Юрий Низовцев - New – by the opposite – proof of the presence of God

ew – by the opposite – proof of the presence of God

The intelligence of the person is feeble, his life is short, and the real world is infinitely various. Some established patterns during cognition, flow of life are changed by others; new relationships, communications emerge.

At this, the world of the human relations is more complex and unstable, than the physical world. All achievements of human thought don't lead to elimination of dissociation of certain individuals and different peoples.

The nature shows the force periodically, incomparable with human, easily breaking any human construction, as and the person, despite a present technical equipment of mankind.

Beingness in the usual formulation is understood as existence of real. However, in our opinion, this understanding isn't enough because to explain how separate, this existence is impossible.

Therefore, for some inevitably arises God – a first principle and the propulsion of this real.

The opposite camp as opposed to this view puts forward a hypothesis of the self-development of matter.

Neither one nor the other does not seem to be a satisfactory interpretation of the existence of real.

As for God, this all-powerful, living, external and infinite being is so contradictory and fantastic in an interpretation of theologians that one can only believe in him from hopelessness, which is what happens. We will dwell on these and other properties of God in more detail below.

If to present matter in the form of a certain formation, which in itself moves and always moved, and in this motion forms all the rest including consciousness, then, first, if to prove that motion is visibility, more precisely, that it is secondary, appearing only owing to technical transformation of process of updating of information copies of things in consciousness of the living beings into motion, then there cannot be any self-development of matter. Secondly, it has long been proven that the genome of any living being is so complex that in any case it couldn't self-assemble, self-develop. Nevertheless, alive exists, and even exist self-conscious living beings, that is, people themselves. Thirdly, since it is recognized that self-development is ongoing as an unceasing progress, then for it there must be initial and final conditions.

All this means that thinkers of all times have underestimated the complexity and ambiguity of the fact that we – people – are, and what we are situated in.

The religion uses uncertain and even empty expression "an ideal", contrasting it to the material, whereas "an ideal" absolutely nothing doesn't mean, except that it is something incorporeal, perfect, universal, complete, abstract. All these definitions have no relation to objective reality, at this we don't know anything about the external in relation to a reality, and even if to assume that there is something perfect, then it is for us nothing inasmuch it is outside time, i.e. it doesn't exist separately.

The incorporeal is something with no signs of any base, that is – nothingness, or a non-existence. "Nothingness" can "evade" from a non-existence if only it is manifested as Everything, as eternal, coinciding (Uniform), and along with that is manifested in time as the finite in infinity.

The term "existence" together with the prefix "co" (co-existence) each person intuitively understands as events and if to think further, "event" is happening to someone and to something in some space and in some time, i.e. in routine (this we call beingness). But division of beingness on time, space and movement of things in it happens only in consciousness of the person, and we watch this partitioned beingness personally.

However, we know nothing about something, being situated outside our sensations, i.e. what we feel. Therefore, is reasonable to ask: is there anything outside of consciousness (sensations)?

After all, beingness is "enlivened" only by the presence of the live and the term "beingness" means the being of someone in something. Thus, meaning of beingness as receptacles of things, apparently, consists in "a service" of the live, which watches, acts, i.e. not necessarily of the person, but surely – consciousness which in the highest expression possesses not only ability to feel in own carrier, but – also ability to understand, and including itself.

If mentally to exclude consciousness, "having left" beingness as a repository of things alone in the residue, it becomes as a non-existence. What's the difference, there is something there or not? All the same anybody isn't present there. If, on the contrary, to exclude things, having left consciousness in loneliness, it at once loses life – there are no things, time, space, motion, – there are no and the existence as such, so as consciousness loses a support and at the same time – resistance of something, and without a thing it isn't present a subject neither for sensations, nor for speculations, nor for actions. In other words, beingness doesn't exist out of consciousness, and consciousness is incapable to exist without things, what means the indissolubility of beingness and consciousness in the basis, i.e. – their unity. Means, in the basis – out of time, or in infinity, they make organic whole, and they can be designated as Uniform. It is necessary only to learn a method of their "output" from eternal and infinite Uniform, i.e. to try to come nearer to the truth which is secret of Creation.

Beingness, if to consider it as everything that exists, or the existing real, cannot manifest itself in the absence of consciousness in it. In other words, consciousness in it is mute it can't be shown in any way. In other words, if consciousness was not, as such, then and beingness wouldn't be – there would be nothing. This fact is, apparently, the prime cause of the appearance in the human mind of the concept of Creator God.

Group of physicists under the direction of Alain Aspect at the Parisian university in 1982 revealed that in particular conditions the elementary particles, for example, electrons, are able to instantly communicate with one another regardless of the distance between them. In other words, each particle knows always that another does, irrespective of distance between them. On this experimental basis the theory of the holographic Universe was developed. Any particle of this Universe is a holographic projection of the single reality. It has been assumed, as a corollary of this theory, that the physical density of the world is holographic frequency setting, and, in particular, that the person is the hologram.

The physicist of the London University David Bohm deduces the main postulate out of this experiment: "The new form of comprehension probably can be called the Inseparable Wholeness in Flowing Motion". This point of view means that the stream, in any sense, precedes "things", whose origin and dissolution happens in this stream. Bohm notes that "each relatively self-contained and steady structure has to be understood not as something independently and constantly existing, but rather as the derivative, given rise in complete motion of the stream and, eventually, dissolving in the same stream. The fact how it is generated and supports the existence therefore depends on its local function into the stream". As suggested by Bohm, motion is primary; and that seems to us by constant structures, is only relatively autonomous subordinate essences which are appearing out of integrity of flowing motion and then are dissolved back in it. This process of formation goes infinitely. It is possible to believe also that Bohm brought out of discovery of Aspect following: the objective reality does not exist and that, despite its apparent density, the Universe in the basis – fantastic picture, the huge, magnificently detailed hologram [1].