James Barrington - Pandemic

Action followed in 1972 when medical teams were sent into Central Africa – into an area that subsequently became known as the ‘AIDS Belt’ – and administered what was described as a smallpox vaccination to several thousand Africans. [11] Did the US Government Develop the AIDS Virus? Network 23 broadcast on a Los Angeles Public Access Cable Channel. A full transcript is available at the following URL: http://www.totse.com/en/conspiracy/the_aids_conspiracy/aids-us.html . This event was followed some time later by the first outbreak of AIDS on the planet.

Earlier, I mentioned the significance of the dates of the American infections. In 1978 a medical programme administered Hepatitis B Vaccine to thousands of male homosexuals living in New York; nineteen months into the AIDS pandemic, five hundred and one of the dead were from New York. In 1980 a similar programme was run in San Francisco, with almost precisely the same results. In both cases, the only common factor in the spread of the disease was that all the victims had either received the hepatitis vaccine or were closely associated with someone who had. [11] Did the US Government Develop the AIDS Virus? Network 23 broadcast on a Los Angeles Public Access Cable Channel. A full transcript is available at the following URL: http://www.totse.com/en/conspiracy/the_aids_conspiracy/aids-us.html .

But everybody knows that AIDS is essentially a venereal disease, transmitted primarily by male homosexuals. Isn’t it? No, it isn’t. At least, not according to the British Royal Society of Medicine, which has stated that AIDS meets none of the criteria of a venereal disease and has suggested that, despite the misrepresentations of the American medical establishment and the American Government, AIDS is not primarily a sexually transmitted disease. [12] Problems Associated with AIDS . House of Commons Third Report from the Social Services Committee Session 1986–87. Minutes of Evidence (8 April–13 May 1987). Memorandum by Dr John Seale, Royal Society of Medicine. Full transcript at URL: http://www.believersweb.org/view.cfm?id=519 .

Semen is just about the least effective transmission medium for AIDS, and the virus is only present in microscopically small numbers in the semen of an infected person. Furthermore, condoms are useless in preventing the spread of AIDS, because the virus is less than half the size of the smallest sub-microscopic holes that are found in every condom. [12] Problems Associated with AIDS . House of Commons Third Report from the Social Services Committee Session 1986–87. Minutes of Evidence (8 April–13 May 1987). Memorandum by Dr John Seale, Royal Society of Medicine. Full transcript at URL: http://www.believersweb.org/view.cfm?id=519 . , [13] ‘AIDS: Biowarfare Experiment Out of Control?’ by Sean MacKenzie, 1993. URL: http://mindgallery.com/hiddenroom/biowarfare.html .

But don’t take my word for it. As part of the evidence that was submitted in a memorandum to the British Parliament’s House of Commons Social Services Committee in 1987, Dr John Seale of the Royal Society of Medicine stated: ‘As far as it goes, the tiny research effort into infectivity of bodily fluids indicates that saliva is far more infectious than genital secretions, but that blood is vastly more infectious than either. Consequently, the idea that [the use of] condoms can have any significant effect on the spread of AIDS in a nation is utterly preposterous’. [12] Problems Associated with AIDS . House of Commons Third Report from the Social Services Committee Session 1986–87. Minutes of Evidence (8 April–13 May 1987). Memorandum by Dr John Seale, Royal Society of Medicine. Full transcript at URL: http://www.believersweb.org/view.cfm?id=519 .

And: ‘Governments all over the world are spending millions of pounds, advising their citizens to prevent AIDS by using condoms on the basis of manifestly fraudulent misrepresentation of scientific evidence’. [12] Problems Associated with AIDS . House of Commons Third Report from the Social Services Committee Session 1986–87. Minutes of Evidence (8 April–13 May 1987). Memorandum by Dr John Seale, Royal Society of Medicine. Full transcript at URL: http://www.believersweb.org/view.cfm?id=519 .

A better description of AIDS is just that it’s a transmissible disease, and contracting AIDS does not directly depend on your sexual orientation. That said, most research suggests that male homosexuals are primarily responsible for the spread of the disease in Western society but not, in the main, through exchange of semen or saliva. The principal transmission method appears to be through the bleeding that can accompany certain types of homosexual activity.

The best method of contracting AIDS is through an injection. Or you can become infected by means of a blood transfusion, or through a cut on your hand. Or from somebody who has the disease sneezing near you. Some mosquitoes in America are believed to carry the virus.

So what is AIDS? All the independent evidence suggests that it’s a manufactured plague. What the AIDS virus resembles more than anything else is a bonding of Bovine Lymphotrophic or Leukaemia virus (BLV) – a virus that targets lymph cells in cattle and is known to cause cancer – and the sheep Visna virus. The only possible way these two different types of virus, which infect completely different species of animal, could bond together would be by someone engineering it in a laboratory, and then further engineering it, possibly by combining it with the human herpes virus, to allow it to make the jump into a human system.

And all the indications are that that is precisely what was done. What is not clear is whether the release of this virus into the population was an act of deliberate genocide or simply the result of shoddy laboratory technique. The medical profession, after all, has a long and less than illustrious history of contaminated vaccinations. Probably the most notable of these was the administration in 1955 of improperly inactivated Salk polio vaccine prepared by the Cutter Laboratories in Berkeley, California. Almost eighty children contracted polio, and passed the disease on to a further one hundred and twenty relatives and friends. Eleven died and three-quarters of the victims were paralysed.

In a chilling foretaste of the media censorship surrounding the AIDS pandemic – of which more later – Bernice Eddy, the doctor who blew the whistle about the Cutter vaccine, was forced out of her laboratory and out of work for daring to suggest the unthinkable. [14] Emerging viruses by Leonard G. Horowitz D.M.D., M.A., M.P.H., Tetrahedron Publishing Group, ISBN: 0–923550–12–7, page 487.

The Cutter case was a horrendous example of science gone bad, but it certainly wasn’t the last such incident. The CDC recorded almost forty-nine thousand adverse reactions to vaccinations between 1991 and 1996, and it was estimated by American health authorities that in this period around 90 per cent of the most severe cases were never reported. Extrapolating those figures, perhaps as many as one million Americans may be harmed by vaccines, and tens of thousands seriously injured, every year. [15] Emerging viruses by Leonard G. Horowitz D.M.D., M.A., M.P.H., Tetrahedron Publishing Group, ISBN: 0–923550–12–7, page 528.

There are three really terrifying facts about AIDS.

First, it is a very efficient killer with a mortality rate of exactly 100 per cent. AIDS is, just like Ebola Zaïre, a species-killer: the only difference is that Ebola kills in days, while AIDS takes its time. Virtually all the treatments that are currently available are aimed at prolonging the life of the victim, not curing the disease. As far as is known, nobody has ever been cured of AIDS – it’s just that some victims take longer to die than others.