John Medhurst - No Less Than Mystic - A History of Lenin and the Russian Revolution for a 21st-Century Left

Здесь есть возможность читать онлайн «John Medhurst - No Less Than Mystic - A History of Lenin and the Russian Revolution for a 21st-Century Left» весь текст электронной книги совершенно бесплатно (целиком полную версию без сокращений). В некоторых случаях можно слушать аудио, скачать через торрент в формате fb2 и присутствует краткое содержание. Город: London, Год выпуска: 2017, ISBN: 2017, Издательство: Repeater Books, Жанр: История, Политика, Публицистика, на английском языке. Описание произведения, (предисловие) а так же отзывы посетителей доступны на портале библиотеки ЛибКат.

No Less Than Mystic: A History of Lenin and the Russian Revolution for a 21st-Century Left: краткое содержание, описание и аннотация

Предлагаем к чтению аннотацию, описание, краткое содержание или предисловие (зависит от того, что написал сам автор книги «No Less Than Mystic: A History of Lenin and the Russian Revolution for a 21st-Century Left»). Если вы не нашли необходимую информацию о книге — напишите в комментариях, мы постараемся отыскать её.

Published in the centenary year of the 1917 Russian Revolution, No Less Than Mystic is a fresh and iconoclastic history of Lenin and the Bolsheviks for a generation uninterested in Cold War ideologies and stereotypes.
Although it offers a full and complete history of Leninism, 1917, the Russian Civil War and its aftermath, the book devotes more time than usual to the policies and actions of the socialist alternatives to Bolshevism–to the Menshevik Internationalists, the Socialist Revolutionaries (SRs), the Jewish Bundists and the anarchists. It prioritises Factory Committees, local Soviets, the Womens’ Zhenotdel movement, Proletkult and the Kronstadt sailors as much as the statements and actions of Lenin and Trotsky. Using the neglected writings and memoirs of Mensheviks like Julius Martov, SRs like Victor Chernov, Bolshevik oppositionists like Alexandra Kollontai and anarchists like Nestor Makhno, it traces a revolution gone wrong and suggests how it might have produced a more libertarian, emancipatory socialism than that created by Lenin and the Bolsheviks.
Although the book broadly covers the period from 1903 (the formation of the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks) to 1921 (the suppression of the Kronstadt rebellion) and explains why the Bolshevik Revolution degenerated so quickly into its apparent opposite, it continually examines the Leninist experiment through the lens of a 21st century, de-centralised, ecological, anti-productivist and feminist socialism. Throughout its narrative it interweaves and draws parallels with contemporary anti-capitalist struggles such as those of the Zapatistas, the Kurds, the Argentinean “Recovered Factories”, Occupy, the Arab Spring, the Indignados and Intersectional feminists, attempting to open up the past to the present and points in between.
We do not need another standard history of the Russian Revolution. This is not one.

No Less Than Mystic: A History of Lenin and the Russian Revolution for a 21st-Century Left — читать онлайн бесплатно полную книгу (весь текст) целиком

Ниже представлен текст книги, разбитый по страницам. Система сохранения места последней прочитанной страницы, позволяет с удобством читать онлайн бесплатно книгу «No Less Than Mystic: A History of Lenin and the Russian Revolution for a 21st-Century Left», без необходимости каждый раз заново искать на чём Вы остановились. Поставьте закладку, и сможете в любой момент перейти на страницу, на которой закончили чтение.

Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

At this point Kornilov, urged on by the Society and reactionaries at Army HQ, began to plan a military coup. After informing his soldiers that the Bolsheviks were attempting an insurrection he ordered the Savage Division to advance on the capital and to depose the Soviet. No sooner was this known than the Soviet formed a “Committee of Struggle against Counter-Revolution”, composed of three representatives each from the Mensheviks, Bolsheviks and SRs. Similar committees sprung up throughout the northern region of European Russia. The most active elements were the Bolsheviks, whose Red Guards were armed, organised and ready to defend the capital. The Kronstadt sailors again crossed the Gulf of Finland to Petrograd, this time at the request of the Soviet that they defend it from attack.

With the defence secure the Committee of Struggle sent out agitators to talk to soldiers closing in on the city. In the meantime, the militant All-Russian Union of Railwaymen blocked railway tracks and sent carriages with Kornilov’s troops off in different directions. This gave time for Red Guards to reach the foot soldiers and to explain that they had been lied to and there was no Bolshevik coup. The Savage Division disintegrated, some refusing to advance and some simply deserting. When Kornilov realised that his power play had failed he resigned from his post and was arrested. Not one shot had been fired.

Militant workers, mostly Bolshevik, had saved Kerensky’s government, and he had little choice but to quietly release the jailed Bolshevik leaders. In the wake of the failed military coup a wave of reprisals against the officer corps swept the army and navy, with officers in many cities arrested. According to the Bolshevik militant Podvoysky:

As a result of the Kornilov revolt the propaganda of the military organisation and pro-Bolshevik soldiers, which had been temporarily quelled after the July reaction, now spread with renewed energy among the troops and found a most receptive audience in the nervously exhausted mass of soldiers who refused to wait, who would not consider anything or listen to anyone. 2

At Kronstadt three generals and a colonel, arrested on the orders of the Soviet Executive, were dragged to the bridge of one of the ships, thrown off, and gunned down in the water. In all eleven officers were murdered at the naval base. At the height of the drama one of the Kronstadt sailors asked Trotsky if now was not the time to press on and depose Kerensky. He replied, “No, not yet. Use Kerensky as a gun-rest to shoot Kornilov. Afterward we will settle with Kerensky”. 3

In one stroke the Kornilov “coup” reversed the fortunes of the Bolsheviks and fatally weakened the Provisional Government and its supporters in the Soviet Executive. Suspecting (rightly) that Kerensky had originally intended to use Kornilov against the Soviet, a plan which then backfired, socialist ministers such as Skobelev, Tseretelli and Chernov had no choice but to resign from the government. They were replaced by lesser figures in their parties. This was fatal. In refusing to distance themselves completely from Kerensky, the Mensheviks and SRs lost all credibility with most of the workers in the cities. In the words of Trotsky, the attempted coup “created an abrupt shift in the situation in our favour”, although even before the Kornilov affair the Bolsheviks had already won majorities in the Soviets of Kronstadt, Ekaterinburg, Tsaritsyn, Samara and Ivanovo-Voznesensk.

On 31st August the Petrograd Soviet for the first time passed a Bolshevik resolution, by 279 votes to 115. The resolution demanded a government be formed from “the revolutionary proletariat and peasantry”, and that this be accompanied by immediate peace negotiations, workers’ control of industry and the complete confiscation of the remaining large landed estates. A few days later, on 5th September, the entire Menshevik-SR Executive resigned. The newly elected Executive had a Bolshevik majority with Trotsky as Chair. A resolution from workers at the Petrograd Admiralty yards summed up the new atmosphere. It explicitly condemned the coalition government as “a government of bourgeois-landlord dictatorship” with a policy of “ruinous compromise with the propertied classes”. 4The effect on the Bolshevik Party was electric. Membership of its Petrograd branch alone jumped from 16,000 in April to 43,000 in October. Many of the new recruits were disillusioned Mensheviks and SRs.

Kerensky knew that his government, never having been elected, lacked legitimacy. In the absence of a properly elected Constituent Assembly, elections to which the government had postponed to November because of the immense logistical difficulties involved, he proposed a “Democratic Conference” of all left parties, cooperative bodies and Zemstvos to appoint a Provisional Council or “Pre-Parliament”. The Pre-Parliament would, in theory, command wide-spread support on the left, thus stabilising the government until the elections to the Constituent Assembly. Lenin sensed the danger of this plan and urged that the Bolsheviks boycott the conference. Other Bolsheviks, primarily Lenin’s senior lieutenant Lev Kamenev, disagreed. Kamenev wished for the Bolsheviks to attend the Democratic Conference and then to act as a radical left opposition in the Pre-Parliament in alliance with Martov and the Left Mensheviks. Lenin, still in hiding in the Finnish capital Helsinki, sent fierce letters to the Bolshevik Central Committee urging an immediate insurrection against a weakened Provisional Government.

Dogged by Lenin’s accusations that those who wished to work with the Democratic Conference were “unprincipled”, the Central Committee gave Trotsky permission to attend the conference as long as he did so solely to denounce Kerensky and announce that the Bolsheviks would have nothing to do with the Pre-Parliament. Lenin and Trotsky quickly divined that (as Trotsky later put it), “the struggle for our participation in the Pre-Parliament was the struggle for the ‘Europeanization’ of the working class movement, for directing it as quickly as possible into the channel of a democratic struggle for power, i.e. into the channel of social democracy”. 5The Democratic Conference went ahead but it did not have the effect Kerensky had hoped for.

By the end of September, the government was on its last legs. More landed estates were being seized by the peasants. The supply of food to the cities began to break down. Militarily the Germans threatened Petrograd itself, with the German navy roaming freely in the Gulf of Finland, while conservatives like former Duma President Rodzianko admitted they would “rejoice” if the German army took Petrograd and “restored order”.

The Pre-Parliament was the last spasm of constitutional politics in 1917. With its failure the Bolsheviks moved towards an armed insurrection against the Provisional Government, the first and most important step of which was the creation by the Petrograd Soviet Executive on 9th October of a “Military Revolutionary Committee” (MRC). The MRC was formed ostensibly to coordinate the defence of the city against German attack, but in reality it would be the organisational centre of the October Insurrection. The key to its success was that it did this in the name of the Soviet, not the Bolshevik Party.

The responsibilities of the MRC, granted by the Soviet, were to establish how many troops were needed to defend Petrograd and ensure manpower and munitions were available; to coordinate the efforts of the Baltic Fleet, the Finnish garrison, and the Northern Front; to formulate a plan of defence of the capital; and to keep order in the city. To carry out these tasks it formed separate sub-committees dealing with defence, supplies, liaison, information and a workers’ militia. The MRC consisted of three Bolsheviks and two “Left SRs”, with Trotsky as Chairman. He later acknowledged that the Left SRs were there merely to disguise that the MRC answered to the Bolshevik Party and not the Soviet Executive. He told them little of its real plans. 6

Читать дальше
Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

Похожие книги на «No Less Than Mystic: A History of Lenin and the Russian Revolution for a 21st-Century Left»

Представляем Вашему вниманию похожие книги на «No Less Than Mystic: A History of Lenin and the Russian Revolution for a 21st-Century Left» списком для выбора. Мы отобрали схожую по названию и смыслу литературу в надежде предоставить читателям больше вариантов отыскать новые, интересные, ещё непрочитанные произведения.


Отзывы о книге «No Less Than Mystic: A History of Lenin and the Russian Revolution for a 21st-Century Left»

Обсуждение, отзывы о книге «No Less Than Mystic: A History of Lenin and the Russian Revolution for a 21st-Century Left» и просто собственные мнения читателей. Оставьте ваши комментарии, напишите, что Вы думаете о произведении, его смысле или главных героях. Укажите что конкретно понравилось, а что нет, и почему Вы так считаете.

x