Thom Hartmann - The Crash of 2016

Здесь есть возможность читать онлайн «Thom Hartmann - The Crash of 2016» весь текст электронной книги совершенно бесплатно (целиком полную версию без сокращений). В некоторых случаях можно слушать аудио, скачать через торрент в формате fb2 и присутствует краткое содержание. Город: New York, Год выпуска: 2013, ISBN: 2013, Издательство: Twelve Books, Жанр: Публицистика, Политика, на английском языке. Описание произведения, (предисловие) а так же отзывы посетителей доступны на портале библиотеки ЛибКат.

The Crash of 2016: краткое содержание, описание и аннотация

Предлагаем к чтению аннотацию, описание, краткое содержание или предисловие (зависит от того, что написал сам автор книги «The Crash of 2016»). Если вы не нашли необходимую информацию о книге — напишите в комментариях, мы постараемся отыскать её.

The United States is more vulnerable today than ever before—including during the Great Depression and the Civil War—because the pillars of democracy that once supported a booming middle class have been corrupted, and without them, America teeters on the verge of the next Great Crash.
The United States is in the midst of an economic implosion that could make the Great Depression look like child's play. In THE CRASH OF 2016, Thom Hartmann argues that the facade of our once-great United States will soon disintegrate to reveal the rotting core where corporate and billionaire power and greed have replaced democratic infrastructure and governance. Our once-enlightened political and economic systems have been manipulated to ensure the success of only a fraction of the population at the expense of the rest of us.
The result is a “for the rich, by the rich” scheme leading to policies that only benefit the highest bidders. Hartmann outlines the destructive forces-planted by Lewis Powell in 1971 and come to fruition with the “Reagan Revolution”—that have looted our nation over the past decade, and how their actions fit into a cycle of American history that lets such forces rise to power every four generations.
However, a backlash is now palpable against the “economic royalists”—a term coined by FDR to describe those hoarding power and wealth-including the banksters, oligarchs, and politicians who have plunged our nation into economic chaos and social instability.
Although we are in the midst of what could become the most catastrophic economic crash in American History, a way forward is emerging, just as it did in the previous great crashes of the 1760s, 1856, and 1929. The choices we make now will redefine American culture. Before us stands a genuine opportunity to embrace the moral motive over the profit motive—and to rebuild the American economic model that once yielded great success.
Thoroughly researched and passionately argued, THE CRASH OF 2016 is not just a roadmap to redemption in post-Crash America, but a critical wake-up call, challenging us to act. Only if the right reforms are enacted and the moral choices are made, can we avert disaster and make our nation whole again.

The Crash of 2016 — читать онлайн бесплатно полную книгу (весь текст) целиком

Ниже представлен текст книги, разбитый по страницам. Система сохранения места последней прочитанной страницы, позволяет с удобством читать онлайн бесплатно книгу «The Crash of 2016», без необходимости каждый раз заново искать на чём Вы остановились. Поставьте закладку, и сможете в любой момент перейти на страницу, на которой закончили чтение.

Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

They became an export machine. In 2011, they held the second largest trade surplus in the world, over $200 billion (the United States was in debt $800 billion). And they turned into Europe’s primary manufacturing plant, supplying most of the European continent with its goods.

While Germany boasted one of the largest trade surpluses in the world, other European nations were driven into trade deficits. The United Kingdom, France, Spain, Italy, Greece, and Portugal all have some of the largest trade deficits in the world.

Greece’s trade deficit with Germany is startling. In 2009, Greece sold 1.8 billion euros of exports to Germany. But that same year, it bought 6.7 billion euros of imports from Germany.

What all of this meant is that wealth was flying out of indebted European nations such as Greece, Italy, and Spain and accumulating in German banks. And those German banks, flush with cash, became epicenters of lending throughout Europe, since they were able to offer better interest rates than most other nations.

This export machine makes up 40 percent of the German economy today, and has catapulted them to the fourth largest economy in the world in terms of nominal dollars, despite having a significantly smaller population than the top three nations of Japan, China, and the United States.

So, when the financial panic blew a hole in their economy, the Germans were able to recover quickly. Their enormous manufacturing base immediately went to work recouping lost wealth. In 2012, unemployment dropped to just three million people, the lowest level in twenty years.

Meanwhile their bankers and Economic Royalists went to work recouping the rest.

As the biggest economy in Europe, and with the most cash on hand to help ailing nations, Germany has been driving the Troika’s agenda across Europe. It helps, too, that the European Central Bank is headquartered in Frankfurt.

The people of Germany may have kept their own Economic Royalists shackled and incapable of feasting on the middle class the way they’ve done in the United States. [2]Meanwhile, the German people have quietly endorsed the pillaging of fellow European nations through austerity.

Germany could have endorsed a plan to have the European Central Bank print more euros, and fund stimulus programs in indebted nations to put people in Greece and Spain back to work growing their respective economies (similar to what FDR did in the 1930s and what Germany did domestically after the 2007–08 financial panic).

But instead, German bankers exploited the debt crisis to turn the rest of Europe into indebted slaves. They funneled hundreds of billions of dollars in loans through bailout programs across Europe to ensure that foreign depositors (many of whom were Germans) are repaid by debtor nations. And in return for those bailouts, Germany demanded that Greece, Spain, Portugal, and Ireland carry out painful spending cuts that crippled working people in those nations who were employed by or relied on the government.

Despite the intended purpose of austerity, research from the United Kingdom’s National Institute of Economic and Social Research found, in October 2012, that debt-to-GDP ratios increased significantly higher and faster under austerity than if no austerity had been imposed at all. 159

But reducing the debt-to-GDP ratios was never the intent of the Royalists allied with Germany and the technocrats at the Troika. Instead, their goal was to harvest Europe in the same way Bain Capital would have done to an American business. Bulldoze the economy and working class, sell off the commons, and then prime Greece to be sold off to foreign investors (many of them German) at fire-sale prices.

With the entire continent still racked by economic turmoil five years into the austerity era, Germany has profited immensely.

Since it is the only stable economy left, investors actually pay Germany to take a loan from them. In 2012, Germany was paying a 0.01 percent interest rate on about $5 billion worth of debt. As Der Spiegel notes, “Amid the ongoing euro crisis, Germany is one of the few borrowers that are still regarded as a safe haven. Many investors would rather lend the government money at bargain-basement rates than risk losses.” 160

Der Spiegel goes on to say, “It has become a rule of the euro crisis: While a number of Eurozone countries suffer, Germany profits. The crisis may slow economic growth in Germany, but there are also a raft of crisis-related mechanisms that help the country profit at the expense of other nations.”

As of 2013, Germany has spent or committed to spend nearly $400 billion on these “crisis-related mechanisms” aimed at saving the Eurozone in a way that ensures German dominance over the continent on a scale not seen since Hitler toppled Paris.

George Soros criticized the German response to the euro crisis, saying, “Germany did the minimum that was necessary to preserve the euro but no more! And that is what maintained the crisis conditions which are now four years old.” 161

He remarked on what Europe looks like now under German financial rule, “I am afraid Europe is in an existential crisis. The debtor countries are subordinate to the dictates of the creditor countries and have effectively been relegated to second-class memberships.” 162

In fact, in January 2012, when it looked like Greece might reject a bailout and leave the euro, Germany proposed ousting the democratically elected government of Greece and installing a European commissioner (think Detroit financial manager) with the power to rewrite the national budget and make sure that Greece takes its medicine prescribed by Germany.

Economist Richard Wolff remarked to me on the Greece situation, in which Royalists are squeezing whatever they can out of the population, “The irony is, when you look back at the history of empires, it has been that narrowness, that failure to look at the long-term, that absorbed self-interest, that has been the final end of those empires.” 163

Germany Goes Too Far

The question asked in 2013 in Europe was just how far were Germany and the Troika willing to go? Not only how much more money are they willing to spend keeping the Eurozone intact but just how ruthless will they be in their continuing demands for austerity as governments in Greece and Spain unwind into austerity death spirals, thus deepening the debt crisis?

After all, if Germany destroys Europe’s economy, won’t they destroy their own consumer base?

Not necessarily. Based on the way they’re structuring their trade relations, Germany is able to see the Eurozone out to its bitter end.

Like the Economic Royalists in America who’ve sold out the middle class to capture emerging markets in the developing world, the Germans are preparing for a post-Europe export economy.

As the BBC reported in late 2012, “German businesses are becoming less and less reliant on selling to Eurozone countries and are becoming more and more successful in selling to China and the leading emerging markets.” 164

Since 2000, Germany’s trade to European partners has dropped significantly from over 45 percent to 38 percent in 2012, and it is projected to be 34 percent by 2020.

Meanwhile trade to the BRIC nations—Brazil, Russia, India, and China—is surging from 3.9 percent in 2000 to almost 12 percent in 2012, and projected to be 24 percent in 2020.

The BBC notes the significance of China in Germany’s trade strategy, reporting, “What is particularly striking is that in eight years German trade with China alone is projected to be 15.6 percent of the total, according to the trends, or not far off double the share represented by Germany’s most important Eurozone trading partner, France.”

So just as the European continent is becoming more and more reliant on Germany, Germany is gearing up to cut the strings loose. Pegging the emergence of China in Germany’s trade relations, the BBC notes, “To put it another way, by 2015 it will be so obvious to the German people that it is business with China that is making them richer that their incentive to show fiscal solidarity with Spain and Italy—to use German wealth to underpin the recovery of weaker Eurozone economies—will be even less than it is today.”

Читать дальше
Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

Похожие книги на «The Crash of 2016»

Представляем Вашему вниманию похожие книги на «The Crash of 2016» списком для выбора. Мы отобрали схожую по названию и смыслу литературу в надежде предоставить читателям больше вариантов отыскать новые, интересные, ещё непрочитанные произведения.


Отзывы о книге «The Crash of 2016»

Обсуждение, отзывы о книге «The Crash of 2016» и просто собственные мнения читателей. Оставьте ваши комментарии, напишите, что Вы думаете о произведении, его смысле или главных героях. Укажите что конкретно понравилось, а что нет, и почему Вы так считаете.

x