Robert Coover - Public Burning

Здесь есть возможность читать онлайн «Robert Coover - Public Burning» весь текст электронной книги совершенно бесплатно (целиком полную версию без сокращений). В некоторых случаях можно слушать аудио, скачать через торрент в формате fb2 и присутствует краткое содержание. Год выпуска: 1976, ISBN: 1976, Издательство: Dzanc Books, Жанр: Современная проза, на английском языке. Описание произведения, (предисловие) а так же отзывы посетителей доступны на портале библиотеки ЛибКат.

Public Burning: краткое содержание, описание и аннотация

Предлагаем к чтению аннотацию, описание, краткое содержание или предисловие (зависит от того, что написал сам автор книги «Public Burning»). Если вы не нашли необходимую информацию о книге — напишите в комментариях, мы постараемся отыскать её.

A controversial best-seller in 1977, The Public Burning has since emerged as one of the most influential novels of our time. The first major work of contemporary fiction ever to use living historical figures as characters, the novel reimagines the three fateful days in 1953 that culminated with the execution of alleged atomic spies Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. Vice-President Richard Nixon — the voraciously ambitious bad boy of the Eisenhower regime — is the dominant narrator in an enormous cast that includes Betty Crocker, Joe McCarthy, the Marx Brothers, Walter Winchell, Uncle Sam, his adversary The Phantom, and Time magazine incarnated as the National Poet Laureate. All of these and thousands more converge in Times Square for the carnivalesque auto-da-fe at which the Rosenbergs are put to death. And not a person present escapes implication in Cold War America's ruthless "public burning."

Public Burning — читать онлайн бесплатно полную книгу (весь текст) целиком

Ниже представлен текст книги, разбитый по страницам. Система сохранения места последней прочитанной страницы, позволяет с удобством читать онлайн бесплатно книгу «Public Burning», без необходимости каждый раз заново искать на чём Вы остановились. Поставьте закладку, и сможете в любой момент перейти на страницу, на которой закончили чтение.

Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

DEFENSE: Say, by the way, this fella “John,” you know, your Russian contact — an older fella. I gather, tall and sort of blond…

GOLD: No, he was about five feet nine inches in height, had a medium build, which tended toward the slender, and he was about twenty-eight or thirty years old…

DEFENSE: I see. But blond and—

GOLD: No, he had dark or dark brown hair and there was a lock of it that kept falling over his forehead, which he would brush back continually…

DEFENSE: Tried to keep it stuffed under his cap, I suppose…

GOLD: Yes, and he had a rather long nose and fair complexion, dark eyes. He walked with somewhat of a stoop…

DEFENSE: Like a catcher, you mean. Or a rightfielder…

GOLD: NO, first base was his position actually…

DEFENSE: Not too tall, but agile…

GOLD: Yes, he had a good reach, and…uh…ah…

DEFENSE: I see. Tell me, Harry, what…uh, what team did John play for?

GOLD: ( A slight twitch in the left side of his face. His fingers flutter as though shuffling cards, as his eyes glance to and fro uneasily , DEFENSE smiles at the PROSECUTOR.)

Like taking candy from a baby. Which makes one wonder why Gold caused Bloch such distress. He seemed very eager not to hear more. It may have been simply that Rosenberg didn’t want anyone else to get implicated, and just couldn’t trust a fabulator like Gold. Gold had said little so far that touched Julius, had admitted he didn’t know him at all, but if you kept him talking, who knew what friends or relatives might get dragged in? And maybe Julius knew damned well who Gold was and what he might say. According to Edgar’s secret files, Gold, under prompting, had begun to “remember” passing Julius on a street corner in Jackson Heights during an aborted “contact” with an unknown agent back in 1950, Julius suited up in the style of his newspaper photos, scowling and wallowing a cigar like Groucho Marx. A preposterous tale, but who could say? More than once what looked like a complete Gold fantasy had resulted in arrests and confessions, almost as though he were dreaming the world into being. Maybe he was the real playwright here. And maybe the Rosenbergs quite reasonably feared some irrevocable casting. Whatever, the net effect was terribly damaging to them.

Most of Bloch’s blunders, in fact, implied that he was running scared, that a wrong move could sink them all — implied in short that the Rosenbergs were indeed guilty. As no doubt they were. You only had to look at them. Like Uncle Sam said: They reeked with guilt. Their arrogance, their clumsy lying, their hiding behind the Fifth Amendment, those obvious Communist links they wouldn’t admit to, their obsequiousness, their phony complaints about bad health, their frequent failure to “recall” simple facts, all the political grandstanding — from considerable experience in observing witnesses on the stand, I had learned that those who are lying or trying to cover up something generally make a common mistake— they tend to overact, to overstate their case . Even the way they took the Fifth was different from the way an innocent man might take it on principle. Like Alger Hiss, they’d hung themselves with their transparent deceitfulness, their pompous denials, their pretensions of injured innocence.

Part of what seemed to give the lie to their testimony, of course, was the phony role they’d cast themselves in: the ordinary middle-class American couple, romantic and hardworking, loving parents, being framed by a deceitful and unnatural brother, backed by a monstrous State bureaucracy, victimized by some ghastly error. Julius wore a business suit. He carefully obeyed every rule. He had never broken a law, though he’d once been fired from an Army job as a suspected Red. Ethel pursed her lips and wore a cloth coat like Pat. Their children had neat haircuts and scrubbed faces. Julius kept his chin up. Ethel smiled at the witnesses. They said they loved their mixed-up brother. They were shocked at Saypol’s indecorous puns. They held hands and kissed each other through wire mesh. “All our lives,” wrote Ethel for international publication, “we lived decent, constructive lives…” They had probably moved automatically, even gratefully, into these middle-class clichés after their arrests — I understood well the solace and protection you could find in them — but they wore them awkwardly. Julius moved like a whey-faced automaton in his stiff blue suit. The jurors called Ethel’s courtroom composure “steely” and “stony.” They had the wrong kind of friends, which didn’t help, noisy old left-wingers from college days whom they’d stayed loyal to — they just couldn’t play the bourgeois act straight, knowing those friends would be tuning in, watching for betrayals, contemptuous of anything less than heroics. Every time Julius said “sir,” you suspected him of satire. They were very impressive in their open willingness to put themselves in the witness box and in their bold denial of all charges, but their taking of the Fifth on ideological questions undid all that and suggested continuing Party orthodoxy, while deep in their voices like an indelible stain ran irrepressible un-American accents, the sour babble of steerage passengers and backpack peddlers, scarcely concealed, the pedantic precision of bright children whose parents don’t speak proper English. The electorate, needless to say, were not fooled.

But then who were the real Rosenbergs behind their role-playing? Probably never know. FBI reports had hinted at a taste for pornography and histrionics. Their apartment was cluttered with cheap junk, and they hung out with friends who lived pretty unconventional lives. People Pat and I wouldn’t even know how to talk to. They seemed to live without any structure, without any roots, yet they never went anywhere. I’d grown up across the river from the Mexican ghetto of Jim Town, so I knew what one looked like, but I couldn’t imagine living in a ghetto. I couldn’t understand why people didn’t just move out and go somewhere else. Lack of imagination or something. Terrible life there, they both got pushed around a lot. Ethel, just sixteen, had gone to apply for a job and had got knocked down by police fire hoses. Her ghetto past had haunted her, frustrated her theatrical career, just as I’d been frustrated in my hopes for a New York City law career by my small-town California past, only I didn’t let it embitter me. Julie had taken a lot of punishment, too, and seen worse. He’d become a left-winger in college, but ghetto Jews were supposed to be left-wingers at a time when most right-wingers were Jew-baiters, so in a way he was being just as conventional as I was back at Whittier College. He’d seen young Bundist toughs beating up bearded old Jews playing chess in Seward Park, Negroes shot in race killings. He’d got stopped one night near Union Square by two brownshirts who’d asked him what CCNY meant. “City College of New York,” he’d told them. “Naw!” they’d laughed, shoving him off the sidewalk: “It means Christian College Now Yiddish!” And then, one thing had led to another. They’d stayed loyal to the left-wing friends who’d admired them — their constituency, as it were — and the next thing they’d known, there was a war on, the Communists were amazingly our allies, Julius was working for the Army and Ethel had a brother out on the A-bomb project, other engineering friends were similarly dispersed — so suppose the request came through: how could they say no? Get out of the overt activities of college days and withdraw to the very center of the heresy that excited them: why not? After all, I’d become Vice President of the United States of America by a chain of circumstances not all that different, one thing drifting into the next, carried along by a desire, much like theirs, to reach the heart of things, to participate deeply in life.

Читать дальше
Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

Похожие книги на «Public Burning»

Представляем Вашему вниманию похожие книги на «Public Burning» списком для выбора. Мы отобрали схожую по названию и смыслу литературу в надежде предоставить читателям больше вариантов отыскать новые, интересные, ещё непрочитанные произведения.


Отзывы о книге «Public Burning»

Обсуждение, отзывы о книге «Public Burning» и просто собственные мнения читателей. Оставьте ваши комментарии, напишите, что Вы думаете о произведении, его смысле или главных героях. Укажите что конкретно понравилось, а что нет, и почему Вы так считаете.

x