Stanley Elkin - A Bad Man
Здесь есть возможность читать онлайн «Stanley Elkin - A Bad Man» весь текст электронной книги совершенно бесплатно (целиком полную версию без сокращений). В некоторых случаях можно слушать аудио, скачать через торрент в формате fb2 и присутствует краткое содержание. Год выпуска: 2010, Издательство: Open Road Integrated Media LLC, Жанр: Современная проза, на английском языке. Описание произведения, (предисловие) а так же отзывы посетителей доступны на портале библиотеки ЛибКат.
- Название:A Bad Man
- Автор:
- Издательство:Open Road Integrated Media LLC
- Жанр:
- Год:2010
- ISBN:нет данных
- Рейтинг книги:5 / 5. Голосов: 1
-
Избранное:Добавить в избранное
- Отзывы:
-
Ваша оценка:
- 100
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
A Bad Man: краткое содержание, описание и аннотация
Предлагаем к чтению аннотацию, описание, краткое содержание или предисловие (зависит от того, что написал сам автор книги «A Bad Man»). Если вы не нашли необходимую информацию о книге — напишите в комментариях, мы постараемся отыскать её.
A Bad Man — читать онлайн бесплатно полную книгу (весь текст) целиком
Ниже представлен текст книги, разбитый по страницам. Система сохранения места последней прочитанной страницы, позволяет с удобством читать онлайн бесплатно книгу «A Bad Man», без необходимости каждый раз заново искать на чём Вы остановились. Поставьте закладку, и сможете в любой момент перейти на страницу, на которой закончили чтение.
Интервал:
Закладка:
Feldman stretched out on his cot.
“Sick?” Lurie asked him.
“Yes.”
“Go on sick call?”
“I’m taking care of it myself.”
“That’s it,” Lurie said. “Stay away from these sawbones. A man with your history. They wouldn’t be allowed to patch a tire on the outside. I haven’t gone on sick call since Brunner left. He was terrific. He really knew medicine. He was a genius.”
Feldman had wearied of the man’s incredible loyalties, his fierce spites. This was prison, he thought. In his office there were a million ways to defend against bores. He could make a telephone call, go to lunch early, plan a trip, have an appointment, get off a letter. There were things to do with his hands. He remembered filling his water carafe, taking a cigar from a humidor that played “Smoke Gets in Your Eyes,” lighting it with a lighter shaped like a cash register (you punched No Sale), adjusting the Venetian blinds, slanting the sun in a visitor’s eyes. Or the toys — the absurd executive toys: the gold Yo-Yo’s on silken strings, the pointless machines with visible moving parts, the kaleidoscopic paperweights, the office golf (he only played golf in the office), the tiny TV set on which he caught the noon news. There were conferences, committee work (he was a downtown merchant, public-spirited, the inventor of the Free Friday Bus Ride and the Shopper’s Nursery Service in the public park). And there was his basement. But here he could not even pull down a shade or open the window. He lived in a cage, bored as a beast.
Lurie was still talking. Feldman had a thought, a wish so clear and incisive it could almost have been an idea. He wanted Lurie to die. He wished desperately that this bore might be suddenly seized with something angry and irrevocable, that he would disintegrate! But he had thick forearms and hadn’t gone on sick call since Brunner. A collapse was unlikely, but Feldman knew that if he had a gun and the opportunity to get away with it, he would kill Lurie. It didn’t surprise him. It was the system which shaped these thoughts. It did not provide for the splendid half and quarter measures of freedom — executive toys and committees and the heft of a paperweight in the palm of your hand and the rest.
Suddenly Feldman stood up and dropped his trousers and went to the toilet between the two cots. He squatted on it and strained and stared at Lurie. The man continued to rub the bars. Feldman might have been doing nothing more private or offensive than biting his nails. I don’t know, he thought, this would have cleared them out back at the office. He sat hopelessly, beginning, despite himself, to nod as Lurie talked.
“Cancer,” Lurie was saying, “the big one. That’s what they finally diagnosed. After all that time. So he’s finally lying there — my cellmate — in the infirmary. They ain’t doing nothing to clean it out of him. Too late, they told him. What do these guys care? You know something? This is a guy that always worried about himself. He kept up. He used to drive me nuts with his grousing. You know those seven danger signals they’re always talking about? My friend had a match cover that listed them, and he had four out of the seven. Four out of the seven danger signals, when only one’s enough. He went to the infirmary each time he’d get a new danger signal, but they didn’t know it was cancer until his third danger signal. That’s the kind of doctor they got over there in that infirmary. He’s laying there now. Last week a guy on infirmary crew fucked up and got thrown in solitary, and Dean fixed it so I could clean my friend’s room. It tore me up. He was a strong guy, my friend. He’s nothing now. He told me he’s up to six of the seven danger signals. He laughed about it.”
Feldman flushed the toilet.
“Listen,” Lurie said, “if you’re sick you probably don’t feel like getting the bars over your window. You can do it later, or — I’ll tell you what — I’ll come back sometime when your cell is open and do it for you myself.”
Suddenly, irrationally, Feldman was moved. “Thank you,” he said. He wanted to cry. I’m crazy, he thought. They’ve driven me crazy.
“No, it’s nothing,” Lurie said. “You can see yourself what a difference it makes.”
“It’s very nice,” Feldman said. “I’ve got the shiniest bars in my cellblock.”
“It makes a difference.”
“It certainly does.”
“I enjoyed talking to you,” Lurie said.”
“I enjoyed talking to you .”
“It’s a terrible thing to say, but it makes the day go faster when I run into a sick con.”
Feldman nodded.
“This ain’t fun,” Lurie said.
“No,” Feldman said.
“Scrubbing’s no deal.”
“No,” Feldman said, “I guess not.”
“Even when you got a crew chief like Dean.”
The man folded his rag and pushed it up the sleeve of his sweat suit, where it lay on the thick ridge of muscle along his big forearms like the handkerchief of a gentlewoman. “Everybody’s got troubles,” he said.
Feldman decided to eat his lunch with the men.
Tables with large black numbers painted on their tops were assigned them, and twice each month everyone was given a new number corresponding to one of the tables. They had to carry this number with them and show it to the dining-hall official if he asked to see it. The men had their special friends, of course, and sometimes moved beside them regardless of their assigned numbers. It was a major offense if they could not justify their seating, but they often took the risk. The dining-hall official moved arbitrarily among the tables, spot-checking.
Feldman, studying the men as they took their trays and moved silently to seats, could tell, just as surely as the dining-hall official, from the gestures and nudges and shufflings, which men were falsifying their assignments. It was queer how men properly assigned to a place noiselessly submitted to those who would force them in turn to seek false positions. To break silence if one was being pushed away from one’s proper place was permitted, of course, but such an action was considered a betrayal by the men and was severely punished by them. And since to scuffle openly in the dining hall was an even more serious offense than either sitting at an unassigned table or breaking silence, the displaced and expelled stalked nervously under the eyes of the official toward some hopefully unassigned space. (There were several such spaces: “free spaces” deliberately kept open by the warden; the unoccupied seats of the sick, of men on special-duty rosters, of men brooding in their cells.) Usually, so suspicious did they look, an official did not spot-check in vain, although the man caught was more frequently the moved than the mover. The official, silent himself, would tap a man on the left shoulder, and all the men at the table, so no con at the right table could slip his number to an interloper, had to place face up in a vacant corner of their trays the laminated plastic numbers they were forced to carry.
Occasionally there was an attempt to divert an official. Taking circuitous routes among the tables, prisoners might deliberately try to seem suspicious so as to make a fool of a guard, or to serve some friend actually counterfeiting a table assignment as a decoy. The men did not seem to understand that they were serving the warden’s ends and not their own when they played these jokes, by bringing astute and astuter officials into the dining hall. The beauty of the warden’s system did not escape Feldman, however. Like many other rules in the prison it seemed unbeatable, and provided the warden with still another means of testing the convicts. (“It accomplishes several things,” the warden later told Feldman. “For one, it exposes the queers. It gives me an insight into who might be planning an escape. It speeds up meals. It saves the state money. The men grab their trays and move on to their seats rapidly so as not to be shouldered out of the way. They take less food on their trays.”) They might have tried to trade numbers , Feldman thought, but they were a disorganized bunch, and this never seemed to occur to them. They relied instead on risk and change. Yet Feldman was aware of the astonishing fact that it was love — the conspirators, the escape-planners, could always meet in holes and corners; the rules, if they had to contend only with the plotters, would have forced them to plot elsewhere — which made the system work, that there would always be those who would take the risks.
Читать дальшеИнтервал:
Закладка:
Похожие книги на «A Bad Man»
Представляем Вашему вниманию похожие книги на «A Bad Man» списком для выбора. Мы отобрали схожую по названию и смыслу литературу в надежде предоставить читателям больше вариантов отыскать новые, интересные, ещё непрочитанные произведения.
Обсуждение, отзывы о книге «A Bad Man» и просто собственные мнения читателей. Оставьте ваши комментарии, напишите, что Вы думаете о произведении, его смысле или главных героях. Укажите что конкретно понравилось, а что нет, и почему Вы так считаете.