Michael Neufeld - The Rocket and the Reich
Здесь есть возможность читать онлайн «Michael Neufeld - The Rocket and the Reich» весь текст электронной книги совершенно бесплатно (целиком полную версию без сокращений). В некоторых случаях можно слушать аудио, скачать через торрент в формате fb2 и присутствует краткое содержание. Город: Washington, Год выпуска: 2013, ISBN: 2013, Издательство: Smithsonian Books, Жанр: История, military_weapon, на английском языке. Описание произведения, (предисловие) а так же отзывы посетителей доступны на портале библиотеки ЛибКат.
- Название:The Rocket and the Reich
- Автор:
- Издательство:Smithsonian Books
- Жанр:
- Год:2013
- Город:Washington
- ISBN:978-1-58834-466-3
- Рейтинг книги:3 / 5. Голосов: 1
-
Избранное:Добавить в избранное
- Отзывы:
-
Ваша оценка:
- 60
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
The Rocket and the Reich: краткое содержание, описание и аннотация
Предлагаем к чтению аннотацию, описание, краткое содержание или предисловие (зависит от того, что написал сам автор книги «The Rocket and the Reich»). Если вы не нашли необходимую информацию о книге — напишите в комментариях, мы постараемся отыскать её.
The Rocket and the Reich — читать онлайн бесплатно полную книгу (весь текст) целиком
Ниже представлен текст книги, разбитый по страницам. Система сохранения места последней прочитанной страницы, позволяет с удобством читать онлайн бесплатно книгу «The Rocket and the Reich», без необходимости каждый раз заново искать на чём Вы остановились. Поставьте закладку, и сможете в любой момент перейти на страницу, на которой закончили чтение.
Интервал:
Закладка:
Whether von Braun’s SS rank influenced Himmler’s interest in Peenemünde in early 1943 is unclear. The promotions notwithstanding, von Braun is known to have worn his uniform only once, and that was during Himmler’s second visit in June 1943, when Dornberger allegedly ordered him to do it. In March and April of that year, the thirty-one-year-old Technical Director also used his rank, as he needed to, when applying to the SS Race and Settlement Office for permission to marry. (For unknown reasons, the marriage to a Berlin physical education teacher never took place.) On the second of two letters to the Office he added a handwritten salutation to Himmler: “Führer!” But he never used his rank on any other correspondence and appears not to have been proud of his SS membership. Himmler may well have perceived von Braun’s lack of ideological commitment, since he was energetically pushing the BMW rocket engineer Helmut von Zborowski at the time. Only later would von Braun’s rank and position become of greater significance in Himmler’s plans. 29
At the end of March 1943 a new opportunity to meddle in Peenemünde’s affairs presented itself to the SS. The Gestapo had arrested an anti-Nazi group led by Catholic priests in the nearby city of Stettin (now Szczecin, Poland). Because the Commander of Peenemünde, Colonel Leo Zanssen, was a Catholic and was politically suspect, the local SS and police commander, Emil Mazuw, thought he might be part of the conspiracy. Himmler telegraphed Gottlob Berger to use his personal connection (Stegmaier) to obtain more information on Zanssen. Berger asked the chief of the Development Works to visit him clandestinely over the weekend. Stegmaier could not confirm the charges, but he gave the SS some of what it wanted. According to Berger’s report of April 5, Zanssen was an old-fashioned officer out of touch with the common man and National Socialism. He dampened his subordinates’ enthusiasm for work and was a member of a leading Catholic society. More than that: “ Zansen [sic] is an alcoholic. When he is overcome with a howling depression, which happens often, particularly under the influence of alcohol, he writes religious and sentimental letters and gives religious and sentimental speeches.” 30
Stegmaier had stabbed his superior in the back. It is true that Zanssen was not universally popular; he was excitable and could get very angry. Some leading Peenemünders were friendly with him, others less so, including, apparently, Stegmaier. Zanssen was also known to be a social drinker, but the charge that he was an alcoholic was false, as was the claim that he was a member of the “Catholic Action.” In the tradition of the German officer corps, Zanssen was not outspokenly religious; his wife and children were in fact Protestant. The real problem was his increasingly apparent alienation with the Third Reich. In 1933 Zanssen, like many junior officers, had been enthusiastic about the “national revolution.” When the Nazis came to power, he even made his children stand up at the dinner table and sing the Party anthem, the “Horst Wessel Song,” although he was never a member. But at some point he started to grow more and more disillusioned. His wife later attributed that to his service on the Eastern front in 1941–42. He did not go out of his way to pay obeisance to local Party officials and, under the influence of a drink or two, he would become careless about expressing his views. In Mazuw’s original telegram to Himmler, the SS commander had noted that he and the Gauleiter (regional Party leader) for Pomerania had known Zanssen for years and “had never placed great trust in him.” 31
Himmler told Berger, who was in Berlin, to bring the matter up with Speer and also to inform Ernst Kaltenbrunner’s Reich Security Main Office, of which the Gestapo was a part. Apparently the ensuing investigations produced no evidence that Zanssen had anything to with the Catholic priests or any substantial proof of the Peenemünde Commander’s disloyalty. But before those investigations were even completed, the Reichsführer-SS decided to try to undermine Zanssen through another route, perhaps in the hope that Stegmaier would be made Commander. On April 24 Himmler wrote to General Rudolf Schmundt, Hitler’s OKW adjutant and head of the Army Personnel Office since October 1942, when it had been moved directly into Führer headquarters. He disingenuously reported Stegmaier’s accusations to Schmundt without claiming to have verified them. After a two-week delay, on May 6 Army Ordnance suddenly received a call from the Personnel Office that Zanssen was to be removed from his position immediately as a security risk. 32
Dornberger and Zanssen were thunderstruck. The Commander of Peenemünde-East officially withdrew from the Catholic Church the same day and spent a sleepless night pacing the floor. Dornberger frantically attempted to find out what was behind the demeaning treatment of his close friend. Until that time, neither had been informed that Zanssen was under suspicion, although the Gestapo had indicated to the Commander that it had planted an agent in Peenemünde to investigate possible connections with the anti-Nazi group. As Zanssen told a police official a few days later, he suspected that his dismissal was due to the machinations of private industry (meaning Degenkolb’s cronies) to get rid of Dornberger and himself and take over Peenemünde. 33
Pending a final resolution of Zanssen’s fate, Dornberger issued an order on May 11 appointing himself Commander and assigning his friend to Berlin to act as his representative at Wa Prüf 11. Backed by the Chief of Army Armaments, General Fromm, who was outraged by the way the order had come down from Führer headquarters, Dornberger then set out to clear Zanssen’s name. In short order Dornberger discovered who was behind the accusations: Stegmaier. He probably surmised this from the copy he had received of Himmler’s letter to Schmundt. Dornberger’s reaction to the information news is surprising: He merely gave Stegmaier a reprimand. As he explained in his letter to Ordnance Chief Leeb in early June, Stegmaier had been afflicted by a “real contradiction” between his loyalty to his superior officers and his loyalty to Nazism. Because of his friendship with Berger and his “lack of trust” in Dornberger, Stegmaier had therefore repeated his hostile views about Zanssen to Berger. 34
Dornberger was angry, but he gave Stegmaier some leeway because his own loyalty to Hitler and the Third Reich was unquestioning, which could not be said of Zanssen. In his notebooks one can find a draft of the pep talk he gave to his senior subordinates on assuming the Commander’s post on May 12. He states: “My National Socialist beliefs should be widely known.” He goes on to say that his sole aim was “put in the hands of the Führer sufficient numbers of this weapon [the A-4], which—it is my conviction and unshakable belief—will decide the war.” In the pseudo-apolitical tradition of the officer corps, neither he nor Stegmaier was a member of the Nazi party or its principal organizations, but because he was also afflicted with conflicting loyalties to Nazism and the Army, he gave Stegmaier rather mild treatment, even though the Development Works chief had betrayed one of his closest friends. 35
In the end, Zanssen’s name was cleared and Himmler had to back away from the affair. Fromm sent a letter to the Reichsführer-SS, based on a Dornberger draft, which strongly contested the charges. Because there was no solid evidence of Zanssen’s disloyalty, Himmler asked Berger what he should reply. The chief of the SS Main Office responded that Thom and Dornberger had visited him a number of times and he had offered this explanation: “In view of the special importance of secrecy, it was a purely comradely gesture” to make the Army aware of Zanssen’s questionable statements in letters and elsewhere! Himmler should take nothing back, Berger suggested, but rather should leave it to Berger to give the same explanation to Fromm. It was an incredibly cynical letter that revealed in its very first line Himmler’s attempt to exploit the affair: “The Col. Zansen case has not turned out quite the way we expected.” 36
Читать дальшеИнтервал:
Закладка:
Похожие книги на «The Rocket and the Reich»
Представляем Вашему вниманию похожие книги на «The Rocket and the Reich» списком для выбора. Мы отобрали схожую по названию и смыслу литературу в надежде предоставить читателям больше вариантов отыскать новые, интересные, ещё непрочитанные произведения.
Обсуждение, отзывы о книге «The Rocket and the Reich» и просто собственные мнения читателей. Оставьте ваши комментарии, напишите, что Вы думаете о произведении, его смысле или главных героях. Укажите что конкретно понравилось, а что нет, и почему Вы так считаете.