Randy Singer - The Justice Game
Здесь есть возможность читать онлайн «Randy Singer - The Justice Game» весь текст электронной книги совершенно бесплатно (целиком полную версию без сокращений). В некоторых случаях можно слушать аудио, скачать через торрент в формате fb2 и присутствует краткое содержание. Жанр: Криминальный детектив, на английском языке. Описание произведения, (предисловие) а так же отзывы посетителей доступны на портале библиотеки ЛибКат.
- Название:The Justice Game
- Автор:
- Жанр:
- Год:неизвестен
- ISBN:нет данных
- Рейтинг книги:4 / 5. Голосов: 1
-
Избранное:Добавить в избранное
- Отзывы:
-
Ваша оценка:
- 80
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
The Justice Game: краткое содержание, описание и аннотация
Предлагаем к чтению аннотацию, описание, краткое содержание или предисловие (зависит от того, что написал сам автор книги «The Justice Game»). Если вы не нашли необходимую информацию о книге — напишите в комментариях, мы постараемся отыскать её.
The Justice Game — читать онлайн бесплатно полную книгу (весь текст) целиком
Ниже представлен текст книги, разбитый по страницам. Система сохранения места последней прочитанной страницы, позволяет с удобством читать онлайн бесплатно книгу «The Justice Game», без необходимости каждый раз заново искать на чём Вы остановились. Поставьте закладку, и сможете в любой момент перейти на страницу, на которой закончили чтение.
Интервал:
Закладка:
He didn’t need to say that. Kelly had already told him she was not going to let Luthor dictate what she should do on this case. But now Judge Shaver had made a special phone call to go on record distancing himself from Kelly’s decision.
It felt vaguely like a setup, as if Shaver was trying to keep her mollified yet at the same time separate himself from her decisions. If Kelly tried to say that the judge had urged her not to settle in order to keep their affair a secret, he would just trot out this phone call as evidence to the contrary.
It was clever and subtle, but she saw right through it. Judge Shaver didn’t trust her. He was trying to erect a wall of separation between her decisions on the case and their adulterous relationship.
In the world of D.C. politics, it was, as usual, every man for himself.
50
For Jason Noble and Andrew Lassiter, it was almost like old times.
But not quite.
The air between them was noticeably chillier now-not quite see-your-breath chilly but not exactly warm bayou nights either-as they sat together in Jason’s conference room and watched the videotaped depositions of Melissa Davids and Jarrod Beeson. There was an unspoken acknowledgment that Jason had not stepped up for Andrew when Justice Inc. had done Andrew wrong. That pall hung over their meeting, though both men were too reserved or stubborn to talk about it.
While he watched the depositions, Andrew toyed with a number of spreadsheets on his computer, tweaking the characteristics they wanted for their model jurors. He would need to do some focus groups to test his thinking, he told Jason, but he had researched the gun-control issue in the past.
They needed to avoid African American women and upper-class white women, according to Lassiter. No Democrats. Baptists and Pentecostals were fine; mainline Protestants were trouble. Catholics could go either way. Intellectual elites were disastrous-especially readers of Atlantic Monthly or the New York Times. Same for environmentalists unless they were avid hunters. Jason wanted folks who shopped at Kroger and Target, not Fresh Market and Nordstrom.
And Lassiter pointed out one other surprising correlation. Law enforcement personnel would side with the gun manufacturers 90 percent of the time.
“Why is that?” Jason asked.
“Most cops are firearms and hunting enthusiasts,” Lassiter responded, blinking rapidly. “They believe that disarming honest citizens does nothing to reduce crime and might deprive those citizens of the means of self-defense.”
During one of the breaks, while Lassiter was using the men’s room, Jason wandered out to the reception area.
“That guy’s weird, ” whispered Bella, loud enough to be heard down the hall.
“But very talented,” Jason said in a much softer whisper, hoping that Bella would take the hint.
“He’s got this blinking thing going on,” she complained, her volume unaffected. “And he won’t look you in the eye. When he was sitting over there waiting for you, he had the jitters like crazy.”
“He’s not trying the case, Bella. He’s just helping pick the jury.”
She shook her head, unconvinced. “Something’s not right about him,” she said, making a face.
Three hours later, Bella peeked into the conference room where Jason and Lassiter were still watching the videotaped depositions. “It’s six o’clock,” she said. “You need anything before I leave?”
“No, we’re fine,” Jason replied, his attention still on the monitor. But before Bella could turn to go, a thought hit him. He pressed pause.
“Bella, come here a minute.” He handed her the transcript from Melissa Davids’s deposition. “Pick out a question on any page,” Jason said. “Andrew, let’s see if you can guess the answer.”
“There’s no point in this,” Andrew said.
“Just humor me. Bella, go ahead and pick out a question.”
Bella and Andrew looked at Jason with matching frowns, but he wouldn’t let it go. A frustrated Bella exhaled forcefully enough to move a small sailboat and turned to the middle of the deposition. “‘Do you know what an illegal straw sale is?’” she asked, her tone registering her protest.
“‘Of course,’” Andrew said.
Bella shot Jason a look, like she’d just seen an impressive card trick. “‘Explain it to me,’” she read.
This time, Andrew stared at the wall for a moment and fluttered his eyelids. “‘Is it my job to explain the law to her?’”
Jason smiled. He remembered the line from the deposition-and his own response. “You don’t have to explain it,” Jason said, “but it might help us get out of here.”
“Actually,” Andrew said, “your precise line was, ‘Not really. But maybe if you do, we can get out of here faster.’ Then Ms. Davids says, ‘A straw purchase transaction is when an eligible purchaser of a firearm buys a gun on behalf of another person who is an ineligible purchaser of a firearm. Let’s say, for example-’”
“All right,” Bella said. “I get it. You can stop now. But let me just check something…” Like a true skeptical New Yorker, she flipped through a few pages in the deposition and started reading again.
“‘You’re aware that the cities of New York, Washington, Baltimore, and Philadelphia have filed lawsuits against rogue gun dealers based on guns they sold that were later traced to crimes on the streets of those cities?’”
“‘Yeah, I’m aware,’” said Andrew, playing the part of Melissa Davids. “‘You want my opinion on those suits?’”
“‘That won’t be necessary.’”
“‘Didn’t think so.’”
“Wow.” Bella shook her head, a converted skeptic. “How do you do that?”
Lassiter twitched and looked back to his computer program-game over. “I don’t know. I’ve just always been able to remember things.”
“Un-flippin’-believable,” Bella said. “You oughta go on Jeopardy! ”
“Thanks, I’ll keep that in mind.”
51
Hiring Rafael Johansen was not Jason’s idea. It had been suggested-no, it had been insisted on-by Andrew Lassiter. “What good is a micromarketing program for selecting jurors if we don’t know enough about their lifestyles to match them up?”
According to Lassiter, nobody could do a better job of providing detailed background information for prospective jurors than Rafael Johansen and his investigative team.
“I thought Rafael was employed by Justice Inc.,” Jason said.
“Are you kidding? Robert Sherwood is not about to put Justice Inc. on the hook for Johansen’s actions. Rafael works as an independent contractor. Sherwood gets all the dirt on the real jurors without ever having to know how it came into Johansen’s greasy hands. Plausible deniability. Richard Nixon style.”
Jason eventually agreed to bring Johansen on board but insisted on calling Robert Sherwood first. This caused a heated argument between Jason and Andrew Lassiter, but Jason was not about to back down. “If Sherwood has a problem with it, I’ll find another investigator,” Jason said.
“It’s none of Sherwood’s business,” Andrew replied.
Jason called anyway and learned, much to his surprise, that Sherwood thought it was a superb idea. Jason got the impression that Sherwood was going to put a lot of money on Jason’s side of the case and wanted to see Jason get all the help he needed. “Just be prepared,” Sherwood warned. “He doesn’t come cheap.”
Jason’s next call was to Case McAllister to obtain the client’s approval. Everything was a go until they found out how much Johansen’s services cost. After two days of phone negotiations, they finally talked Johansen into a billing rate of “only” $325 for himself and $200 for his associates. To Jason’s chagrin, his jury investigator was now making more per hour than he was. To secure payment, Johansen required a $50,000 retainer.
Читать дальшеИнтервал:
Закладка:
Похожие книги на «The Justice Game»
Представляем Вашему вниманию похожие книги на «The Justice Game» списком для выбора. Мы отобрали схожую по названию и смыслу литературу в надежде предоставить читателям больше вариантов отыскать новые, интересные, ещё непрочитанные произведения.
Обсуждение, отзывы о книге «The Justice Game» и просто собственные мнения читателей. Оставьте ваши комментарии, напишите, что Вы думаете о произведении, его смысле или главных героях. Укажите что конкретно понравилось, а что нет, и почему Вы так считаете.