Henry Paulson - On the Brink - Inside the Race to Stop the Collapse of the Global Financial System

The clock was ticking. We would need a weekend with the markets closed to put the GSEs into conservatorship, but we were running out of weekends before Lehman was scheduled to report its second-quarter earnings, which were going to be disastrous.

By midweek FHFA had written up its semiannual review letters for Fannie and Freddie. These they sent on September 4 in draft form. They were tough letters, accompanied by affidavits from their examiners, that dissected capital and management deficiencies and noted all the corrections the companies had been asked to make and hadn’t. Management was asked to share these with their boards. Then Jim called the CEOs to say that he wanted to meet with them and that he would be joined by the chairman of the Fed and the Treasury secretary. They had to know something was wrong.

On Friday afternoon, September 5, we met with management of the companies; on Saturday, September 6, we met with their boards, which agreed to the takeover; and on Sunday, we announced that we had placed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into conservatorship. Asian markets rallied on the news.

The next day they opened for business with new CEOs: Herb Allison, former CEO of TIAA-CREF, at Fannie; and David Moffett, former chief financial officer of U.S. Bancorp, at Freddie. Treasury’s administrative head, Peter McCarthy, organized a remarkably smooth transition. Common shareholders had lost nearly everything, but the government had protected debt holders and buttressed each entity with $100 billion in capital and generous credit lines. Fannie and Freddie would have to shrink their massive portfolios and would no longer be allowed to lobby the government.

Working nearly nonstop to stave off disaster for the crippled housing markets and U.S. economy, we had, within a few months, managed to force massive change at these troubled but powerful institutions that had stymied reformers for years.

I was concerned about explaining to Congress why we’d been forced to use our new authorities, and I also worried that I’d be criticized for turning temporary powers into a permanent guarantee. As it turned out, the bigger issue was that the government had been forced to “bail out” Fannie and Freddie, putting the taxpayers at risk. This was an indicator of things to come.

The GSE crisis left me dead tired. But my staff worked even harder, hammering out the details of this extraordinary government rescue. I told Josh Bolten that solving the GSE crisis was the hardest thing I had ever done.

I had no idea.

I began Monday, September 8, with an early round of television interviews, part of my plan to spend much of the week reassuring taxpayers, the markets, and the institutions’ employees that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had been stabilized. The initial reaction to our weekend moves to seize control of the two big mortgage companies had encouraged me. Asian and European markets had surged, and Japanese and Chinese central bankers had applauded. The U.S. government had essentially guaranteed the GSEs’ debt, but I knew it would take time and a focused effort to communicate that clearly to all investors.

By 8:00 a.m. I’d talked to CNBC, CBS, and Bloomberg. I was careful to emphasize that Fannie’s and Freddie’s employees were not responsible for the housing decline or their companies’ problems. “This was created by Congress a long time ago. It was a system that shouldn’t have existed,” I told CNBC’s Steve Liesman.

When U.S. markets opened, Fannie’s and Freddie’s stocks fell like stones, as expected, but the Dow shot up 330 points at the start of trading. I had little time to exult, though, as the disaster that had loomed all summer began to unfold.

Ken Wilson came into my office to tell me that talks between Lehman Brothers and the Korea Development Bank were going nowhere. The week before, news leaks had prompted speculation that KDB would buy up to 25 percent of Lehman. But Ken, who was on the phone with Lehman CEO Dick Fuld every day—and had talked with him the night before—downplayed the possibility of a deal. Lehman shares were up at the opening, but if the talks failed they would plummet, just as the firm was about to announce a big third-quarter loss.

Lehman’s plight wasn’t the only troubling news. Late Monday morning, General Electric CEO Jeff Immelt called to tell me that his company was having problems selling commercial paper. This stunned me. Although GE’s giant financial unit, GE Capital, had faltered along with the rest of the industry, the company as a whole was an American business icon—one of the few with a triple-A credit rating. If GE couldn’t sell its paper, what did that mean for other U.S. companies?

Monday afternoon belonged to the GSEs. I gave interviews to the Washington Post and Fortune magazine and met with Chris Dodd, who was close to Fannie and Freddie, and had gotten upset with me over the weekend. I sat down with him and his staff at his office and explained our thinking, telling him that his leadership, and that of Barney Frank and Richard Shelby, had been critical to helping us avoid a disaster. He seemed much more comfortable after the meeting.

The market stayed strong through the day, with the Dow closing up 290 points, or 2.6 percent, at 11,511. But Lehman’s shares dropped $2.05, to $14.15, while its credit default swaps edged up to a worrisome 328 basis points. And the markets still did not know that Lehman’s talks with KDB were collapsing.

I had hoped that the GSE takeovers would give Lehman a bit of breathing room, but I was wrong.

I arrived at the office shortly after 6:00 a.m. and headed straight to the Markets Room. Lehman’s shares were headed toward single digits, and its credit default swaps were under pressure. I went to Ken Wilson’s office to get the latest on Dick Fuld. The KDB deal, Ken told me, was dead.

“Does he know how serious the problem is?” I asked.

“He’s still clinging to the view that somehow or other the Fed has the power to inject capital,” Ken answered.

I felt a wave of frustration. Tim Geithner and I had repeatedly told Dick that the government had no legal authority to inject capital in an investment bank. That was one reason I had been pushing him to find a buyer since Bear Stearns failed in March. Fuld had replaced Lehman’s top management, laid off thousands of employees, and pitched restructuring ideas, but the firm’s heavy exposure to mortgage-backed securities had discouraged suitors and left him unable to make a deal.

Ken had been telling Dick with increasing urgency that he needed to be ready to sell, but Dick did not want to consider any offer below $10 per share. Bear Stearns had gotten that, and he would accept nothing less for Lehman.

After I spoke with Ken, I had an important obligation to fulfill. I was scheduled to address Freddie Mac’s employees. Many people at Treasury couldn’t believe that I wanted to meet with a group that was sure to be angry with me. It was simple. I felt bad for them, and they deserved to hear straight from me where they stood. And I wanted them to know that our actions had not resulted from any fault of theirs.

David Moffett, the new CEO, and I stood on a stage in an auditorium at the company’s headquarters in McLean, Virginia, facing hundreds of disheartened and confused Freddie Mac employees who wanted to hear about their futures and whether their shares would ever rebound. I knew that Freddie Mac stock had made up a big percentage of their net worth.

I was very direct. I told them that the odds were low that they would ever recapture the equity value that had been lost, but I emphasized that as long as they kept learning, honing their skills, and helping Freddie perform its vital function, their careers would likely remain intact. I couldn’t say what Freddie’s ultimate structure would be—that was for Congress and the next administration to decide—but I noted that the old business model was flawed and didn’t work. It was a difficult meeting, but I was glad I went.