. Stowers, Campbell, Raphael, Todd, Clay, Goodloe, and Bartlett. Nays – Messrs. Shanklin, Jones, Carpenter, Gist, and Underwood.

Ohio — Yeas – Messrs. White, Nash, Simpson, and Lippett. Nays – Messrs. Gabriel, Olds, Ford, Barker, Potter, Stanbaugh, Rodgers, Spooner, Hodges, Kyle, Lees, Swigart, Allison, Fishback, Thomas, Corwine, Chapman, Ayres, and Johnson.

Indiana — Yeas – Messrs. Sheets and Phelps. Nay – Mr. Meredith.

Missouri — Yeas – Messrs. Edward, Fletcher, and Hockaday. Nay – Mr. Breckenridge.

Michigan — Yea – Mr. Wood.

Wisconsin — Yeas – Messrs. Lockwood, Cook, Chandler, and Gillies.

District of Columbia — Yeas – Messrs. Ellis and Evans.

Illinois — Yeas – Messrs. Danenhower and Allen. Nays – Messrs. Jennings and Gear.

Iowa — Nays – Messrs. Webster and Thorrington.

Yeas – 108. Nays – 77.

We will close this chapter by giving the delegates who seceded from the Nominating Convention, with the Address published by them on the occasion. That recession was a more inconsiderable affair than has been represented by the foreign party of this country. The author of this work was the Chairman of the large Committee on Credentials, and reported two hundred and seventy-seven delegates, which report was received without opposition, as to numbers. Of these, forty-two only seceded, viz.: 13 out of 28 from Ohio; one of two from New Hampshire; 6 – all – from Connecticut; 2 out of 13 from Massachusetts; one out of 3 from Illinois; 7 out of 27 from Pennsylvania; one out of 4 from Rhode Island; 5 – all – from Michigan; 5 – all – from Wisconsin; one – all – from Iowa; 42 out of 277 – not a sixth , and but little over a seventh of the whole!

The seceders or "bolters" made the following address, to which they appended their States and names. What they say of the Louisiana delegates, we have explained in another portion of this work:

"The undersigned, delegates to the nominating Convention now in session at Philadelphia, find themselves compelled to dissent from the principles avowed by that body; and holding opinions, as they do, that the restoration of the Missouri Compromise, as demanded by a majority of the whole people, is a redress of an undeniable wrong, and the execution of it, in spirit at least, indispensable to the repose of the country, they have regarded the refusal of that Convention to recognize the well-defined opinion of the country, and of the Americans of the free States, upon this question, as a denial of their rights and a rebuke to their sentiments; and they hold that the admission into the National Council and nominating Convention, of delegates from Louisiana, representing a Roman Catholic Constituency, absolved every true American from all obligations to sustain the action of either of the said bodies.