Theodore Dwight Weld - American Slavery as It is - Testimonies

Theodore Dwight Weld

Published by

Books

- Advanced Digital Solutions & High-Quality eBook Formatting -

musaicumbooks@okpublishing.info

2019 OK Publishing

EAN 4057664559104

Introduction

Personal Narratives

Narrative of Nehemiah Caulkins

Narrative of Rev. Horace Moulton

Narrative of Sarah M. Grimke

Testimony of Rev. John Graham

Testimony of William Poe

Privations of the Slaves

Food

Labor

Clothing

Dwellings

Treatment of the Sick

Personal Narratives, Part II.

Testimony of the Rev. William T. Allan

Narrative of William Leftwich

Testimony of Lemuel Sapington

Testimony of Mrs. Lowry

Testimony of William C. Gildersleeve

Testimony of Hiram White

Testimony of John M. Nelson

Testimony of Angelina Grimke Weld

Testimony of Cruelty Inflicted Upon Slaves

Punishments

Slave Driving

Cruelty to Slaves

Tortures of Slaves

Personal Narratives, Part III.

Narrative of Rev. Francis Hawley

Testimony of Reuben C. Macy, and Richard Macy

Testimony of Rev. William Scales

Testimony of Jos. Ide

Testimony of Rev. Phineas Smith

Testimony of Phil'n Bliss

Testimony of Rev. Wm. A. Chapin

Testimony of T. M. Macy

Testimony of F. C. Macy

Testimony of a Clergyman

Objections Considered

Objection I.--"Such Cruelties are Incredible."

Objection II.--"Slaveholders Protest That They Treat Their Slaves Well."

Objection III.--"Slaveholders Are Proverbial for Their Kindness, and Generosity

Objection IV.--"Northern Visitors at the South Testify That the Slaves Are Not Cruelly Treated"

Objection V.--"It is for the Interest of the Masters to Treat Their Slaves Well."

Objection VI.--"Slaves Multiply; a Proof That They Are Not Inhumanly Treated, and Are in a Comfortable Condition"

Objection VII.--"Public Opinion is a Protection to the Slave"

Table of Contents

Reader, you are empannelled as a juror to try a plain case and bring in an honest verdict. The question at issue is not one of law, but of fact--"What is the actual condition of the slaves in the United States?" A plainer case never went to a jury. Look at it. TWENTY-SEVEN HUNDRED THOUSAND PERSONS in this country, men, women, and children, are in SLAVERY. Is slavery, as a condition for human beings, good, bad, or indifferent? We submit the question without argument. You have common sense, and conscience, and a human heart;--pronounce upon it. You have a wife, or a husband, a child, a father, a mother, a brother or a sister--make the case your own, make it theirs, and bring in your verdict. The case of Human Rights against Slavery has been adjudicated in the court of conscience times innumerable. The same verdict has always been rendered--"Guilty;" the same sentence has always been pronounced, "Let it be accursed;" and human nature, with her million echoes, has rung it round the world in every language under heaven, "Let it be accursed. Let it be accursed." His heart is false to human nature, who will not say "Amen." There is not a man on earth who does not believe that slavery is a curse. Human beings may be inconsistent, but human nature is true to herself. She has uttered her testimony against slavery with a shriek ever since the monster was begotten; and till it perishes amidst the execrations of the universe, she will traverse the world on its track, dealing her bolts upon its head, and dashing against it her condemning brand. We repeat it, every man knows that slavery is a curse. Whoever denies this, his lips libel his heart. Try him; clank the chains in his ears, and tell him they are for him; give him an hour to prepare his wife and children for a life of slavery; bid him make haste and get ready their necks for the yoke, and their wrists for the coffle chains, then look at his pale lips and trembling knees, and you have nature's testimony against slavery.

Two millions seven hundred thousand persons in these States are in this condition. They were made slaves and are held such by force, and by being put in fear, and this for no crime! Reader, what have you to say of such treatment? Is it right, just, benevolent? Suppose I should seize you, rob you of your liberty, drive you into the field, and make you work without pay as long as you live, would that be justice and kindness, or monstrous injustice and cruelty? Now, every body knows that the slaveholders do these things to the slaves every day, and yet it is stoutly affirmed that they treat them well and kindly, and that their tender regard for their slaves restrains the masters from inflicting cruelties upon them. We shall go into no metaphysics to show the absurdity of this pretence. The man who robs you every day, is, forsooth, quite too tender-hearted ever to cuff or kick you! True, he can snatch your money, but he does it gently lest he should hurt you. He can empty your pockets without qualms, but if your stomach is empty, it cuts him to the quick. He can make you work a life time without pay, but loves you too well to let you go hungry. He fleeces you of your rights with a relish, but is shocked if you work bareheaded in summer, or in winter without warm stockings. He can make you go without your liberty, but never without a shirt. He can crush, in you, all hope of bettering your condition, by vowing that you shall die his slave, but though he can coolly torture your feelings, he is too compassionate to lacerate your back--he can break your heart, but he is very tender of your skin. He can strip you of all protection and thus expose you to all outrages, but if you are exposed to the weather, half clad and half sheltered, how yearn his tender bowels! What! slaveholders talk of treating men well, and yet not only rob them of all they get, and as fast as they get it, but rob them of themselves, also; their very hands and feet, all their muscles, and limbs, and senses, their bodies and minds, their time and liberty and earnings, their free speech and rights of conscience, their right to acquire knowledge, and property, and reputation;--and yet they, who plunder them of all these, would fain make us believe that their soft hearts ooze out so lovingly toward their slaves that they always keep them well housed and well clad, never push them too hard in the field, never make their dear backs smart, nor let their dear stomachs get empty.

But there is no end to these absurdities. Are slaveholders dunces, or do they take all the rest of the world to be, that they think to bandage our eyes with such thin gauzes? Protesting their kind regard for those whom they hourly plunder of all they have and all they get! What! when they have seized their victims, and annihilated all their rights, still claim to be the special guardians of their happiness! Plunderers of their liberty, yet the careful suppliers of their wants? Robbers of their earnings, yet watchful sentinels round their interests, and kind providers for their comfort? Filching all their time, yet granting generous donations for rest and sleep? Stealing the use of their muscles, yet thoughtful of their ease? Putting them under drivers, yet careful that they are not hard-pushed? Too humane forsooth to stint the stomachs of their slaves, yet force their minds to starve, and brandish over them pains and penalties, if they dare to reach forth for the smallest crumb of knowledge, even a letter of the alphabet!