Thom Hartmann - The Crash of 2016

Здесь есть возможность читать онлайн «Thom Hartmann - The Crash of 2016» весь текст электронной книги совершенно бесплатно (целиком полную версию без сокращений). В некоторых случаях можно слушать аудио, скачать через торрент в формате fb2 и присутствует краткое содержание. Город: New York, Год выпуска: 2013, ISBN: 2013, Издательство: Twelve Books, Жанр: Публицистика, Политика, на английском языке. Описание произведения, (предисловие) а так же отзывы посетителей доступны на портале библиотеки ЛибКат.

The Crash of 2016: краткое содержание, описание и аннотация

Предлагаем к чтению аннотацию, описание, краткое содержание или предисловие (зависит от того, что написал сам автор книги «The Crash of 2016»). Если вы не нашли необходимую информацию о книге — напишите в комментариях, мы постараемся отыскать её.

The United States is more vulnerable today than ever before—including during the Great Depression and the Civil War—because the pillars of democracy that once supported a booming middle class have been corrupted, and without them, America teeters on the verge of the next Great Crash.
The United States is in the midst of an economic implosion that could make the Great Depression look like child's play. In THE CRASH OF 2016, Thom Hartmann argues that the facade of our once-great United States will soon disintegrate to reveal the rotting core where corporate and billionaire power and greed have replaced democratic infrastructure and governance. Our once-enlightened political and economic systems have been manipulated to ensure the success of only a fraction of the population at the expense of the rest of us.
The result is a “for the rich, by the rich” scheme leading to policies that only benefit the highest bidders. Hartmann outlines the destructive forces-planted by Lewis Powell in 1971 and come to fruition with the “Reagan Revolution”—that have looted our nation over the past decade, and how their actions fit into a cycle of American history that lets such forces rise to power every four generations.
However, a backlash is now palpable against the “economic royalists”—a term coined by FDR to describe those hoarding power and wealth-including the banksters, oligarchs, and politicians who have plunged our nation into economic chaos and social instability.
Although we are in the midst of what could become the most catastrophic economic crash in American History, a way forward is emerging, just as it did in the previous great crashes of the 1760s, 1856, and 1929. The choices we make now will redefine American culture. Before us stands a genuine opportunity to embrace the moral motive over the profit motive—and to rebuild the American economic model that once yielded great success.
Thoroughly researched and passionately argued, THE CRASH OF 2016 is not just a roadmap to redemption in post-Crash America, but a critical wake-up call, challenging us to act. Only if the right reforms are enacted and the moral choices are made, can we avert disaster and make our nation whole again.

The Crash of 2016 — читать онлайн бесплатно полную книгу (весь текст) целиком

Ниже представлен текст книги, разбитый по страницам. Система сохранения места последней прочитанной страницы, позволяет с удобством читать онлайн бесплатно книгу «The Crash of 2016», без необходимости каждый раз заново искать на чём Вы остановились. Поставьте закладку, и сможете в любой момент перейти на страницу, на которой закончили чтение.

Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

If we add to all of this some good scientific innovation in developing a mix of low-carbon energy resources (biomass, geothermal, wind, tidal power, and so on), and can figure out a way to strip the carbon dioxide out of our power-plant smokestacks (and our atmosphere) and turn it into a solid (calcium carbonate—which you can buy at the store under the brand name Tums—is a good candidate for a desirable product produced by binding carbon, in this case to calcium), it’s not inconceivable that by 2050 we could cut our CO 2emissions by over 80 percent. And perhaps even decades sooner, if we begin now. 198Plus we could strip oil of its strategic value and make our nation independent of Middle Eastern dictatorships.

Tipping Point Reached

A new study by the research firm Bloomberg New Energy Finance has found that unsubsidized renewable energy is now cheaper than fossil fuels such as coal and gas.

In fact, it’s a lot cheaper.

Data show that wind farms in Australia can produce energy at AU$80/MWh (megawatt hour). Meanwhile, coal plants are producing energy at AU$143/MWh and gas at AU$116/MWh.

Unlike the United States, where energy companies can pollute and have the costs (from illness to environmental degradation) picked up by the taxpayers, Australia has a carbon tax, which partially explains why renewables have a price advantage. But the data show that even without the cost of the carbon tax factored in, wind energy is still 14 cents cheaper than coal and 18 cents cheaper than gas.

And this is in a nation that relies more heavily on coal than any other industrialized nation in the world. But that coal reliance will soon change, because companies in Australia are quickly adopting new, cheaper, renewable energies. As the study found, banks and lending institutions in Australia are now less and less likely to finance new coal plants, because they’ve simply become a bad investment.

And while Australian wind is cheapest now, by 2020—and maybe sooner—solar power will also be cheaper than coal and gas in Australia. The energy game is rapidly changing in that country.

Michael Liebreich, the chief executive of Bloomberg New Energy Finance, noted, “The perception that fossil fuels are cheap and renewables are expensive is now out of date.”

Well, here’s a news flash: That perception has been out of date for a while now—even right here in the United States.

According to the Energy Information Administration, 199looking ahead to 2016, natural gas is the cheapest energy in the United States at roughly $66/MWh. Coal comes in second at $94/MWh. But right behind coal is renewable wind at $97/MWh, which in large part accounts for why US wind energy production has tripled since 2000.

And, unlike in Australia, none of those US prices account for the externalities associated with fossil fuels, consequences such as pollution, cancers, the need for military protection, or global warming. In America, the fossil-fuel industry has made sure those externalities are paid for not by the coal and gas energy producers but instead by you and me.

The fossil-fuel industry doesn’t pay a penny of the cost of rapidly accelerating climate change. Or the health care costs from exhaust- and refinery-driven diseases and deaths from air, water, and other pollution. Not to mention the community costs of decreasing property values when a coal plant is put in your backyard. Nor do they put a cent toward the cost of our navy keeping the oil-shipping lanes open or of our soldiers “protecting” the countries that “produce” all that oil.

All of these externalities come with fossil-fuel production, but pretty much don’t exist with renewable-energy production. And those externality costs are not only not paid for by the fossil-fuel industry—they’re never even mentioned in the corporate-run “news” media in America.

Research from the Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences concludes that the total cost of these externalities, if paid by the polluters themselves, would raise US fossil-fuel prices by as much as nearly $3/MWh. 200And that’s an extremely conservative estimate. Which puts wind power on parity with coal in America.

The trend lines here are pretty clear: Buggywhip, meet automobile!

Renewables are getting cheaper, and fossil fuels are getting more expensive.

Which is why we as a nation need to throw everything we have at making renewable energies our primary way of powering America into the twenty-first century.

Think of it as a new Apollo Project. We need green energy, local energy, and a twenty-first-century smart grid to handle it all.

Over time, the marketplace could do this. But markets are reactive, not active. With just about every developed country in the world ahead of us, and our dependence on oil making us more and more tightly bound to Middle Eastern dictators and radicals, to wait and hope that big transnational corporations will help birth a new America is both naive and stupid. Instead of depending on them, we should be recovering from them the cost of their externalities with a carbon tax that can be used to build that new energy infrastructure for America.

Let’s take a lesson from Australia and the Eurozone, which have both set up carbon taxes to make nineteenth-century energy barons pay for at least some of the damage they’ve done. And then use that revenue for a green-energy revolution here in America.

The way to get there is known. The products are available. The pressure is growing, from climate change–induced disasters to a growing recognition that transferring $1 billion a day to other countries (and big transnational corporations) to buy oil is no way to live.

In January 2013, in Chattanooga, Tennessee, a massive solar-power facility comprising over 33,600 individual solar modules capable of producing 13.1 gigawatt hours of electricity every year was turned on. 201It’s big enough to power 1,200 homes, but will be used to power a Volkswagen manufacturing plant. And it’s the biggest solar installation ever built in the state of Tennessee.

Also, the United States just surpassed Germany as the number two country in the world when it comes to producing wind power. The largest wind farm in the world, the Alta Wind Energy Center, 202is located right here in the United States in Kern County, California. The Department of Energy estimates that 20 percent of our national energy could be produced by wind come 2030. 203

After the Crash of 2016, we must move forward with new energy.

CHAPTER 15

Democratize the Economy

The few own the many because they possess the means of livelihood of all… The country is governed for the richest, for the corporations, the bankers, the land speculators, and for the exploiters of labor. The majority of mankind are working people. So long as their fair demands—the ownership and control of their livelihoods—are set at naught, we can have neither men’s rights nor women’s rights. The majority of mankind is ground down by industrial oppression in order that the small remnant may live in ease.

—Helen Keller, 1911

Igot picked up in a cab by a lawyer.

I was in Madison, Wisconsin, to speak, for the second year in a row, at the “Fighting Bob Fest,” where about ten thousand progressives from the upper Midwest have gotten together every year for the past decade (at the suggestion of Jim Hightower, and organized by Ed Garvey) to celebrate the memory of progressive Republican “Fighting Bob” La Follette. I gave one of several keynote addresses along with Senator Bernie Sanders, Cornel West, and Greg Palast, among others.

But this year was different from previous years at Fighting Bob Fest. The new governor, Scott Walker, had launched his attack on unions, sparking hundreds of thousands of Wisconsinites and other supporters of unions from across America to gather on the lawns of the capitol in Madison in protest. With the unions mobilized, recall elections were launched against several Republican state senators, and were successful against two, nearly tipping the balance of power in the state senate back to the Democrats. Soon, a recall campaign would be launched against Governor Scott Walker himself.

Читать дальше
Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

Похожие книги на «The Crash of 2016»

Представляем Вашему вниманию похожие книги на «The Crash of 2016» списком для выбора. Мы отобрали схожую по названию и смыслу литературу в надежде предоставить читателям больше вариантов отыскать новые, интересные, ещё непрочитанные произведения.


Отзывы о книге «The Crash of 2016»

Обсуждение, отзывы о книге «The Crash of 2016» и просто собственные мнения читателей. Оставьте ваши комментарии, напишите, что Вы думаете о произведении, его смысле или главных героях. Укажите что конкретно понравилось, а что нет, и почему Вы так считаете.

x