Oleg Oka - The theory of everything, which is not

And being of the Mind, intuitively feeling their nepriyatnosti the world, confirms this – the Mind seeks to free itself from the imposed structure (and why in the Word of GOD constantly exaggerated rejection of Samudra, the sinfulness of any irrational action, COMPLETE trust (FAITH) GOD. I.e., the rejection of personal bias and rejection of the status quo.

However, the media mind lives obeying the feeling, emotions that do not depend on logic and even self preservation. There is a systematic destruction of the biosphere of the Earth, although people understand samobytnoe such practices, people are constantly destroying their own kind, and this from the very beginning was a little if not a necessary condition of human community, and this despite the fact that life (own) is the person in the first place in a series of values of life.

Here you can see the opposition between the pure Mind – the phenomenon of Space (the Universe) and Person – synthesis of the mind (soul) and body, spiritual and material. Personality cannot exist beyond this material world, the Mind is weary of its limitations, locality, temporality. The mind seeks the ABSOLUTENESS of the UNIVERSE, ignoring the world and life…

The closest to understanding the will of GOD came Strugatsky “for a Billion years before the end of the world”. (As far as I know). But then functions of this system they didn’t (did not dare… or they don’t have such problem). In General, the attitude to GOD they have a dual – realizing that without IT, the picture of the world absolutely not functional, knowing (or suspecting) about HIS dominance, they are afraid of stating this fact, because it denies all their literary construction (the very meaning of their life). They don’t want to admit that it has serious value (and any suemudrie, including mine.). However, of course, I can’t for them to say something specific. Just my impression.

…So, no GOOD and EVIL really is just that the imperatives of this condition of human civilization, existing ethical system. Categories established by the people only for the convenience of communication. This topic has already been said so much that no man here can say something new. Good or evil – to deprive of life of the terminally ill, the host of the agony, and every second cursing others, supporting life in it – contrary to his pleas?! (for me personally the greatest evil in the human heart is when a person puts himself above others, and thus perceive others as subhuman. If he has the means to achieve their goals – examples of this are known to all… Good or evil to take the life of this monster?)

Yes, GOD gives us in the Book, HIS idealistic benchmarks, but in the Bible there are only functions, endowed with the properties of IT, IT Will, but not real people. And because HE gave us Freedom of choice (that is not restricted to attitudes). The main thing – to live according to HIS Will, guided by the commandments; that is what is said to THEM (AND. X.) in the sermon on the mount, and not giving the rest of us countless interpreters of HIS Words. HE said;

– " Will everyone teach his brother; – Behold the Lord their GOD, Because I’ll be in my heart and the heart of every …”

Scientist-ophthalmologist Muldashev E. R., a specialist in the mysterious land of Shambala, justified in their doctrine the thesis of the savagery of mankind. What he means by this term is unknown, it could be a dumbing down of the mind? Or regression of the process of thinking…

But scientists delights, he proves the following ethnographic “experiments” :

– … Two years ago I came to Indonesia at the invitation of chief ophthalmologist of the country (also a specialist gnoseology, obviously …). I liked the Indonesian doctors: smiling, enthusiastic and keen interest in everything new, they gave the impression of a highly civilized and highly educated people. However, I was tempted to ask them about cannibalism, which we know from school, it was common in this country.

– Tell me, do you people eat? – do not resist, I asked the chief ophthalmologist in a private conversation.

Savages do not take knowledge, – said the chief ophthalmologist… they are like animals live by instinct. Perhaps many years ago these tribes were more civilized, but completely and irrevocably alienated.

– I understand from your words that if people moved to a primitive way of life and alienated, then return them to civilized forms of life is impossible. —

– I think so, ' said chief ophthalmologist.

– I’ve been in these tribes, tried to heal their eyes… They don’t understand, their brains are poorly developed. —

I paused. It is the process of brutalization, it was impossible to stop! Savagery is coming for all! …

– “… Only the Lemurians escaped the mass savagery… Atlanta has undergone a process of mass savagery twice.” —

( Lobsang Rampa, “Doctor from Lhasa”, 1994, p. 236 )

– “… But not all feral people on earth had died, they, as we know, is still preserved in many regions of the earth…” —

– … Amazonian Indians living by collecting latex from rubber trees and fishing. They put nets woven from cords, fish-pirarucu weighing up to 300 pounds. If you catch a fish – eat her whole village, if not – all hungry.

“Tell me,” I asked one of the Indians, more or less spoke English, crocodile and Anaconda attack people? —

“Of course,” replied the Indian. – Crocodiles eat women, and anacondas – men. —

– Why is it so selectively? —

– And look, look at my second wife, – nodded the Indian in the river.

– She washes dishes on the banks. So did my first wife was washing dishes on the banks, when it quietly sailed crocodile dragged her into the water and devoured … —

– And you’re afraid for your second wife? —

– Fear, of course. But, probably, it is also eaten by a crocodile. Because a woman needs to wash dishes on the beach. If eaten by a crocodile, I’ll take number three, ' said the Indian…

So, will survive if the savages and semi-wild state? Probably still no. —

In fact, perhaps I should think about In light of the research mentioned academician, “doomsday” is quite possible, and not because of some natural disasters. Nature does not like exceptions. And if the starting point is to take Dr. muldasheva, as the zero point of the vector of the savagery of mankind, the phenomenon spread to the entire population of the Earth over the lifetime of one or two generations.

And most importantly, we do not note… As a respected Muldashev E. R.…

I respect Bertrand Russell-philosopher; he does not hide his thoughts of ingenious constructions pseudophilosophical terminology.

With him I want to argue, because in a dispute born … well … especially such a sore subject – " is There life after death.”

Unequivocally – NO. I did not say, and some ancient Greek (can’t remember) – the question if he is afraid of death, the response was :

– How can you be afraid of what is not? After all, when we are alive, death is absent, and when it comes – we are no longer … —

Only I do not understand the evasive position B. Russell ;

– “Before discussing the question of whether we continue to exist after death, it should be clarified in what sense man is the same person I was yesterday…” —

That is, on behalf of the philosophers, Russell believes, “… that there are certain substances – soul and body, and each of them has continuously existed from day to day…” – and – “that the soul, being created, continues to exist forever, while the body temporarily ceases to exist by reason of death, until, unless there is a resurrection…” —