Don Gutteridge - Turncoat

“And a plausible bit of deduction that was. Though highly improbable. But I interrupt-please continue.”

“You decided that Joshua must be killed because you concluded he was a turncoat and because his death would be personally convenient and profitable to you.”

Child smiled. “The man was a Tory. When he cut himself he bled blue.”

“Quite so. When he came back to Crawford’s Corners, you took him into the Georgian Club. You attended the same church. You became his solicitor. More than that, you had already taken an interest in the property of his son and daughter-in-law. You arranged a mortgage on their farm for them so they could build a barn, buy cattle, and diversify, likely using your contacts with the Bank of Upper Canada, which routinely refuses loans to impecunious farmers.”

“You’ve learned a lot about us in eight short months.”

“Not enough, I fear. But I suspect you coveted Jess’s farm because it borders on the Clergy Reserves section. Given your status and influence with those in high places, you planned to purchase that protected property, a very valuable piece of real estate that would eventually yield a handsome profit.”

“It is not against the law to make a profit.”

“But you knew that Jesse Smallman was not likely to make a go of his farm.”

“Then why would I be foolish enough to bail him out with a mortgage?”

“You had to get him in deep enough to ensure his complete financial failure, and to have the land revert to you as the mortgage holder. You must have been pleased when he took his own life, as you and everyone else thought at the time.”

“It wasn’t I who manufactured the drought. Nor did I sit in the Legislature that enacted the Clergy Reserves statute. Even so, I fail to see what this putative bit of melodrama has to do with Jesse’s father or cold-blooded murder.”

“Following Jesse’s death, Joshua Smallman surprised himself and you by packing up and leaving Toronto to come to the aid of his daughter-in-law. He paid off the mortgage, thwarting your designs on the property. Still, with the drought and no government action on the Clergy Reserves, the farm remained a doubtful prospect for the Smallmans. I believe you befriended Joshua not only because he was a conservative businessman but because you hoped you might persuade him to give up the farm as a losing proposition and take his in-laws back to Toronto or over to Cobourg.”

“You are employing a surfeit of ‘suspectings’ and ‘believings,’ are you not?”

Child appeared to be enjoying himself. Certainly Marc could see no sign that his mounting assault was having any disquieting impact on the magistrate.

“I also suspect,” Child continued with a smile, “that you will have to eliminate me as murderer because I happened to have spent New Year’s Eve from eight o’clock till two in the morning in this very room with a score of the district’s most law-abiding citizens. But do continue. I’m eager to hear how I killed a man I admired while I was several miles from the site.”

Marc took a deep breath. “I believe you watched with growing unease as Joshua Smallman began to attend Reform rallies with his daughter-in-law, ostensibly as her chaperone. Every Wednesday evening you and your Tory acquaintances talked a bit of politics between bouts of whist, and it became apparent that the Reform propaganda was having a serious effect on Joshua. I imagine he nodded his head in assent less and less as the summer wore on. I’ll wager he began to stay on after the others had left to voice his concerns to a man of some power and authority in the district, and indirectly in the councils of the Family Compact in the capital. He would have been discreet at first, ambivalent even, not knowing himself what was happening to him. I think he found it nearly impossible to accept the dawning truth that the Tories themselves were ultimately responsible for the economic mess the province was falling into, and not the rebellious farmers with their legitimate grievances.”

“You can’t be a true believer without periods of doubt,” Child said.

“But was Joshua Smallman still a true believer? That was the question that tormented you. Beth has told me that her father-in-law started missing the Wednesday soirees in the fall. By early December you two had had a serious falling out. All your subtle attempts to persuade him to sell the farm had failed. Moreover, Joshua’s increasing sympathy for the Reform cause seemed to guarantee that he would never sell his son’s land-as a matter of principle. I suggest that you quarrelled openly after the others had gone one evening. He may have hinted to you that his own son might have been driven to break the law, and later to take his own life, by the injustices inflicted upon him. However he worded his withdrawal on that day, he left you with the shattering conclusion that he had turned Reformer.”

“Good reason for losing a friend, I should think, but hardly provocation for murder.” Child poured himself another brandy. The man seemed to be pleased that this droll young ensign had provided him with a ready excuse to miss the tedium of an Anglican sermon.

“Agreed. But it is one thing to turn one’s political colours-many gentlemen have done so in the Mother Parliament-and quite another when those colours belong to a nation.”

“As our own United Empire Loyalists did in the eyes of the American revolutionaries?”

“I’m talking about treasonous activity, sedition, casting your lot in with your own country’s enemies.”

“You are not implying that Joshua Smallman was a traitor, a turncoat?”

“No, but I know for a fact that you yourself thought so.”

“Indeed. Do you read minds in addition to your military duties?”

“Just before Christmas, Constable Hatch apprehended a peddler named Isaac Duffy and brought him promptly to you. You soon discovered he was up to his Yankee eyebrows in rum-running. On the document Hatch had removed from him, you caught sight of the names of a couple of notorious villains you’d been trying for years to get evidence against: Jefferson and Nathaniel Boyle. The two of you rode straight out to their farms, but they’d already fled back to the States or gone into deep hiding.”

“I fail to see where this is going,” Child said, but he made no move to rise.

“You took special note of their names, but you also took note of the name just below the Boyles’ on that incriminating document: J. Smallman. A very faint line had been drawn through it, so faint that Hatch only noticed it this morning upon close examination. Since the list seemed to be a current one, you assumed that the ‘J’ referred to Joshua. Hatch assumed it was Jesse and ignored it: what good would it do to speak ill of the dead? But you were so shocked you said nothing. Instead, you went along with Hatch in search of the Boyles. But you couldn’t get it out of your mind that Joshua Smallman’s name was listed under the words ‘Hunting Sherry.’ You likely knew from your own sources at Government House that there were serious allegations being made concerning the existence and operations of the Hunters’ Lodges-even though you showed only nominal interest in the subject on Wednesday evening. Connors and O’Hurley used ‘hunting’ as a code word for the local insurrectionists they were enlisting. Given what you had observed of Joshua’s leanings over the preceding months, it all fit.”

Marc leaned forward in his chair. “I submit, sir, that by Christmas Day you had reached the sad conclusion that Joshua Smallman, in his grief over his son’s horrific death and the bitterness he felt at the collapse of his lifelong beliefs, had gone over to the enemy and that, using the smuggling operation as a cover, he was actively supporting the Hunters.” Marc practically hissed the next sentence. “And you yourself said to me in this very room that the people you despised most in the world were smugglers and traitors.”