Питер Гётше - Здоровье без побочных эффектов

53. Ioannidis J.P., Lau J. Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: an evaluation of 7 medical areas. JAMA. 2001; 285: 437–43.

54. Savulescu J., Chalmers I., Blunt J. Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountability. BMJ. 1996; 313: 1390–3.

55. Goldbeck-Wood S. Denmark takes a lead on research ethics. BMJ. 1998; 316: 1189.

56. Goldacre B . Bad Pharma. London: Fourth Estate; 2012.

57. Lundh A., Krogsbøll L.T., Gøtzsche P.C . Access to data in industry-sponsored trials. Lancet. 2011; 378: 1995–6.

58. Lundh A., Krogsbøll L.T., Gøtzsche P.C . Sponsors’ participation in conduct and reporting of industry trials: a descriptive study. Trials. 2012; 13: 146.

59. Heran B.S., Wong M.M.Y., Heran I.K., et al. Blood pressure lowering effi cacy of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; 4: CD003823.

60. Directive 2010/84/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. 2010 Dec 15.

61. Gøtzsche P.C., Liberati A., Luca P., et al . Beware of surrogate outcome measures. Int J Technol Ass Health Care. 1996; 12: 238–46.

62. Apolone G., Joppi R., Bertele V., et al . Ten years of marketing approvals of anticancer drugs in Europe: regulatory policy and guidance documents need to fi nd a balance between different pressures. Br J Cancer. 2005; 93: 504–9.

63. Garattini S., Bertele V. Effi cacy, safety, and cost of new anticancer drugs. BMJ. 2002; 325: 269–71.

64. Machin D., Stenning S.P., Parmar M.K.B., et al . Thirty years of Medical Research Council randomized trials in solid tumours. Clin Oncol. 1997; 9: 100–14.

65. Soares H.P., Kumar A., Daniels S., et al . Evaluation of new treatments in radiation oncology: are they better than standard treatments? JAMA. 2005; 293: 970–8.

66. Kumar A., Soares H., Wells R., et al. Are experimental treatments for cancer in children superior to established treatments? Observational study of randomised controlled trials by the Children’s Oncology Group. BMJ. 2005; 331: 1295–8.

67. Avorn J. Powerful Medicines: the benefi ts, risks, and costs of prescription drugs. New York: Vintage Books; 2005.

68. Rochon P.A., Fortin P.R., Dear K.B., et al. Reporting of age data in clinical trials of arthritis. Deficiencies and solutions. Arch Intern Med. 1993; 153: 243–8.

69. Van Spall H.G., Toren A., Kiss A., et al. Eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials published in high-impact general medical journals: a systematic sampling review. JAMA. 2007; 297: 1233–40.

70. Cerreta F., Eichler H.G., Rasi G. Drug policy for an aging population – the European Medicines Agency’s geriatric medicines strategy. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 1972–4.

71. World Medical Association. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. 2008. Available online at: www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/ (accessed 17 July 2013).

72. Whitaker R. Anatomy of an Epidemic. New York: Random House; 2010.

73. Strom B.L. How the US drug safety system should be changed. JAMA. 2006; 295: 2072–5.

74. Ray W.A., Stein C.M . Reform of drug regulation – beyond an independent drug-safety board. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354: 194–201.

75. Newman M. Bitter pills for drug companies. BMJ. 2010; 341: c5095.

76. Alsman S.W. [Hidden research led to wrong recommendations about happy pills]. Økonomisk Ugebrev. 2004 May 3.

77. Senate Republican Policy Committee. Legislative Notice No. 13. S. 1082 – The FDA Revitalization Act. Available online at: http://rpc.senate.gov/_fi les/L13S1082FDARevitalizationAct043007KP.pdf (accessed 30 October 2007).

78. Suntharalingam G., Perry M.R., Ward S., et al . Cytokine storm in a phase 1 trial of the anti-CD 28 monoclonal antibody TGN 1412. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355: 1018–28.

79. Lenzer J., Brownlee S. An untold story? BMJ. 2008; 336: 532–4.

80. Gøtzsche P.C. Why we need easy access to all data from all clinical trials and how to accomplish it. Trials. 2011; 12: 249.

81. Danish Medicines Agency. [Danish Medicines Agency’s Performance Contract 2007–2010]. Available online at: www.laegemiddelstyrelsen.dk/db/fi larkiv/6653/resultatkontrakt2007_2010.pdf (accessed 15 August 2008).

82. Okie S. Safety in numbers – monitoring risk in approved drugs. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352:1173–6.

83. Carlsen L.T. [A diffi cult balance]. Tænk + Test. 2003; 32: 30–3.

84. Mundy A . Dispensing with the Truth. New York: St. Martin’s Press; 2001.

85. Schwartz L.M., Woloshin S., Welch H.G . Using a drug facts box to communicate drug benefits and harms: two randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 150: 516–27.

86. Woloshin S., Schwartz L.M., Welch H.G. Know your Chances: understanding health statistics. Berkely: University of California Press; 2008.

87. Woloshin S., Schwartz L.M. Think inside the box. New York Times. 2011 July 4.

88. Chren M.M., Landefeld C.S . Physicians’ behavior and their interactions with drug companies. A controlled study of physicians who requested additions to a hospital drug formulary. JAMA. 1994; 271: 684–9.

89. Brennan T.A., Rothman D.J., Blank L., et al. Health industry practices that create confl icts of interest: a policy proposal for academic medical centers. JAMA. 2006; 295: 429–33.

90. Tougaard H., Hundevadt K. [The golden promises of the gynaecologists]. Jyllandsposten. 2004 Jan 18.

91. Fugh-Berman A., McDonald C.P., Bell A.M., et al. Promotional tone in reviews of menopausal hormone therapy after the women’s health initiative: an analysis of published articles. PLoS Med. 2011; 8: e1000425.

92. Singer N. Medical papers by ghostwriters pushed therapy. New York Times. 2009 Aug 4.

93. Rosenberg M. Pfizer’s ghostwritten journal articles are still standing, still bogus. Online Journal. 2010 Feb 23.

94. Gøtzsche P.C. Mammography Screening: truth, lies and controversy. London: Radcliffe Publishing; 2012.

195. Conflicts of interest in biomedical research. Canada’s Voice for Academics. 2003; 50: Feb.

196. Elliott C. Pharma goes to the laundry: public relations and the business of medical education. Hastings Cent Rep. 2004; 34: 18–23.

197. Willman D. How a new policy led to seven deadly drugs. Los Angeles Times. 2000 Dec 20.

198. Bindslev J.B., Schroll J., Gøtzsche P.C., et al. Underreporting of confl icts of interest in clinical practice guidelines: cross-sectional study. BMC Med Ethics. 2013; 14: 19.

199. Steinbrook R. Controlling confl ict of interest – proposals from the Institute of Medicine. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360: 2160–3.

100. Zinner D.E., Bolcic-Jankovic D., Clarridge B., et al. Participation of academic scientists in relationships with industry. Health Aff. 2009; 28: 1814–25.

101. Lenzer J. French guidelines are pulled over potential bias among authors. BMJ. 2011; 342: d4007.

102. Clinard M.B., Yeager P.C . Corporate Crime. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers; 2006.

103. Reuters. Factbox – The 20 largest pharmaceutical companies. 2010 Mar 26. Available online at: www.reuters.com/article/2010/03/26/pharmaceutical-mergers-idUSN2612865020100326 (accessed 17 June 2012).

104. Wikipedia. List of countries by GDP (nominal). Available online at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal) (accessed 30 June 2012).