Bioethics

Здесь есть возможность читать онлайн «Bioethics» — ознакомительный отрывок электронной книги совершенно бесплатно, а после прочтения отрывка купить полную версию. В некоторых случаях можно слушать аудио, скачать через торрент в формате fb2 и присутствует краткое содержание. Жанр: unrecognised, на английском языке. Описание произведения, (предисловие) а так же отзывы посетителей доступны на портале библиотеки ЛибКат.

Bioethics: краткое содержание, описание и аннотация

Предлагаем к чтению аннотацию, описание, краткое содержание или предисловие (зависит от того, что написал сам автор книги «Bioethics»). Если вы не нашли необходимую информацию о книге — напишите в комментариях, мы постараемся отыскать её.

The new edition of the classic collection of key readings in bioethics, fully updated to reflect the latest developments and main issues in the field
 
For more than two decades,
has been widely regarded as the definitive single-volume compendium of seminal readings on both traditional and cutting-edge ethical issues in biology and medicine. Acclaimed for its scope and depth of coverage, this landmark work brings together compelling writings by internationally-renowned bioethicist to help readers develop a thorough understanding of the central ideas, critical issues, and current debate in the field.
Now fully revised and updated, the fourth edition contains a wealth of new content on ethical questions and controversies related to the COVID-19 pandemic, advances in CRISPR gene editing technology, physician-assisted death, public health and vaccinations, transgender children, medical aid in dying, the morality of ending the lives of newborns, and much more. Throughout the new edition, carefully selected essays explore a wide range of topics and offer diverse perspectives that underscore the interdisciplinary nature of bioethical study. Edited by two of the field’s most respected scholars,  Covers an unparalleled range of thematically-organized topics in a single volume Discusses recent high-profile cases, debates, and ethical issues Features three brand-new sections: Conscientious Objection, Academic Freedom and Research, and Disability Contains new essays on topics such as brain death, life and death decisions for the critically ill, experiments on humans and animals, neuroethics, and the use of drugs to ease the pain of unrequited love Includes a detailed index that allows the reader to easily find terms and topics of interest
 remains a must-have resource for all students, lecturers, and researchers studying the ethical implications of the health-related life sciences, and an invaluable reference for doctors, nurses, and other professionals working in health care and the biomedical sciences.

Bioethics — читать онлайн ознакомительный отрывок

Ниже представлен текст книги, разбитый по страницам. Система сохранения места последней прочитанной страницы, позволяет с удобством читать онлайн бесплатно книгу «Bioethics», без необходимости каждый раз заново искать на чём Вы остановились. Поставьте закладку, и сможете в любой момент перейти на страницу, на которой закончили чтение.

Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

44 William Rooney, Udo Schüklenk, and Suzanne van de Vathorst, “Are Concerns about Irremediableness, Vulnerability, or Competence Sufficient to Exclude All Psychiatric Patients from Medical Aid in Dying?” pp. 326–343 from Health Care Analysis 26 (2018). Reproduced with permission of Springer Nature.

45 Peter Singer and Lucy Winkett, “The Duel: Is It More Important to Save Younger Lives?, Prospect, May 4, 2020. Reproduced courtesy of the authors and Prospect magazine.

46 John Harris, “The Value of Life,” pp. 87–102 from The Value of Life (London: Routledge, 1985). © 1985 Routledge. Reproduced with permission of Taylor & Francis Books UK.

47 Nick Beckstead and Toby Ord, “Bubbles under the Wallpaper: Healthcare Rationing and Discrimination,” a paper presented to the conference “Valuing Lives” New York University, March 5, 2011, © Nick Beckstead and Toby Ord, reproduced with permission of the authors. The chapter draws on Nick Beckstead and Toby Ord, “Rationing and Rationality: The Cost of Avoiding Discrimination,” pp. 232−239 from N. Eyal et al. (eds.), Inequalities in Health: Concepts, Measures, and Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013). Reproduced with permission of Oxford University Press.

48 Paul T. Menzel, “Rescuing Lives: Can’t We Count?” pp. 22–23 from Hastings Center Report 24: 1 (1994). Reproduced with permission of John Wiley & Sons.

49 Alvin H. Moss and Mark Siegler, “Should Alcoholics Compete Equally for Liver Transplantation?” pp. 1295–1298 from Journal of the American Medical Association 265: 10 (1991). © 1991 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

50 Eike‐Henner W. Kluge, “Organ Donation and Retrieval: Whose Body Is It Anyway?” © 1999 Eike‐Henner W. Kluge.

51 Janet Radcliffe‐Richards et al., “The Case for Allowing Kidney Sales,” pp. 1950–1952 from The Lancet 351: 9120 (June 27, 1998). Reproduced with permission of Elsevier.

52 Debra Satz, “Ethical Issues in the Supply and Demand of Human Kidneys,” pp. 189–206 from Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010). based on an article from Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 2 (2010). Reproduced with permission of Oxford University Press and the Aristotelian Society.

53 John Harris, “The Survival Lottery,” pp. 81–87 from Philosophy 50 (1975). © 1975 Royal Institute of Philosophy. Reproduced with permission of Cambridge University Press.

54 National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, “The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research,” 1978, pp. 1–20. Public domain.

55 John Harris, “Scientific Research Is a Moral Duty,” pp. 242–248 from Journal of Medical Ethics 31: 4 (2005). Reproduced with permission of BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

56 Sandra Shapshay and Kenneth D. Pimple, “Participation in Research Is an Imperfect Moral Duty: A Response to John Harris,” pp. 414–417 from Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (2007). Reproduced with permission of BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

57 Peter Lurie and Sidney M. Wolfe, “Unethical Trials of Interventions to Reduce Perinatal Transmission of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Developing Countries,” pp. 853–856 from New England Journal of Medicine 337: 12 (September 1997). © 1997 Massachusetts Medical Society. Reproduced with permission of Massachusetts Medical Society.

58 Danstan Bageda and Philippa Musoke‐Mudido, “We’re Trying to Help Our Sickest People, Not Exploit Them,” from The Washington Post, September 28, 1997. © 1997 Washington Post Company. All rights reserved.

59 Richard Yetter Chappell and Peter Singer, “Pandemic Ethics: The Case for Risky Research,” pp. 1–8 from Research Ethics 16: 3–4 (2020). Reproduced with permission of Sage Publications Ltd.

60 Immanuel Kant, “Duties towards Animals,” pp. 239–241 from Lectures on Ethics, trans. Louis Infield (London: Methuen, 1930).

61 Jeremy Bentham, “A Utilitarian View,” section XVIII, IV from An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, First published c. 1820. Public domain.

62 Nathan Nobis, “Harmful, Nontherapeutic Use of Animals in Research is Morally Wrong,” pp. 297−304 from American Journal of the Medical Sciences 342: 4 (October 2011). Reproduced with permission of Elsevier.

63 Dario L. Ringach, “Use of Nonhuman Animals in Biomedical Research,” pp. 305–313 from American Journal of the Medical Sciences 342: 4 (October 2011). Reproduced with permission of Elsevier.

64 Carolyn P. Neuhaus, “Ethical Issues When Modelling Brain Disorders in Non‐Human Primates,” pp. 323–327 from Journal of Medical Ethics 44. Reproduced with permission of BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

65 John Stuart Mill, “Of the Liberty of Thought and Discussion” (extract) from On Liberty, chapter II. First published 1859. Public domain.

66 Janet A. Kourany, “Should Some Knowledge be Forbidden: The Case of Cognitive Differences Research,” pp. 779–790 from Philosophy of Science 83 (December 2016). Reproduced with permission of University of Chicago Press.

67 James R. Flynn, “Academic Freedom and Race: You Ought Not to Believe What You Think May Be True,” pp. 127–131 from Journal of Criminal Justice 59 (2018). Reproduced with permission of Elsevier.

68 Michael J. Selgelid, “Ethics and Infectious Disease,” pp. 272–289 from Bioethics 19: 3 (2005). Reproduced with permission of John Wiley & Sons.

69 Jerome Amir Singh, Ross Upshur, and Nesri Padayatchi, “XDR‐TB in South Africa: No Time for Denial or Complacency,” PLoS Medicine 4: 1 (2007): e50. © 2007 Singh et al. Open access / CC BY 4.0.

70 Excerpted from Vijayaprasad Gopichandran, “Clinical Ethics During the Covid‐19 Pandemic: Missing the Trees for the Forest,” pp. 1–5 from Indian Journal of Medical Ethics 5: 3 (2020).

71 Alberto Giubilini, Thomas Douglas, and Julian Savulescu, “The Moral Obligation to be Vaccinated: Utilitarianism, Contractualism and Collective Easy Rescue,” pp. 547–560 from Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21 (2018). © 2018 Alberto Giubilini, Thomas Douglas, and Julian Savulescu. Springer Nature /Open access.

72 Neil Levy, “Taking Responsibility for Responsibility,” pp. 108–113 from Public Health Ethics 12: 2 (July 2019). Oxford University Press / Open access.

73 Udo Schüklenk, “What Healthcare Professionals Owe Us: Why Their Duty to Treat During a Pandemic is Contingent on Personal Protective Equipment (PPE),” pp. 432–435 from Journal of Medical Ethics 46: 7 (2020).

74 Mark R. Wicclair, “Conscientious Objection in Health Care,” in Hugh LaFollette (ed.), Ethics in Practice: An Anthology, Fifth Edition (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley‐Blackwell, 2020). Reproduced with permission of John Wiley & Sons.

75 Udo Schüklenk, “Conscientious Objection in Medicine: Accommodation Versus Professionalism and the Public Good,” pp. 47–56 from British Medical Bulletin 126 (2018).

76 Mark Siegler, “Confidentiality in Medicine: A Decrepit Concept,” pp. 1518–1521 from New England Journal of Medicine 307: 24 (December 1982). © 1982 Massachusetts Medical Society. Reproduced with permission of Massachusetts Medical Society.

77 Kenneth Kipnis, “A Defense of Unqualified Medical Confidentiality,” pp. 7–18 from American Journal of Bioethics 6: 2 (2006) Reproduced with permission of Taylor & Francis.

78 Immanuel Kant, “On a Supposed Right to Lie from Altruistic Motives,” pp. 361–363 from Critique of Practical Reason and Other Works on the Theory of Ethics, 6th edition, trans. T. K. Abbott (London, 1909). Public domain. This essay was first published in a Berlin periodical in 1797.

Читать дальше
Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

Похожие книги на «Bioethics»

Представляем Вашему вниманию похожие книги на «Bioethics» списком для выбора. Мы отобрали схожую по названию и смыслу литературу в надежде предоставить читателям больше вариантов отыскать новые, интересные, ещё непрочитанные произведения.


Udo Schüklenk - This Is Bioethics
Udo Schüklenk
Отзывы о книге «Bioethics»

Обсуждение, отзывы о книге «Bioethics» и просто собственные мнения читателей. Оставьте ваши комментарии, напишите, что Вы думаете о произведении, его смысле или главных героях. Укажите что конкретно понравилось, а что нет, и почему Вы так считаете.

x